Case law

August v. Department of Motor Vehicles

264 Cal. App. 2d 52 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1968

(Buchanan v. Nye, supra, 128 Cal.App.2d 582, 586 ; Powers v. Board of Public Works, 216 Cal. 546, 552 [ 15 P.2d 156 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P.

Consumer Watchdog v. Department of Managed Health Care

225 Cal. App. 4th 862 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 2014

(See Browne v. … In Prince v.

People v. Cassandras

83 Cal. App. 2d 272 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1948

The record shows that Carmen Brown is a divorcee and the mother of two small children. … In People v.

Dept. of Finance v. Com'n on State Mandates

122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 447 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 2002

Brown Act.... … .; Kinlaw v.

People v. Derello

211 Cal. App. 3d 414 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 1989

Taylor walked through the screening area to the boarding area and Derello returned to the telephone area where he retrieved the brown suitcase he had been carrying. … People v.

P. ex rel. Spitzer v. AWI Builders, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 2022

Brown, a practicing attorney since 1993, was a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates, had served as the 2009 president of the Orange County Trial Lawyers, had completed the California State Master Program, and had … Fund v.

People v. Severance

41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 397 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 2006

(Pan Asia Venture Capital Corp. v. Hearst Corp. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 424, 433 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 118 ].) As Justice Brown explained in her concurring opinion in People v. … (Pe ople v. Hernandez, supra, 22 Cal.4th at p. 529 (conc. opn. of Brown, J.).) The mere fact that “[t]he ‘sanity trial is ... a part of the same criminal proceeding as the guilt phase’ ” (People v.

Tarrar Enterprises v. Associated Indemnity Corp.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 2022

According to Tarrar’s complaint, in March 2020, first the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, and then the Governor, issued “shelter in place orders,” 1 which, Tarrar alleged, … (King v. Mortimer (1948) 83 Cal.App.2d 153, 158; see also Adkins v.

Clark Equipment Co. v. Wheat

92 Cal. App. 3d 503 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1979

Kesler also filed a declaration stating that Brown had possession of the TM 70. … As stated in Dale v.

Talega Maintenance Corp. v. Standard Pacific Corp.

225 Cal. App. 4th 722 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 2014

(See Donovan v. … In Cabrera v.

Wright v. State

19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 92 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 2004

In his complaint, Wright alleges that on March 31, 2002, he filed a government tort claim with the State Board of Control, which the board rejected on May 10, 2002. … The statute of limitations would not bar Wright's federal counts. (42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e; Brown v. Morgan (6th Cir.2000) 209 F.3d 595, 596 ; Harris v. Hegmann (1999) 198 F.3d 153, 158-159 .)

Green v. Southern Pacific Co.

53 Cal. App. 194 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1921

(Gay v. Winter, 34 Cal. 153, 164 ; Larrabee v. Western Pac. Ry. Co., 173 Cal. 743 , [ 161 Pac. 750 ].) … (Zibbel v. Southern Pac.

People v. Youngs

23 Cal. App. 3d 180 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1972

Even a parolee gets a hearing before the Parole Board on an allegation of violation of parole. 8 We are aware of the case of People v. … [Fn. discussing Brown.]” ( 260 Cal.App.2d at p. 396 .)

Ni v. Board of Registered Nursing CA1/3

California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 2022

The Board’s reliance on Pollak v. … (Krain v. Medical Board (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1416, 1424; see Gromis v.

In re Martinez

210 Cal. App. 4th 800 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 2012

(Martinez v. Board of Parole Hearings, supra, 183 Cal.App.4th at p. 594 .) … (Martinez v. Board of Parole Hearings, supra, 183 Cal.App.4th at p. 597 .)

Demmer v. City of Eureka

78 Cal. App. 2d 708 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1947

(Giannini v. Campodonico, 176 Cal. 548 [ 169 P. 80 ] ; Schmidt v. Bauer, 80 Cal. 565 [ 22 P. 256 , 5 L.R.A. 580 ]; Herzog v. Hemphill, 7 Cal.App. 116 [ 93 P. 899 ]; Brown v. … In Polk v.

Myres v. Bd. of Admin. for CalPERS

California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 2025

MYRES, Plaintiff and Appellant, A170516 v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION (City and County of San FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ Francisco Super. Ct. … (See Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 725 [if Legislature “ ‘has carefully employed a term in one place and has excluded it in another, it should not be [inferred] where excluded’ ”].)

Levy v. Bellmar Enterprises

241 Cal. App. 2d 686 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1966

(Ruinello v. Murray, 36 Cal.2d 687, 689 [ 227 P.2d 251 ]; Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters, 29 Cal.2d 34, 39-40 [ 172 P.2d 867 ]; Ferreyra v. E. & J. Gallo Winery, 231 Cal.App.2d 426, 430-432 [ 41 Cal.Rptr. 819 ].) … Boehm v. Spreckels, 183 Cal. 239, 249 [ 191 P. 5 ]; Brown v National Electric Works, 168 Cal. 336, 338 [ 143 P. 606 ]; Davidson v. Laughlin, 138 Cal. 320, 323 [ 71 P. 345 , 5 L.R.A. N.S. 579]; Ferreyra v. E. & J.

Kralow Co. v. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.

168 Cal. App. 3d 1029 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1985

, Inc. v. … (Nicholson-Brown, Inc. v. City of San Jose, supra, 62 Cal.App.3d at pp. 532- *1035 533.)

Wyatt v. Cerf

64 Cal. App. 2d 732 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1944

Bd. of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ]; Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790 [ 136 P.2d 304 ] ; Russell v. Miller, 21 Cal.2d 817 [ 136 P.2d 318 ] ; Sipper v. … It should be noted that at the time of the trial, February 16, 1943, Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, and Russell v. Miller, supra, had not been decided.