Case law

Genser v. State Personnel Board

112 Cal. App. 2d 77 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1952

In so holding we followed the decisions of the Supreme Court in Boren v. State Personnel Board, 37 Cal.2d 634 [ 234 P.2d 981 ], and Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125 [ 173 P.2d 545 ]. … In the ease of Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing Board, 36 Cal.2d 167 [ 223 P.2d 1 ], the court quoted from McDonough v.

Wallace v. Board of Education

63 Cal. App. 2d 611 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1944

(Bandini Estate Co. v. Payne, 10 Cal.App.2d 623 [ 52 P.2d 959 ].) Local boards (not those having statewide authority) may act in a judicial capacity as a quasi judicial body. (Nider v. … (Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal.App. 270 [ 279 P. 1080 ]; McColgan v.

Jaques v. Board of Supervisors

22 Cal. App. 627 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1913

(Shaw v. Blasevich, 21 Cal. App. 498 , [ 132 Pac. 278 ].) … In re Ryer, 110 Cal. 560 , [ 42 Pac. 1082 ]; Woodside v. Howel, 107 Cal. 141 , [ 40 Pac. 103 ]; Warren v. Hopkins, 110 Cal. 506 , [ 42 Pac. 986 ]; Poole v. Grand Circle, Women of Woodcraft, 17 Cal.

Blake v. State Personnel Board

25 Cal. App. 3d 541 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1972

(See Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal.3d 214, 223-230 .) But as our Supreme Court stressed in Board of Education v. Swan, 41 Cal.2d 546, 556 [ 261 P.2d 261 ], and iterated as recently as in Morrison v. … Control, 51 Cal.2d 84, 90 [ 330 P.2d 769 ]; Brown v. Gordon, 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 666 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 901 ]; Hopper v. State Personnel Board, 204 Cal.App.2d 273, 275 [ 22 Cal.Rptr. 88 ].)

Loehr v. Board of Education

12 Cal. App. 671 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1910

(Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 , [ 22 Pac. 1042 ]; Barthel v. Board of Education, 153 Cal. 376 , [ 95 Pac. 892 ]; Stockton v. Board of Education, 145 Cal. 246 , [ 78 Pac. 730 ]; Bradley v. … {Stockton v. Board of Education, 145 Cal. 246 , [ 78 Pac. 730 ]; Barthel v. Board of Education, 153 Cal. 376 , [95 Pac. 892]; Bradley v. Board of Education, 1 Cal. App. 212 , [ 81 Pac. 1036 ].)

Shaw v. Board of Administration

109 Cal. App. 2d 770 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1952

(Rudell v. Board of Administration, 8 Cal.2d 600, 602 [ 66 P.2d 1203 ].) … (Rudell v. Board of Administration, 8 Cal.2d 600, 603 [ 66 P.2d 1203 ].)

Vielehr v. State Personnel Board

32 Cal. App. 3d 187 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1973

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (Nightingale v. State Personnel Board, supra, 7 Cal.3d 507, 514-516 ; Cadillo v. Board of Medical Examiners (1972) 26 Cal.App.3d 961, 966-967 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 455 ]; Hopper v.

Brown v. Yarraham Gold Mining Co.

3 Cal. App. 474 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1906

Fichera v. State Personnel Board

217 Cal. App. 2d 613 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1963

(Hohreiter v. Garrison, 81 Cal.App.2d 384 [ 184 P.2d 323 ].) … Orders to take polygraph tests by police officers have been sustained in McCain v. Sheridan, 160 Cal.App.2d 174 [ 324 P.2d 923 ], and Frazee v.

Petersen v. Civil Service Board

67 Cal. App. 70 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1924

Co. v. … Co. v. Placer Co., 46 Cal. 670 ; Buckley v. Superior Court, 96 Cal. 120 [ 31 Pac. 8 ]; Bergevin v. Wood, 11 Cal. App. 643 [ 105 Pac, 935 ]), nor as a writ of mandamus. (Townsend v.

Pavlovsky v. Board of Trade

171 Cal. App. 2d 110 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1959

It follows, under the rationale of the decisions, that the communication from board to members, if made without malice, was within the privilege defined in section 47, subdivision 3. (Locke v. Mitchell, supra; Emde v. … Council, 23 Cal.2d 146, 161 [ 143 P.2d 20 , 150 A.L.R. 916 ]; Maher v. Devlin, 203 Cal. 270 [ 263 P. 812 ] ; Freeman v. Mills, 97 Cal.App.2d 161 [ 217 P. 2d 687 ] ; Glenn v.

Morris v. Board of Education

119 Cal. App. 750 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1932

In the case of Archer v. … (See, also, Barnes v. Cocke, 112 Cal. App. 562 [ 297 Pac. 598 ]; Moore v. Rogers, 102 Cal. App. 783 [ 283 Pac. 840 , 284 Pac. 916 ]; 2 Cal. Jur. 521; 16 Cal. Jur. 641, and authorities there cited.)

Lucas v. Board of Trustees

18 Cal. App. 3d 988 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1971

The latter section provides that the chapter in which it appears (commonly called the “Brown Act”) does not prevent the board “from holding executive sessions ... to consider the appointment, employment or dismissal of a … Brown (H. C.), J., and Caldecott, J., concurred.

Brown v. Department of Veterans Affairs

178 Cal. App. 3d 392 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1986

(Veterans’ Welfare Board v. Burt, supra, 4 Cal.App.2d at p. 661.) … (Veterans’ Welfare Board v. Burt (1935) 4 Cal.App.2d 659, 661 [ 41 P.2d 587 ].) But whether plaintiffs complied with their contract is not really at issue here.

Matthews v. Board of Education

198 Cal. App. 2d 748 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1962

(Fry v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.2d 753, 760 [6] [ 112 P.2d 229 ] ; Fidler v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal.App. 296, 306 [ 296 P. 912 ] ; Gould v. Santa Ana High School Dist., 131 Cal.App. 345, 349 [ 21 P.2d 623 ].) … (Mitchell v. Board of Trustees, 5 Cal.App.2d 64, 69 [4] [ 42 P.2d 397 ]; Anderson *755 y. Board of Education, 126 Cal.App. 514, 520 [3] [ 15 P.2d 774 , 16 P.2d 272 ] ; Cullen v.

Ross v. Board of Education

18 Cal. App. 222 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 13, 1912

(Fremont v. Crippen, 10 Cal. 211 , [ 70 Am. Dec. 711 ]; Babcock v. Goodrich, 47 Cal. 488 ; Raisch v. Board of Education, 81 Cal. 542 , [ 22 Pac. 890 ]; Robertson v. Trustees, 136 Cal. 403 , [ 69 Pac. 88 ].) … (Raisch v. Board of Education, 81 Cal. 542 , [ 22 Pac. 890 ] ; Apgar v. Trustees , 34 N. J. L. 308; Merrill on Mandamus, secs. 109, 115, pp. 130, 140.) The rule declared in Raisch v.

Rockwood v. Brown International Investment Co.

51 Cal. App. 2d 241 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1942

Said defendant relied upon Shiver v. Liberty Building-Loan Assn., 16 Cal. (2d) 296 [ 106 P. (2d) 4 ], The court there said at page 300, “As stated in the McAllister case (McAllister v. … (McAllister v. Drapeau, supra, page 109.)

McKenzie v. Board of Education

1 Cal. App. 406 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 1905

Code, secs. 1791, 1793; Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 490 , [ 22 Pac. 1042 ].) … (Kennedy v. Miller, 97 Cal. 434 , [ 32 Pac. 558 ].)

Frommhagen v. Board of Supervisors

197 Cal. App. 3d 1292 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1987

In Commissioner v. … Such report shall be filed with the clerk of the board of supervisors.

Lesem v. Board of Retirement

183 Cal. App. 2d 289 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1960

Lesem to the retirement board advising the board of Dr. … (Wendland v. City of Alameda, 46 Cal.2d 786 [ 298 P.2d 863 ] ; Gray v. Bolger, 157 Cal.App.2d 583 [ 321 P.2d 485 ].)