Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.33s

  • San Leandro Police Officers Ass'n v. City of San Leandro

    55 Cal. App. 3d 553 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1976

    XI, § 5; Sanders v. City of Los Angeles (1970) 3 Cal.3d 252, 262 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 475 P.2d 201 ]; Alameda County Employees’ Assn. v. … F. v. Boyd (1943) 22 Cal.2d 685, 690 [ 140 P.2d 666 ].)

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Fare v. Jorge S.

    74 Cal. App. 3d 852 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1977

    (Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. 590, 599-600 [ 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 424-425 ].) … (Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. 590, 601-602 [ 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 425-426 ].)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Schulle

    51 Cal. App. 3d 809 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1975

    He and my stepfather went into the bedroom and were talking about a card board box on the floor. They later shut the door. I wanted to get some clothes out but they wouldn’t let me in. … [Signed] Kim Simmons ‘They also hid the marijuana under their bed in a Brown filing cabinet,’ [Signed] Kim Simmons Writt [sic] by G. D. Roxon” The search warrant was issued by the magistrate.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Kralow Co. v. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.

    168 Cal. App. 3d 1029 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1985

    , Inc. v. … (Nicholson-Brown, Inc. v. City of San Jose, supra, 62 Cal.App.3d at pp. 532- *1035 533.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City and County of San Francisco v. Cartagena

    35 Cal. App. 4th 1061 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1995

    In Brown v. Superior Court (1979) 98 Cal.App.3d 633 [ 159 Cal.Rptr. 604 ] (Brown), a similar argument was made. … They will reveal nothing about whether extrinsic fraud was practiced upon Raymond Brown or whether there was some extrinsic mistake.” (Brown, supra, 98 Cal.App.3d at p. 636 , italics added.)

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • In Re Sullivan

    3 Cal. App. 193 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1906

    In Brown v. Rice, 57 Me. 56 , [ 2 Am. … To the same effect are the cases of McCarthy v. State, 56 Miss. 295 , People v. Brown, 23 Wend. (N. Y.) 47, People v. Duffy, 5 Barb. (N. Y.) 205, and Ex parte Lange, 18 Wall. (U. S.) 174.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Rhode v. Bartholomew

    94 Cal. App. 2d 272 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1949

    (Mattingly v. Pennie, 105 Cal. 514 , [ 45 Am.St.Rep. 87 , 39 P. 200 ] ; Brown v. … He need have nothing to do with negotiating the bargain. (19 Cyc. 186; Brown v. Mason, 155 Cal. 155 , [ 21 L.R.A.N.S. 328 , 99 P. 867 ].) No such distinction as claimed by appellant is recognized in this state.”

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • People v. Romero

    272 Cal. App. 2d 39 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 1969

    At the time of trial Romero, a male Caucasian, 22, was 5 feet 8, weighed 130 pounds and had brown hair and blue eyes; Ramirez, a male Caucasian, 27, was 5 feet 6, 140 pounds and had brown hair and brown eyes. … United States (D.C.Cir. 1965) 348 F.2d 763 [ 121 App.D.C. 151 ]; Brown v. United States (D.C.Cir. 1966) 370 F.2d 242 ; and Gordon v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • McIntyre v. Santa Barbara County Employees' Retirement System

    110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 565 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2001

    (Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 442 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 111 P.2d 610 ]; California Teachers Assn. v. Ingwerson (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 860, 865 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 917 ].) … Nor is the Board prohibited from both investigating and adjudicating applications for retirement benefits. As the Supreme Court explained in Withrow v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Carrick v. Sherman

    105 Cal. App. 546 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1930

    St., 2d ed., 256; Reams v. Cooley, 171 Cal. 150 [Ann. Cas. 1917A, p. 1260].) Under the ruling in Hurley v. Sykes, 69 Cal. … In State, etc., v. Trustees Firemen’s Pension Fund, 18 Ohio C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • San Diego Department of Social Services v. Moore

    185 Cal. App. 3d 718 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1986

    (Id., at pp. 314-315 [94 L.Ed. at pp. 873-874]; accord Hayssen v. Board of Zoning Adjustments (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 400, 404 [ 217 Cal.Rptr. 464 ].) … (Brown v. Douglas Aircraft Co. (1958) 166 Cal.App.2d 232, 236 [ 333 P.2d 59 ].)

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • People v. Cua

    191 Cal. App. 4th 582 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 2011

    Cua’s brief relies heavily on Brown v. Farwell (9th Cir. 2008) 525 F.3d 787 , a federal habeas corpus case reversing a state court conviction for sexual assault. … {Brown, supra, 558 U.S. at p._[ 130 S.Ct. at p. 673 ].)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Board of Retirement of Fresno etc. CA5

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 2021

    Filed 2/1/21 Rodriguez v. Board of Retirement of Fresno etc. … (Hoffman v. Board of Retirement (1986) 42 Cal.3d 590, 593.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People v. Lockwood

    214 Cal. App. 4th 91 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 2013

    (People v. Lockwood, supra, C066096.) … (People v. Holmberg, supra, 195 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1321-1322; see People v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • People v. Turk

    164 Cal. App. 4th 1361 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 17, 2008

    In describing that history, Justice Brown noted that, pursuant to People v. … Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 321 , 369 P.2d 937 ]), not by Justice Brown’s concurring opinion. (See, e.g., People v.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Regents of the University of Cal. v. Pub. Employment Relations Bd.

    California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2020

    Legal Found. v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 177.) … (See Gund v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Estate of High

    250 Cal. App. 2d 561 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1967

    (See Loock v. Pioneer Title Ins. etc. Co., 4 Cal.App.2d 245, 249 [40 *568 P.2d 526]; Code Civ. Proc., 372, 373; see Mabry v. … (See Loock v. Pioneer Title Ins. etc. Co., supra.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • County of Kern v. T.C.E.F., Inc.

    246 Cal. App. 4th 301 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 2016

    (Cohen v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 286.) … After reconsideration, the board of supervisors has two options for dealing with the protested ordinance.9 (Cf. Lindelli v.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. Jones

    95 Cal. App. 365 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1928

    In the case of Parks v. … (Dowd v. Russell, 78 Cal. App. 262 [ 248 Pac. 293 ]; Davies-Overland Co. v. Blenkiron, 71 Cal. App. 690 [ 236 Pac. 179 ] ; Boles v. Stiles, 188 Cal. 304 [ 204 Pac. 848 ]; Kenny v. Christianson, supra.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fischler v. Municipal Court

    233 Cal. App. 2d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1965

    In this connection, there is no question but that the state has the right, with reasonable ex *783 ceptions, to compel minors to attend public school (see People v. … Brown (R M.), J., and Stone, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 16, 1965.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.