Case law

People v. Bretado

178 Cal. App. 2d 465 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 29, 1960

Asked by the officer if the brown-wrapped cigarettes were his, he said he knew nothing about them. … It is interesting to note that even before defendant opened the box and viewed the contents, he denied knowledge of the brown cigarettes without asking the officer to what brown cigarettes he was referring.

Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. Surety Co.

145 Cal. App. 3d 245 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1983

An example of reasonable diligence was found in Brown v. … (Nail v. Osterholm (1970) 13 Cal.App.3d 682 at pp. 687-688 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 908 ].) We view this case, as did the court in Brown v.

County of Santa Clara v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 2023

(Delaney v. Superior Court (1990) 50 Cal.3d 785, 798 (Delaney).) To determine intent, we first turn “ ‘to the words themselves for the answer.’ ” (Ibid., quoting Brown v. … (City and County of San Francisco v. County of San Mateo (1995) 10 Cal.4th 554, 563 (San Mateo), citing Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan (1980) 27 Cal.3d 855, 866.)

People v. Roeschlaub

21 Cal. App. 3d 874 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1971

In People v. … Brown.”

Kirschner Brothers Oil, Inc. v. Natomas Co.

185 Cal. App. 3d 784 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1986

v. … For example, in Wood v.

People v. Frangadakis

184 Cal. App. 2d 540 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1960

Proc., § 1850, 19 Cal.Jur.2d 204; Orella v. Johnson, 38 Cal.2d 693, 696 [ 242 P.2d 5 ] ; People v. Mahoney, 201 Cal. 618, 621 [ 258 P. 607 ] ; People v. Brown, 131 Cal.App.2d 643, 656 [ 281 P.2d 319 ]; Hahn v. … (Tokaji v. State Board of Equalization, 20 Cal.App.2d 612 [ 67 P.2d 1082 ]; Cooper v. State Board of Equalization, 137 Cal.App.2d 672 [ 290 P.2d 914 ]; Schaub’s, Inc. v.

Scheenstra v. California Dairies, Inc.

213 Cal. App. 4th 370 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2013

Co. v. … Co. v.

Ellis v. Wells Manufacturing, Inc.

216 Cal. App. 3d 312 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1989

(Brown v. Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal.3d 427, 431-432 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 737 , 476 P.2d 105 ]; Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 836 .) … (Board of Administration v. Glover (1983) 34 Cal.3d 906, 914 [ 196 Cal.Rptr. 330 , 671 P.2d 834 ].)

Turner v. Victoria

California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 2021

(State Dept. of State Hospitals v. … Boy Scouts of America v.

Calexico Lumber Co. v. Emerson

54 Cal. App. 239 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 1921

In Bell v. Brown, 22 Cal. 671 , there is a dictum at variance with the principle of the cases just cited, and the language of that case, at least, was applied in Hayes v. Silver Creek etc. … Although the dictum in Bell v. Brown is apparently in accord with the rule in many of the other states (note to Seattle National Bank v. Jones, 48 L. R. A. 177, 188, and note to Susznik v. Alger Logging Co., Ann.

People v. Molina

25 Cal. App. 4th 1038 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1994

(Texas v. Brown (1983) 460 U.S. 730, 739-740 [ 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 511-513 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 ].) … (See People v. Johnson (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 52, 55-56 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 811 ] and People v. Grubb (1965) 63 Cal.2d 614, 620-621 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 772 , 408 P.2d 100 ].) As discussed, under New York v.

Antelope Valley Union High School District v. McClellan

55 Cal. App. 244 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1921

(People v. Town of Ontario, 148 Cal. 625 [ 84 Pac. 205 ]; People v. … The language of the statute is almost identical with that construed in the case of Cosgriff v. Board of Election Commrs., 151 Cal. 407 [ 91 Pac. 98 ].

People v. Lyon

135 Cal. App. 2d 558 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1955

(People v. Ruef, 14 Cal.App. 576 [ 114 P. 48, 54 ]; People v. Anderson, 75 Cal.App. 365 [ 242 P. 906 ]; People v. Glass, 158 Cal. 650 [112 P. 281]; People v. Peete, supra; People v. … In People v.

Kite v. Campbell

142 Cal. App. 3d 793 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1983

(Weber v. City Council (1973) 9 Cal.3d 950, 958-959 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 513 P.2d 601 ].) The right to sue for negligently inflicted injuries has been specifically held not to constitute a fundamental right. (Brown v. … “[T]he Legislature may restrict the period of limitations on a pending claim so long as the plaintiff is given ‘a reasonable time in which to sue.’ ” (Brown v.

Wild Goose Country Club v. County of Butte

60 Cal. App. 339 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1922

Land Co. v. … In Sunday Lake Iron Co. v.

County of San Diego v. Montgomery

23 Cal. App. 3d 174 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1972

(See Pearson v. State Social Welfare Board, 54 Cal.2d 184, 189, 214 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 353 P.2d 33 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P.

People v. Brewer

192 Cal. App. 4th 457 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 2011

(See, e.g., People v. Brown (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 1354 [ 107 Cal.Rptr.3d 286 ], review granted June 9, 2010, S181963; People v. … In People v.

Heiser v. McAlpine

20 Cal. App. 2d 467 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1937

(McCormick v. Brown, supra; Chaffee v. Browne, 109 Cal. 211 [ 41 Pac. 1028 ] ; Southern Pac. Co. v. Prosser, 122 Cal. 413 [ 52 Pac. 836 , 55 Pac. 145 ], 3. … (Citing McCormick v. Brown, supra, and Chabot v. Tucker, 39 Cal. 434 .)

Estate of Browne

2 Cal. App. 3d 406 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 8, 1969

Rptr. 705 Estate of HARRY TRUMAN BROWNE, Deceased. GAYLA LEE BROWNE COBB WEIBLE, Petitioner and Respondent, v. F. FILMORE JAFFE, Objector and Appellant. Docket No. 34473. … Browne's probate proceeding.

Graves v. Commission on Professional Competence

63 Cal. App. 3d 970 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1976

(Bank of Italy v. Johnson, 200 Cal. 1, 21 [ 251 P. 784 ]; see Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. Cal. Emp. Com., 24 Cal.2d 753, 759 [ 151 P.2d 233 , 155 A.L.R. 405 ].) … (Aylward v. State Board etc. Examiners, 31 Cal.2d 833, 839 [ 192 P.2d 929 ].) In the present case, Mr.