Case law

Blazevich v. State Board

191 Cal. App. 3d 1121 · California Court of Appeal · May 11, 1987

We must determine if the findings of the board are supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5, subd. (c); Bixby v. … Brian further cites Krouse v.

Watkins v. Pension Board

91 Cal. App. 542 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1928

same rank formerly held by the petitioner as superintendent of the city fire-alarm system; that the city electrician is performing the same duties, and, therefore, under the decisions of this court in the cases of Klench v. … Board of Pension Fund Commissioners of the City of Stockton, 79 Cal. App. 171 249 Pac. 46 ], Douglas v. Pension Board of the City of Sacramento, 75 Cal. App. 335 [ 242 Pac. 756 ], and Aitken v. Roche et al., 48 Cal.

McGuire v. Governing Board

161 Cal. App. 3d 871 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1984

In Rooney v. … Similarly, the court in Kalina v.

County of San Diego v. Brown

19 Cal. App. 4th 1054 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1993

(Brown v. … (Callie v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 1 Cal.App.3d at p. 19 ; cf. City of Los Angeles v.

Brown v. Fair Political Practices Commission

100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 606 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 12, 2000

(See Kunec v. … (Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of Equalization (1998) 19 Cal.4th 1, 12-14 [ 78 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 , 960 P.2d 1031 ]; State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v.

M. J. Ryan Co. v. Brown

138 Cal. App. 176 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1934

(Hancock v. Board of Education, 140 Cal. 554 [ 74 Pac. 44 ].) Such amendments may be allowed after the submission of the cause (Lee v. Murphy, 119 Cal. 364 [ 51 Pac. 549, 955 ]; Hancock v. … Board of Education, supra; Myers v. Holton, 9 Cal. App. 114 [ 98 Pac. 197 ]), and are deemed denied (Bank of Italy v. Johnson, 200 Cal. 1 [ 251 Pac. 784 ]).

Mandel v. Cemetery Board

185 Cal. App. 2d 583 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 1960

There is no statutory mandate requiring the board to make specific findings and hence, none were required. (Palm Springs Turf Club v. California Horse Racing Board, 155 Cal.App.2d 242 -245 [ 317 P.2d 713 ].) … (Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534 -544 [ 110 P.2d 992 ].)

Cate v. State Personnel Board

204 Cal. App. 4th 270 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2012

The prayer in the petition requested that the writ be “directed to the Board, compelling it to set aside its decision . . . and reinstate the penalty of dismissal.” … Standard of Review “Review of disciplinary action by an appointing authority is directed in the first instance to the [State Personnel] Board.

Earl v. State Personnel Board

231 Cal. App. 4th 459 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 2014

(Board). … (Zellerino v. Brown (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1097, 1106.)

Owens v. Board of Education

68 Cal. App. 403 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1924

Thereafter and on May 29, 1922, the board of education' of the Santa Cruz district, by resolution, directed the superintendent, who was also secretary of the board, to notify the appellant that she had not been re-elected … Such notice was given and the contractual relations -between the board and the teacher came to an end with the close of that school year.

Brown v. Compton Unified School District

80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 171 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1998

(Baughman v. State of California (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 182, 187 [ 45 Cal.Rptr.2d 82 ].) *117 On appeal, Brown combines his actions for negligence and breach of contract. (See Chevlin v. … (Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified Sch. Dist. (1976) 60 Cal.App.3d 814, 825 [ 131 Cal.Rptr. 854 ]; see also Nunn v.

Harby v. Board of Education

2 Cal. App. 418 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1905

(Barnes v. Gilde, 117 Cal. 1 , [ 59 Am. St. Rep. 153 , 48 Pac. 804 ]; Barber v. Mulford, 117 Cal. 356 , [ 49 Pac. 206 ]; Jones v. Police Commrs., 141 Cal. 96 , [ 74 Pac. 696 ].) … (Kennedy v. Board of Education, 82 Cal. 483 , [ 22 Pac. 1042 ].)

Jen-Mar Constr. Co. v. Brown

247 Cal. App. 2d 564 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 1967

(Tally v. Ganahl, 151 Cal. 418, 423, 424 [ 90 P. 1049 ] ; Bird v. American Surety Co., 175 Cal. 625, 631 [ 166 P. 1009 ] ; Cohn v. … In Bird v.

Wallace v. Board of Education

63 Cal. App. 2d 611 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1944

(Bandini Estate Co. v. Payne, 10 Cal.App.2d 623 [ 52 P.2d 959 ].) Local boards (not those having statewide authority) may act in a judicial capacity as a quasi judicial body. (Nider v. … (Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal.App. 270 [ 279 P. 1080 ]; McColgan v.

Crumpler v. Board of Administration

32 Cal. App. 3d 567 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1973

(McNeil v. Board of Retirement, 51 Cal.2d 278, 285 [ 332 P.2d 281 ]; Boren v. State Personnel Board, 37 Cal.2d 634, 643 [ 234 P.2d 981 ]; County of San Diego v. California Water *581 etc. … In Shoban v. Board of Trustees, supra, 276 Cal.

Lucas v. Board of Trustees

18 Cal. App. 3d 988 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1971

The latter section provides that the chapter in which it appears (commonly called the “Brown Act”) does not prevent the board “from holding executive sessions ... to consider the appointment, employment or dismissal of a … Brown (H. C.), J., and Caldecott, J., concurred.

Walter G. Brix, Inc. v. Brown

145 Cal. App. 2d 177 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1956

(People v. Sayig, 101 Cal.App.2d 890 at 897 [ 226 P.2d 702 ].) In the ease of Venice v. … As stated in Helm v.

Anderson v. Board of Education

126 Cal. App. 514 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1932

In Bland v. Board of Trustees, 67 Cal. … The latest expression of the Supreme Court upon this general subject is found in Whitmore v. Brown, 207 Cal. 473, 480 [ 279 Pac. 447, 450 ], where Los Angeles School Dist. v.

Cantrell v. Board of Supervisors

87 Cal. App. 2d 471 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 1948

Co. v. Board of Equalization, 43 Cal. 365 ; Winning v. Board of Dental Examiners, 114 Cal.App. 658 [ 300 P. 866 ]; Fuller v. Board of Medical Examiners, 14 Cal.App.2d 734, 742 [ 59 P.2d 171 ]). … Board of Dental Examiners, 27 Cal.App. 336, 339 [ 149 P. 1006 ]; Benton v. Industrial Acc. Com., 74 Cal. App. 411, 415 [ 240 P. 1021 ]; Rich v. McClure, 78 Cal.App. *478 209, 213 [ 248 P. 275 ]; Mann v.

Martin v. Board of Supervisors

135 Cal. App. 96 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1933

(Forest Lawn-Memorial Park Assn., Inc., v. State Board of Embalmers, etc., 134 Cal. App. 73 [ 24 Pac. (2d) 887 ]; Stockwell v. Equitable Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 134 Cal. App. 534 [ 25 Pac. (2d) 873 ].) … Moreover, it was held in People v.