Case law

People v. Cella

139 Cal. App. 3d 391 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1983

Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred. … (See United States v.

Talega Maintenance Corp. v. Standard Pacific Corp.

225 Cal. App. 4th 722 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 2014

(See Donovan v. … In Cabrera v.

Nathan G. v. Clovis Unified School District

224 Cal. App. 4th 1393 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 2014

Brown v. Crandall (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1, 8 [“A petitioner has no beneficial interest if she will gain no direct benefit from the issuance of a writ and suffer no direct detriment if it is denied.”].) … What process is due a student facing involuntary transfer to continuation school is a matter of significance to students and their families, school boards, and school administrators and likely to recur. (Cf. John A. v.

Thacker v. American Foundry

78 Cal. App. 2d 76 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1947

Plaintiff cites the eases of Brown v. National Electric Works (1914), 168 Cal. 336 [ 143 P. 606 ]; Gregg v. McDonald (1925), 73 Cal.App. 748 [ 239 P. 373 ] ; Seifert v. … (Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters (1946), 29 Cal.2d 34, 39 [ 172 P.2d 867, 870 ].)

People v. Martinez

53 Cal. App. 4th 1212 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1997

The appellate court in People v. Brown (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1251 [ 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 76 ] took a very restricted approach in determining if a threat satisfied section 422. … People v. Gudger (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 310 [ 34 Cal.Rptr.2d 510 ] applied the Brooks rationale and disagreed with Brown .

Badger v. Homan

45 Cal. App. 2d 235 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1941

His petition for a pension was denied by the pension board on June 6, 1940. … rests upon the board to act under section 5 of the ordinance.

Frisk v. Superior Court

200 Cal. App. 4th 402 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 2011

(Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 670 [ 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 61 , 995 P.2d 191 ] (Leone); see Fink v. Shemtov (2010) 180 Cal.App.4th 1160, 1172-1173 [ 103 Cal.Rptr.3d 509 ]; see discussion in People v. … (Brown, Winfield. & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior Court (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1233, 1241 [ 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 223 P.3d 15 ] (Brown).)

Fuchs v. Western Oil Fields Supply

25 Cal. App. 3d 728 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1972

In Brown v. Superior Court, 3 Cal.3d 427 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 737 , 476 P.2d 105 ], the court said, at page 432, “the employee makes an election to accept the benefits of the Labor Code in receiving a compensation award.” … In all other cases these amounts shall be set by the appeals board.

Estate of O'Dea

34 Cal. App. 2d 179 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1939

Rep. 105 ] ; Lynch v. Rooney, (1896) 112 Cal. 279 [ 44 Pac. 565 ]; Estate of Calhoun, (July, 1938) 27 Cal. App. (2d) 706 [ 81 Pac. (2d) 605 ], For the foregoing reasons the order appealed from is reversed.

People v. Drews

208 Cal. App. 3d 1317 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1989

(Simmons v. United States (1968) 390 U.S. 377 [ 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 , 88 S.Ct. 967 ]; People v. Cornejo (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 637 [ 155 Cal.Rptr. 238 ].) … (People v. Douglas (1977) 66 Cal.App.3d 998 [ 136 Cal.Rptr. 358 ].) In People v. Douglas, supra, 66 Cal.App.3d 998 , the defendant testified in his own behalf.

Jefferson v. Superior Court

51 Cal. App. 3d 721 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 1975

(See Rosenfeld v. New Jersey (1972) 408 U.S. 901 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 321 , 92 S.Ct. 2479 ]; State v. Rosenfeld (1972) 120 N.J.Super. 458 [ 295 A.2d 1 ]; State v. Rosenfeld (1973) 62 N.J. 594 [ 303 A.2d 889 ]; and Brown v. … Oklahoma (1972) 408 U.S. 914 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 326 , 92 S.Ct. 2507 ]; and Brown v. State (Okl.Cr. 1972) 503 P.2d 571 . Cf. Dissents Burger, C. J., Powell, J., Rehnquist, J., Rosenfeld v.

People v. McKerney

257 Cal. App. 2d 64 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1967

Later the officer took from the car, attached by a magnet to the dash board, a flashlight with a red rim. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied February 8, 1968.

Torres v. City of San Diego

64 Cal. Rptr. 3d 495 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 2007

In June 2006 the city attorney’s office served on the parties a request to dismiss the board members from the cross-complaint in the SDCERS v. Aguirre action. … The City relies on CC-California Plaza Assocs. v.

Sanchez v. State of California

179 Cal. App. 4th 467 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 2009

(See Brown v. Boren (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1316 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 758 ] [litigant may not assert a new theory on appeal].) B. … (Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1144 [ 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 207 ].) E.

De Garmo v. Petitfils Confiserie

93 Cal. App. 261 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1928

(Maxon-Nowlin Co. v. Norswing, 166 Cal. 509 [ 137 Pac. 240 ]; Hallidie v. First Federal Trust Co., 177 Cal. 600 [ 171 Pac. 431 ] ; Hackleman v. Lyman, 50 Cal. App. 323 [ 195 Pac. 263 ]; Spinks v. … Code; Matteson v. Wagoner, 147 Cal. 739 [ 82 Pac. 436 ]; Haserot v. Keller, 67 Cal. App. 659 -673 [ 228 Pac. 383 ] ; Richards v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank, 7 Cal. App. 387 -393 [ 94 Pac. 393 ]; Garcia v.

Leppo v. City of Petaluma

20 Cal. App. 3d 711 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1971

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. Respondents were awarded a judgment in the sum of $30,636.42 by reason of the demolition of their building by the City of Petaluma and their demolition contractor, Cecil H. Kinney. … (E.g., Armistead v. City of Los Angeles, 152 Cal.App.2d 319 [ 313 P.2d 127 ]; Yen Eng v. Board of Building & Safety Commissioners, 184 Cal.App.2d 514 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 564 ]; Perepletchikoff v.

Sallas v. Municipal Court

86 Cal. App. 3d 737 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 1978

V). … (See Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855, 861-862 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ]; see also Smith v. Municipal Court, 78 Cal.App.3d 592, 600-602 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 504 ].)

Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.

204 Cal. App. 4th 1425 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 2012

(Tex.Ct.App. 2006) 222 S.W.3d 127, 132 ; Nabors Drilling USA, LP v. Carpenter (Tex.Ct.App. 2006) 198 S.W.3d 240, 248-249 (Nabors Drilling); *1468 In re Kellogg Brown & Root (Tex.Ct.App. 2002) 80 S.W.3d 611, 616 .) … (In re Kellogg Brown & Root, supra, 80 S.W.3d at p. 614 .) The court held that the agreement was “binding and enforceable.” (Id. at p. 616.)

Chan v. Curran

237 Cal. App. 4th 601 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 2015

Chan relies on Brown v. … (Brown, supra, 8 Cal.3d at pp. 882–883, fn. omitted.) Subsequently, in Cooper v.

People v. Small

205 Cal. App. 3d 319 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1988

(People v. Johnson (1980) 26 Cal.3d 557, 578 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 431 , 606 P.2d 738 , 16 A.L.R.4th 1255 ].) … Johnson (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 850, 854-855 [ 204 Cal.Rptr. 877 ]; Birt v. Superior Court (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 934, 937-938 [ 110 Cal.Rptr. 321 ]; People v.