Case law

Selma Pressure Treating Co. v. Osmose Wood Preserving Co. of America, Inc.

221 Cal. App. 3d 1601 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1990

(See Ward v. Taggart (1959) 51 Cal.2d 736, 742 [ 336 P.2d 534 ]; Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107, 1113 [ 203 Cal.Rptr. 388 ]; Terry v. Bender (1956) 143 Cal.App.2d 198, 201 [ 300 P.2d 119 ].) … (See Brown v. Superior Court (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1049, 1065-1066 [ 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 ]; but see Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982) 90 N.J. 191 [ 447 A.2d 539 , 33 A.L.R.4th 353 ].)

Gosney v. State of California

10 Cal. App. 3d 921 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1970

(Brown v. Memorial Nat. Home Foundation (1958) 158 Cal.App.2d 448, 455 [ 322 P.2d 600 , 72 A.L.R.2d 997 ].) And as said in Murphy v. … (Rittersbacher v. Board of Supervisors (1934) 220 Cal. 535, 539 [ 32 P.2d 135 ]; Beazell v. Schrader (1962) 205 Cal.App.2d 673 [ 23 Cal. Rptr. 189 ]; 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (1954) p. 2162, Appeal, § 19.)

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lipari

213 Cal. App. 2d 485 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1963

In Bacich v. … (Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274, 280 [ 57 P. 82 ].) See also Goycoolea v. City of Los Angeles, 207 Cal.App.2d 729 [ 24 Cal.Rptr. 719 ].

People v. Kentron D.

101 Cal. App. 4th 1381 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 2002

The Brown court upheld the admission in evidence of the testimony regarding the chemist’s report. Quoting Morrissey v. … The Brown court observed that the rules of evidence governing a probation revocation proceeding are “relaxed.” It warned, however, quoting People v.

Voices of Wetlands v. STATE WATER RES. BD.

69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 487 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 2008

Brown (1999) 71 Cal. App.4th 1114, 1121, fn. 5 , 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 361 .) We therefore consider the substance of appellant's contentions. 2. … We acknowledge the authority cited by respondents, which holds that staff opinion may constitute sufficient evidence to support an agency's decision. ( Browning-Ferris Industries v.

District Election of Supervisors Committee v. O'Connor

78 Cal. App. 3d 261 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 6, 1978

Birkenfeld v. … Committee v. Brown (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 879 [125 Cal.Rptr. 915 ]; 6 Witkin, Cal.

Jopson v. FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 506 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 2003

The prospective buyer applied to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to use the ERC’s. … In Brown v.

People v. Reilly

196 Cal. App. 3d 1127 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1987

Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 532 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 ] (Brown), reversed on unrelated grounds in California v. … (See, e.g., People v. Young, supra, 391 N.W.2d 270 [Michigan]; Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d 512 ; State v. Pearson (1984) 234 Kan. 906 [ 678 P.2d 605 ]; State v. Washington, supra, 622 P.2d 986 [Kansas].)

Hardesty v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

202 Cal. App. 4th 404 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 2011

Similarly, in Mobil Oil Corp. v. … Lungren v. Superior Court, *423 supra, 14 Cal.4th at p. 309 ; Sail’er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby, supra, 5 Cal.3d at p. 13 .)

FORCE FRAMING, INC. v. Chinatrust Bank (USA)

187 Cal. App. 4th 1368 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2010

Co. v. … Appellate Department (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 891 [ 196 Cal.Rptr. 258 ] (Brown); (2) Romak Iron Works v. Prudential Ins. Co. (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 767 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 869 ] (Romak); and (3) Kodiak Industries, Inc. v.

Fenn v. Harris

91 Cal. App. 3d 772 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1979

(See Maxwell v. Maxwell (1944) 66 Cal.App.2d 549, 551 [ 152 P.2d 530 ].) … Under case law (In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838, 851 ; Sangiolo v.

Singh v. Singh

9 Cal. Rptr. 3d 4 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 2004

the direction of the board.” … (Wallace v.

Helm v. Washington

118 Cal. App. 759 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1931

Defendant Brown has not appealed. Appellants claim that the relation of master and servant existed between defendants Brown and Washington at the time of the accident, for which reason Washington was liable with Brown. … (Guild v. Brown, 115 Cal. App. 374 [ 1 Pac. (2d) 528 ].) There it was held that the evidence was sufficient to support a judgment against defendant Washington upon the theory of respondeat superior.

Mikkelsen v. Hansen

California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 2019

(Cherokee Valley Farms, Inc. v. Summerville Elementary School Dist. (1973) 30 Cal.App.3d 579, 585.) … (See, e.g., Samples v. Brown (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 787, 811; Woodbury v. Brown-Dempsey (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 421, 439.)

Chorn v. Workers Comp. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 2016

(Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (1983) 34 Cal.3d 159, 165.) … (Longval v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 792, 802.)

Stevens v. Hutton

71 Cal. App. 2d 676 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1945

(Brown v. Canadian Indus. Alcohol Co. (1930), 209 Cal. 596 [ 289 P. 613 ]; Smith v. Lombard (1927), 201 Cal. 518 [ 258 P. 55 ] ; Estate of Cover (1922), 188 Cal. 133 [ 204 P. 583 ] ; Johnson v. … Studley (1926), 80 Cal.App. 538 [ 252 P. 638 ]; Heney v. Heney (1926), 80 Cal. App. 301 [ 251 P. 841 ]; Hemenway v. Abbott (1908), 8 Cal.

People v. Bailey

140 Cal. App. 3d 828 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1983

(Silver v. Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ]; Leffel v. Municipal Court (1976) 54 Cal.App.3d 569, 572 [126 Cal.Rptr.73].) … (Brian W. v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 618, 623 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 717 , 574 P.2d 788 ]; Van Arsdale v.

Dept. of the Cal. Highway Patrol v. Superior Court CA3

California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 2024

(See Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior Court (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1233, 1250.) … (See Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior Court, supra, 47 Cal.4th at pp. 1243-1244; Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc., supra, 36 Cal.3d 171.)

Moran v. Oso Valley Greenbelt Ass'n

12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 435 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 8, 2004

Appellant Oso Valley Greenbelt Association (the Association) appeals from a judgment awarding respondent Angela Moran $58,485.24 in attorney fees after a lawsuit concerning the Association’s failure to produce minutes of board … Stirling (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 658, 665 [ 174 Cal.Rptr. 200 ] the Court of Appeal reviewed the *1038 standards for awarding attorney fees under the Brown Act, which, like Corporations Code section 8337, includes a discretionary

Reinbold v. City of Santa Monica

63 Cal. App. 3d 433 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1976

In 1969, pursuant to the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (hereinafter “MMB Act”; Gov. Code, § 3500 et seq.), the City enacted Ordinance CCS No. 801 to deal with public employee organizations. … The ministerial acts of local boards and officers which can be compelled by mandamus are virtually unlimited in numbers for they arise under a wide variety of statutes and ordinances. (5 Witkin, Cal.