Case law

United States Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

122 Cal. App. 2d 427 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 5, 1954

Trousdale called Brown Brothers on November 23,1951, and a representative from the adjusting agency came out and took a personal report from respondent Moynahan. She did not hear from Brown Brothers for some time. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra.)

Hosea v. Brather

71 Cal. App. 2d 826 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1945

(Egan v. Dodd, 32 Cal.App. 706 [164 P. 17]; Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. Rea, 184 Cal. 565 [ 194 P. 1024 ] ; Connell v. Brownstein-Louis Co., 86 Cal.App. 610 [ 261 P. 331]; Code Civ. Proe., §1161, subd. 4.) … (Erreca v. Meyer, 142 Cal. 308 [ 75 P. 826 ] ; Donovan v. Aetna Indemnity Co., 10 Cal.App. 723 [ 103 P. 365 ]; Brown v. Johnson, 45 Cal. 76 ; De Thomas v.

People v. Subramani

173 Cal. App. 3d 1106 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1985

(b)); count IV, felony driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent or more and causing injury to victim Brown (§ 23153, subd. (b)); and count V, misdemeanor driving with a suspended license (§ 14601.1). … Prior to trial, defendant pleaded guilty to count V. Following a jury trial, the jury returned verdicts finding defendant guilty as charged as to the felony counts involving Brown (i.e., counts II and IV).

Janssen v. Luu

57 Cal. App. 4th 272 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1997

(Brown v. McAdoo, supra, 196 Cal.App.3d at p. Supp. 23.) Orange County’s appellate department refused to follow Wisdom and Brown . In Pino v. … Brown v. McAdoo . . . held that it is unnecessary for a defendant in a municipal court action to be notified of the amount of the demand. ... [^D ... [^D We disagree with Brown .

McCormick v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Retirement System

California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 2019

Board of Administration etc., supra, 222 Cal.App.4th at p. 697, fn. omitted; see Haywood v. … Hosford v. Board of Administration (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 854 is instructive.

Int'l Medication Sys., Inc. v. Assessment App. Bd. of Los Angeles County

57 Cal. App. 4th 761 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 1997

Proper notice has been held to be jurisdictional in similar tax proceedings: It is a jurisdictional prerequisite to a hearing on a proposed assessment by a board of equalization (Huntley v. … Board of Trustees (1913) 165 Cal. 298, 301 [ 131 P. 859 ]); to a hearing on an intended sale for delinquent taxes (Miller v.

People v. Peters

191 Cal. App. 2d 581 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1961

Brown did not observe Peters reply to this statement. Small admitted to Officer Brown that he had entered the J. C. … (People v. Carroll, supra, 160 Cal.App.2d 6, 9 ; People v. Rios, 172 Cal.App.2d 623, 628 [ 342 P.2d 317 ].)

California Grocers Assn. v. City of Los Angeles

176 Cal. App. 4th 51 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 2009

Brown (2008) 554 U.S. ___ , ___ [ 171 L.Ed.2d 264 , 128 S.Ct. 2408, 2412 ] ( Brown ).) "Garmon pre-emption" ( San Diego Unions v. … Brown (2008) 554 U.S. ___ , ___ *87 [ 171 L.Ed.2d 264 , 128 S.Ct. 2408, 2412 ] ( Brown ); Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne (1987) 482 U.S. 1, 22, fn. 16 [ 96 L.Ed.2d 1 , 107 S.Ct. 2211 ] ( Fort Halifax ).)

People v. Salitter

55 Cal. App. 3d 1046 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 1976

About 20 minutes later defendant Salitter drove up to the house and carried a brown paper bag inside. *1048 Three minutes' later the intermediary left the house carrying a brown paper bag and drove away. … Before Brown (Gerald), P. J., Ault, J. and Cologne, J.

People v. Gutierrez

California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 2026

(California Correctional Peace Officers Assn v. … (Strickland v. Washington (1984) 466 U.S. 668, 687.)

Watt v. Patterson

125 Cal. App. 2d 788 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1954

[Citations.] ” (Rheingans v. Smith, 161 Cal. 362, 365 [ 119 P. 494 , Ann. Cas. 1913B 1140]. See also Smith v. … (See Bobak v. Mackey, 107 Cal.App.2d 55 [ 236 P.2d 626 ]; Tatham v. Pattison, 112 Cal.App.2d 18, 21 [ 245 P.2d 668 ]; Curran v. Heslop, 115 Cal.App.2d 476, 480, 481 [ 252 P.2d 378 ].)

People v. Osorio

194 Cal. App. 3d 183 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1987

He relies chiefly on People v. Brown (1986) 179 Cal.App.3d 207 [ 224 Cal.Rptr. 476 ]. Respondent contends that this appeal is barred by Osorio’s failure to comply with Penal Code seciton 1237.5. … Instead, we believe People v.

Satchmed Plaza Owners Assn. v. UWMC Hospital Corp.

167 Cal. App. 4th 1034 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 2008

(Lee v. Brown (1976) 18 Cal.3d 110, 114 [ 132 Cal.Rptr. 649 , 553 P.2d 1121 ].) … (Epstein v. DeDomenico, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 1246 .) “As is so often the case, however, application of the rule has generated a number of equitable exceptions.” (Lee v. Brown, supra, 18 Cal.3d at p. 115 .)

Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment Agency

104 Cal. App. 3d 631 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1980

Phillips v. Seely, 43 Cal.App.3d 104 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 863 ], was a taxpayers’ action challenging the validity of a contract between a county board of supervisors and a private party for the rendition of legal services. … (County of Sacramento v. Hickman, 66 Cal.2d 841, 849, fn. 6 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 428 P.2d 593 ], quoting Silver v. Brown, 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ].)

Mission Oaks Ranch, Ltd. v. County of Santa Barbara

65 Cal. App. 4th 713 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 18, 1998

After holding four hearings, the board of supervisors denied the project proposal. On May 23, 1995, the board adopted findings and conclusions in support of its decision. … (Citing Martinez v. Socoma Companies, Inc. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 394 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 585 , 521 P.2d 841 ]; Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 8 Cal.3d at p. 262 ; COAC, Inc. v.

Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District v. San Diego County Water Authority

17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 2004

In April 2002, the SDCWA (the Board) Board adopted the proposed rate structure recommended by a subcommittee it had established to review the SDCWA rate study. … On June 27, 2002, the Board adopted the Ordinance that incorporated the new water rate.

Hector R. v. John Martin H.

129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 223 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 2003

(Board of Retirement v. Lewis (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 956, 964 [ 266 Cal.Rptr. 225 ].) “Our primary aim in construing any law is to determine the legislative intent. [Citation.] … (Hassoon v. Shamieh (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 1191, 1195, fn. 1 [ 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 658 ]; Brown v. Williams (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 182, 186 [ 92 Cal.Rptr.2d 634 ].)

Voorhies v. Greene

139 Cal. App. 3d 989 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1983

Voorhies and Roosevelt Browne Greene became associated in the practice of law. A personal and professional friendship thereafter resulted in the formation of a law partnership. … (People v. Pacific Land Research Co. (1977) 20 Cal.3d 10, 21 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 20 , 569 P.2d 125 ].) In San Antonio Water Co. v.

Lee v. Silveira

6 Cal. App. 5th 527 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 2016

(See Green v. … (See, e.g., Country Side Villas Homeowners Assn. v.

Service Employees International Union v. County of Los Angeles

225 Cal. App. 3d 761 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1990

(Perez v. Board of Police Commrs. (1947) 78 Cal.App.2d 638, 647 [ 178 P.2d 537 ].) … In Labor Board, v.