Case law

Miles v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

67 Cal. App. 3d 243 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1977

In this proceeding the plaintiff seeks review of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) denying her petition for reconsideration. … (Azevedo v.

Lone Oak Fund v. Cal. Franchise Tax Board CA2/3

California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 2015

(Brown v. Superior Court (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 141, 143.) b. … (a); Diepenbrock v. Brown (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 743, 749.) Therefore, the sanctions order was in error.

Hayden v. Collins

1 Cal. App. 259 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 5, 1905

(Marshal v. Shafter, 32 Cal. 176 ; McCarthy v. Brown, 113 Cal. 18 , [ 45 Pac. 14 ]; Eva v. Symons, 145 Cal. 202 , [ 78 Pac. 648 ]; Nuttall v. … True, he boarded her for a time, but it seems that he kept an account against her for articles furnished. We are left groping touching the causes which induced a change, but it appears that about February 1, 1903, Mrs.

People v. One 1951 Mercury 2-Door Sedan

116 Cal. App. 2d 692 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1953

Theus was searched by the officers, who found brown cigarette papers in his pocket but no maijuana. Woods was searched and five marijuana cigarettes wrapped in brown paper were taken from inside his sock. … From the presence of brown cigarette papers in Theus’ pocket it was reasonable to infer that he smoked cigarettes.

People v. AWi Builders, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 2022

Brown, a practicing attorney since 1993, was a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates, had served as the 2009 president of the Orange County Trial Lawyers, had completed the California State Master Program, and … Fund v.

P. ex rel. Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2026

After the meeting, Defty’s counsel emailed district to inquire whether the notices of violation were subject to review by district’s hearing board. … (Baral v. Schnitt (2016) 1 Cal.5th 376, 384.) Our review is de novo. (Park v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1057, 1067 (Park).)

People v. Shane

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 753 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 2004

Nevertheless, relying on Brown v. … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 189 Cal.App.3d at p. 266 .) Thus, upon close examination, Brown does not support the rule being urged by defendant.

People v. Petree

109 Cal. App. 2d 184 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1952

While this court held in People v. … Reingold, 87 Cal.App.2d 382 et seq. [ 197 P.2d 175 ] (hearing by Supreme Court in both cases denied) ; People v. Shaw, 17 Cal.2d 778 [ 112 P.2d 241 ] ; People v. Lima, 25 Cal.2d 573, 579 [154 P.2d 698]; People v.

Shore v. Gurnett

18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 583 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 2004

(Halper, at p. 451, fn. omitted; accord, Hudson v. United States, supra, 522 U.S. at pp. 110-111 (conc. opn. of Stevens, J.); Browning-Ferris Industries v. … (U.S. v.

Trigg v. Smith

246 Cal. App. 2d 510 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1966

Estelle Brown. When Mrs. … Brown stopped the car.

Brigden v. Dodge

54 Cal. App. 266 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1921

The case thus made was the same as that considered in Pasadena Park Improvement Co. et al. v. … (Hughes v. Ewing, 93 Cal. 414 , [ 28 Pac. 1067 ] ; Kennedy v. Miller, 97 Cal. 432 , [ 32 Pac. 558 ].) In Pasadena Park Improvement Co. v.

Hale v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

256 Cal. App. 2d 177 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1967

Exchange v. Geyer, 247 Cal.App.2d 625 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 861 ] (Division One), and Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Brown, 252 Cal.App.2d 120 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 1 ] (Division Three). … prohibit family exclusion clauses in policies sold in that state (Perlick v.

County of Orange v. Bezaire

11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 478 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 2004

Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 665 [ 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 61 , 995 P.2d 191 ] [source of previous quote]; see also Armstrong v. … Brown-Dempsey (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 421, 433 [ 134 Cal.Rptr.2d 124 ] [“Ordinarily, the word ‘may’ connotes a discretionary or permissive act; the word ‘shall’ connotes a mandatory or directory duty.”]; Decker v. U.D.

People v. Diggs

161 Cal. App. 2d 167 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1958

When the police arrived the witness saw Diggs take the brown paper bag from his pocket and throw it on the floor. The witness ad-, mitted to three prior felony convictions. … (People v. Holguin, 145 Cal.App.2d 520 [ 302 P.2d 635 ] ; Willson v. Superior Court, 46 Cal.2d 291 [ 294 P.2d 36 ] ; People v. Maddox, 46 Cal.2d 301 [ 294 P.2d 6 ]; People v.

People v. Derello

211 Cal. App. 3d 414 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 1989

Taylor walked through the screening area to the boarding area and Derello returned to the telephone area where he retrieved the brown suitcase he had been carrying. … People v.

People v. Ramirez

59 Cal. App. 4th 1548 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1997

simply order Officer Brown to detain appellant’s vehicle. … Other policy considerations behind the Fourth Amendment also tip the scale in favor of finding Officer Brown’s search and seizure valid in our case. In People v.

Eckis v. Sea World Corp.

64 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1976

Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 247 Cal.App.2d 669 , 683 . . .; Scott v. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred.

Wolstoncroft v. County of Yolo

California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2021

(Richmond [v. … (Slater v. Kehoe (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 819, 832, fn. 12, Craig v. Brown & Root, Inc. (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 416, 421-422.) Here, the County denied ever receiving protest votes from Cammarosano and Shin-Lee.

Schmid v. City & County of S.F.

California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 2021

(Faulkner v. … He relies on McQueen v.

Inderbitzen v. Lane Hospital

124 Cal. App. 462 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1932

(Dawson v. Tulare Union High School, 98 Cal. App. 138, 140 [ 276 Pac. 424 ] ; Henley v. Bursell, 61 Cal. App. 511 [ 215 Cal. 114 ]; Brown v. Sterling Furniture Co., supra.) … (Anchester v. Keck, 214 Cal. 207 [ 4 Pac. (2d) 934 ]; Miller v. Wade, 87 Cal. 410 [ 25 Pac. 487 ]; Bailey v. Brown, 4 Cal. App. 515 [ 88 Pac. 518 ].)