Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.33s
San Leandro Police Officers Ass'n v. City of San Leandro
55 Cal. App. 3d 553 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1976
XI, § 5; Sanders v. City of Los Angeles (1970) 3 Cal.3d 252, 262 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 475 P.2d 201 ]; Alameda County Employees’ Assn. v. … F. v. Boyd (1943) 22 Cal.2d 685, 690 [ 140 P.2d 666 ].)
Cited 18 timesPublished74 Cal. App. 3d 852 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1977
(Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. 590, 599-600 [ 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 424-425 ].) … (Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. 590, 601-602 [ 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 425-426 ].)
Cited 7 timesPublished51 Cal. App. 3d 809 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1975
He and my stepfather went into the bedroom and were talking about a card board box on the floor. They later shut the door. I wanted to get some clothes out but they wouldn’t let me in. … [Signed] Kim Simmons ‘They also hid the marijuana under their bed in a Brown filing cabinet,’ [Signed] Kim Simmons Writt [sic] by G. D. Roxon” The search warrant was issued by the magistrate.
Cited 31 timesPublishedKralow Co. v. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.
168 Cal. App. 3d 1029 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1985
, Inc. v. … (Nicholson-Brown, Inc. v. City of San Jose, supra, 62 Cal.App.3d at pp. 532- *1035 533.)
Cited 5 timesPublishedCity and County of San Francisco v. Cartagena
35 Cal. App. 4th 1061 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1995
In Brown v. Superior Court (1979) 98 Cal.App.3d 633 [ 159 Cal.Rptr. 604 ] (Brown), a similar argument was made. … They will reveal nothing about whether extrinsic fraud was practiced upon Raymond Brown or whether there was some extrinsic mistake.” (Brown, supra, 98 Cal.App.3d at p. 636 , italics added.)
Cited 41 timesPublished3 Cal. App. 193 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1906
In Brown v. Rice, 57 Me. 56 , [ 2 Am. … To the same effect are the cases of McCarthy v. State, 56 Miss. 295 , People v. Brown, 23 Wend. (N. Y.) 47, People v. Duffy, 5 Barb. (N. Y.) 205, and Ex parte Lange, 18 Wall. (U. S.) 174.
Cited 23 timesPublished94 Cal. App. 2d 272 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1949
(Mattingly v. Pennie, 105 Cal. 514 , [ 45 Am.St.Rep. 87 , 39 P. 200 ] ; Brown v. … He need have nothing to do with negotiating the bargain. (19 Cyc. 186; Brown v. Mason, 155 Cal. 155 , [ 21 L.R.A.N.S. 328 , 99 P. 867 ].) No such distinction as claimed by appellant is recognized in this state.”
Cited 34 timesPublished272 Cal. App. 2d 39 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 1969
At the time of trial Romero, a male Caucasian, 22, was 5 feet 8, weighed 130 pounds and had brown hair and blue eyes; Ramirez, a male Caucasian, 27, was 5 feet 6, 140 pounds and had brown hair and brown eyes. … United States (D.C.Cir. 1965) 348 F.2d 763 [ 121 App.D.C. 151 ]; Brown v. United States (D.C.Cir. 1966) 370 F.2d 242 ; and Gordon v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedMcIntyre v. Santa Barbara County Employees' Retirement System
110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 565 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2001
(Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 442 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 111 P.2d 610 ]; California Teachers Assn. v. Ingwerson (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 860, 865 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 917 ].) … Nor is the Board prohibited from both investigating and adjudicating applications for retirement benefits. As the Supreme Court explained in Withrow v.
Cited 11 timesPublished105 Cal. App. 546 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1930
St., 2d ed., 256; Reams v. Cooley, 171 Cal. 150 [Ann. Cas. 1917A, p. 1260].) Under the ruling in Hurley v. Sykes, 69 Cal. … In State, etc., v. Trustees Firemen’s Pension Fund, 18 Ohio C.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSan Diego Department of Social Services v. Moore
185 Cal. App. 3d 718 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1986
(Id., at pp. 314-315 [94 L.Ed. at pp. 873-874]; accord Hayssen v. Board of Zoning Adjustments (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 400, 404 [ 217 Cal.Rptr. 464 ].) … (Brown v. Douglas Aircraft Co. (1958) 166 Cal.App.2d 232, 236 [ 333 P.2d 59 ].)
Cited 37 timesPublished191 Cal. App. 4th 582 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 2011
Cua’s brief relies heavily on Brown v. Farwell (9th Cir. 2008) 525 F.3d 787 , a federal habeas corpus case reversing a state court conviction for sexual assault. … {Brown, supra, 558 U.S. at p._[ 130 S.Ct. at p. 673 ].)
Cited 20 timesPublishedRodriguez v. Board of Retirement of Fresno etc. CA5
California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 2021
Filed 2/1/21 Rodriguez v. Board of Retirement of Fresno etc. … (Hoffman v. Board of Retirement (1986) 42 Cal.3d 590, 593.)
Cited 0 timesUnpublished214 Cal. App. 4th 91 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 2013
(People v. Lockwood, supra, C066096.) … (People v. Holmberg, supra, 195 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1321-1322; see People v.
Cited 40 timesPublished164 Cal. App. 4th 1361 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 17, 2008
In describing that history, Justice Brown noted that, pursuant to People v. … Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 321 , 369 P.2d 937 ]), not by Justice Brown’s concurring opinion. (See, e.g., People v.
Cited 72 timesPublishedRegents of the University of Cal. v. Pub. Employment Relations Bd.
California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2020
Legal Found. v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 177.) … (See Gund v.
Cited 0 timesPublished250 Cal. App. 2d 561 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1967
(See Loock v. Pioneer Title Ins. etc. Co., 4 Cal.App.2d 245, 249 [40 *568 P.2d 526]; Code Civ. Proc., 372, 373; see Mabry v. … (See Loock v. Pioneer Title Ins. etc. Co., supra.)
Cited 5 timesPublishedCounty of Kern v. T.C.E.F., Inc.
246 Cal. App. 4th 301 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 2016
(Cohen v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 286.) … After reconsideration, the board of supervisors has two options for dealing with the protested ordinance.9 (Cf. Lindelli v.
Cited 58 timesPublishedPacific Acceptance Corp. v. Jones
95 Cal. App. 365 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1928
In the case of Parks v. … (Dowd v. Russell, 78 Cal. App. 262 [ 248 Pac. 293 ]; Davies-Overland Co. v. Blenkiron, 71 Cal. App. 690 [ 236 Pac. 179 ] ; Boles v. Stiles, 188 Cal. 304 [ 204 Pac. 848 ]; Kenny v. Christianson, supra.)
Cited 3 timesPublished233 Cal. App. 2d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1965
In this connection, there is no question but that the state has the right, with reasonable ex *783 ceptions, to compel minors to attend public school (see People v. … Brown (R M.), J., and Stone, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 16, 1965.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna