Case law

People v. Logan

257 Cal. App. 2d 267 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1967

(See People v. Hampton, 47 Cal.2d 239, 240 [ 302 P.2d 300 ]; Hughes v. Heinze (9th Cir.) 268 F.2d 864, 866 .) … Gibson, 94 Cal.App.2d 468, 471 [ 210 P.2d 747 ]; People v. Subia, 239 Cal.App.2d 245, 251 [ 48 Cal. Rptr. 584 ]; People v. Martell, 197 Cal.App.2d 195, 197 [ 16 Cal. Rptr. 918 ] ; People v.

Gallin v. Superior Court

230 Cal. App. 3d 541 · California Court of Appeal · May 10, 1991

(Jhirmack Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior Court (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 715, 720 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 192 ].) Both Jeffrey and Gallin rely on Brown v. … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 37 Cal.3d at pp. 485-486.)

Wiley v. Rhodes

223 Cal. App. 3d 1470 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1990

(Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide, supra, §6:169.1, rev. #1, 1990.) In Becker v. S.P. V. … (Weil & Brown, Cal.

Barry v. State Bar

California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 2013

(Brown v. Desert Christian Center (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 733, 737 (Brown).) The trial court properly determined that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the claims alleged in plaintiff‟s complaint. … (Brown, at p. 740.)

Marriage of Brandes

California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2015

(Hahn v. … (Telish v.

Sanchez v. State of California

179 Cal. App. 4th 467 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 2009

(See Brown v. Boren (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1316 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 758 ] [litigant may not assert a new theory on appeal].) B. … (Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1144 [ 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 207 ].) E.

Leppo v. City of Petaluma

20 Cal. App. 3d 711 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1971

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. Respondents were awarded a judgment in the sum of $30,636.42 by reason of the demolition of their building by the City of Petaluma and their demolition contractor, Cecil H. Kinney. … (E.g., Armistead v. City of Los Angeles, 152 Cal.App.2d 319 [ 313 P.2d 127 ]; Yen Eng v. Board of Building & Safety Commissioners, 184 Cal.App.2d 514 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 564 ]; Perepletchikoff v.

In re Trejo

10 Cal. App. 5th 972 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 2017

Griggs v. … Oates (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1048, 1057, quoting Sierra Club v.

Harland v. State of California

99 Cal. App. 3d 839 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1979

Franchise Tax Board (1977) 75 Cal.App.3d 377, 380 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 130 ]; Smith v. City and County of San Francisco (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 227, 230 [ 137 Cal.Rptr. 146 ]; Chase v. … Moreover, the Kansas court has subsequently limited the effect of Brown , holding interest recoverable against the state when sued on an express contract. (Shapiro v.

Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.

204 Cal. App. 4th 1425 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 2012

(Tex.Ct.App. 2006) 222 S.W.3d 127, 132 ; Nabors Drilling USA, LP v. Carpenter (Tex.Ct.App. 2006) 198 S.W.3d 240, 248-249 (Nabors Drilling); *1468 In re Kellogg Brown & Root (Tex.Ct.App. 2002) 80 S.W.3d 611, 616 .) … (In re Kellogg Brown & Root, supra, 80 S.W.3d at p. 614 .) The court held that the agreement was “binding and enforceable.” (Id. at p. 616.)

People v. McKerney

257 Cal. App. 2d 64 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1967

Later the officer took from the car, attached by a magnet to the dash board, a flashlight with a red rim. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied February 8, 1968.

People v. Ruiz

California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 2020

(People v. DeLeon (2017) 3 Cal.5th 640, 647 (DeLeon).) … A report from the Department of Finance prepared for Governor Brown noted that the Board of Parole Hearings had no authority to make a decision regarding the disposition of an offender when it finds an offender should have

City of Burbank v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority

85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 28 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 1999

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ].) We therefore do not reach the Authority’s contentions regarding the application of the statute. … (Williams v. Mayor (1933) 289 U.S. 36, 40 [ 53 S.Ct. 431, 432 , 77 L.Ed. 1015 ].) “The same reasoning applies to the due process protections afforded under the California Constitution.” (Board of Supervisors v.

Foley v. U. S. Paving Co.

262 Cal. App. 2d 499 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1968

(Freeman v. Donohoe, 65 Cal.App. 65 [ 223 P. 431 ].) … (Meyers v. Texas Co., 6 Cal.2d 610, 618 [ 59 P.2d 132 ].)” We see no distinction in principle between the instant ease and that considered in Mass v.

Le Strange v. City of Berkeley

210 Cal. App. 2d 313 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1962

(French v. Cook, 173 Cal. 126 [ 160 P. 411 ] ; Sheehan v. Board of Police Comrs., 197 Cal. 70 [ 239 P. 844 ] ; Mogan v. Board of Police Comrs., 100 Cal.App. 270 [ 279 P. 1080 ]: 3 Witkin, Cal. … (Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 35 Cal.2d 242, 246 [ 217 P.2d 630 , 18 A.L.R.2d 593 ] ; see Leeds v.

People v. Bird

195 Cal. App. 2d 606 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 1961

Thereafter, Brown and Voboril drove to Vallejo where, after a discussion with Brown’s father-in-law, and at his sug *609 gestión, the incident was reported to the highway patrol. … Although Brown could not identify the gun, Voboril testified that the weapon looked like the one the defendants had. The rule as stated in People v.

Jomicra, Inc. v. California Mobile Home Dealers Ass'n

12 Cal. App. 3d 396 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1970

(Bomberger v. McKelvey, 35 Cal.2d 607, 612 [ 220 P.2d 729 ]; State Board of Barber Examiners v. Star, 8 Cal.App.3d 736, 740 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 450 ]; French Art Cleaners v. St. Bd. etc. … Brown, P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred.

Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corp. v. Surety Co.

145 Cal. App. 3d 245 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1983

An example of reasonable diligence was found in Brown v. … (Nail v. Osterholm (1970) 13 Cal.App.3d 682 at pp. 687-688 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 908 ].) We view this case, as did the court in Brown v.

Press Democrat v. Sonoma County Herald Recorder

207 Cal. App. 4th 578 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 2012

(In re Norwalk Call, supra, 62 Cal.2d at p. 189; see Brown Newspaper Publishing Company, Inc. v. … Brown Newspaper Publishing *589 Company, Inc. v.

Matter of Application of Shepard

35 Cal. App. 492 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1917

We quote from the opinion of the United States circuit court of appeals, rendered in disposing of his writ of error to that tribunal (Shepard v. United States, 236 Fed. 73, 75 , [ 149 C. C. … Brown was also employed by the same persons for the purpose of obtaining such bail.