Case law

People v. Brock

49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 879 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 2006

(People v. … (People v.

Beverly Hills Unified School District v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

241 Cal. App. 4th 627 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 2015

Brown Act (Gov. … (Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek (1987) 193 Cal.App.3d 249, 260; see also Joint Council of Interns & Residents v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1202, 1211-1212.)

Watson v. Newman

88 Cal. App. 186 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1927

R. 1589, 165 Pac. 706 ]; Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 Pac. 1168 ]; Estate of Dargie, 162 Cal. 51 [ 121 Pac. 320 ]). It is but a step in the divorce proceeding (Brown V. Brown, supra). … R. 1396, 166 Pac. 11 ]; Bell v. Krauss, 169 Cal. 387 [ 146 Pac. 874 ]). For the reasons above stated the order appealed from is affirmed. Tyler, P. J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

County of Orange v. Bezaire

11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 478 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 2004

Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 665 [ 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 61 , 995 P.2d 191 ] [source of previous quote]; see also Armstrong v. … Brown-Dempsey (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 421, 433 [ 134 Cal.Rptr.2d 124 ] [“Ordinarily, the word ‘may’ connotes a discretionary or permissive act; the word ‘shall’ connotes a mandatory or directory duty.”]; Decker v. U.D.

San Leandro Police Officers Ass'n v. City of San Leandro

55 Cal. App. 3d 553 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1976

XI, § 5; Sanders v. City of Los Angeles (1970) 3 Cal.3d 252, 262 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 475 P.2d 201 ]; Alameda County Employees’ Assn. v. … F. v. Boyd (1943) 22 Cal.2d 685, 690 [ 140 P.2d 666 ].)

Meehan v. Hopps

144 Cal. App. 2d 284 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 1956

Brown v. Miller (1923), 286 F. 994 [ 52 App.D.C. 330 ]: The attorney had formerly been employed by the Alien Property Custodian during a period when the custodian had charge of the affairs of a certain company. … Co. v.

The Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.

252 Cal. App. 2d 327 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 5, 1967

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … appeals board (W.

Rosenthal v. Silveira

42 Cal. App. 637 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 1919

Brown, for the purchase of five acres of the real property. Brown entered into possession. … (Baker v. Eilers Music Co., 175 Cal. 652 , [ 166 Pac. 1006 ].)

Hayden v. Collins

1 Cal. App. 259 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 5, 1905

(Marshal v. Shafter, 32 Cal. 176 ; McCarthy v. Brown, 113 Cal. 18 , [ 45 Pac. 14 ]; Eva v. Symons, 145 Cal. 202 , [ 78 Pac. 648 ]; Nuttall v. … True, he boarded her for a time, but it seems that he kept an account against her for articles furnished. We are left groping touching the causes which induced a change, but it appears that about February 1, 1903, Mrs.

Daniels v. Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District

212 Cal. App. 3d 909 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1989

Board of Civil Service Commissioners (1969) 1 Cal.3d 351 , 359-360 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 337 , 461 P.2d 617 ], quoting Brown v. State Personnel Board (1941) 43 Cal.App.2d 70, 79 [ 110 P.2d 497 ], fns. omitted.) … Schoenen v. Board of Medical Exrs. (1966) 245 Cal.App.2d 909, 915 [ 54 Cal.Rptr. 364 ].)

Helena Rubenstein Internat. v. Younger

71 Cal. App. 3d 406 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1977

(Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors, 8 Cal.3d 247, 269 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].) 5 The order denying the alternative writ merely stated: “Petition for writ of mandate denied. … (Ex Parte Brown, 68 Cal. 176, 178 [ 8 P. 829 ].) *414 In United States v. Gilbert, 2 Sumn. 19, 40 , Mr.

Whiteman v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District

60 Cal. App. 234 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1922

In Jenison v. … Kaw Valley Drainage District, 109 Kan. 754 [201 i *243 Pac. 1096]; Board of Improvement v. Moreland, 94 Ark. 380 [21 Ami. Cas. 957, 127 S. W. 469 ]; Chope v. Eureka, 78 Cal. 588 [ 12 Am. St. Rep. 113 , 4 L. R.

Millview Co. Water Dist. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2016

(Norberg v. … (Id. at p. 60; see Young v.

P. ex rel. Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2026

After the meeting, Defty’s counsel emailed district to inquire whether the notices of violation were subject to review by district’s hearing board. … (Baral v. Schnitt (2016) 1 Cal.5th 376, 384.) Our review is de novo. (Park v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1057, 1067 (Park).)

Aaris v. Las Virgenes Unified School Dist.

75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 801 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 1998

Appellant and Lindsey Goldstein paired off to form the base and launched the flyer, Sharili Brown, into the air. Brown came down awkwardly, scratching their faces. … Appellant and Goldstein launched Brown into the air. Brown wobbled and fell on appellant, injuring her leg. Appellant had received stunt training while she was on the freshman high school cheerleading squad.

Miles v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

67 Cal. App. 3d 243 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1977

In this proceeding the plaintiff seeks review of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) denying her petition for reconsideration. … (Azevedo v.

City and County of San Francisco v. Cartagena

35 Cal. App. 4th 1061 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1995

In Brown v. Superior Court (1979) 98 Cal.App.3d 633 [ 159 Cal.Rptr. 604 ] (Brown), a similar argument was made. … They will reveal nothing about whether extrinsic fraud was practiced upon Raymond Brown or whether there was some extrinsic mistake.” (Brown, supra, 98 Cal.App.3d at p. 636 , italics added.)

Ward v. Superior Court

10 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1970

In County of Los Angeles v. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred. All references are to Revenue and Taxation Code unless otherwise specified.

G. B. v. Lackner

80 Cal. App. 3d 64 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1978

John Brown, a physician specializing in surgeiy. Dr. … In Richards v.

People v. One 1951 Mercury 2-Door Sedan

116 Cal. App. 2d 692 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1953

Theus was searched by the officers, who found brown cigarette papers in his pocket but no maijuana. Woods was searched and five marijuana cigarettes wrapped in brown paper were taken from inside his sock. … From the presence of brown cigarette papers in Theus’ pocket it was reasonable to infer that he smoked cigarettes.