Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.63s

  • People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Miller

    231 Cal. App. 2d 130 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 1964

    (Meyer v. State Board of Equalization, 42 Cal.2d 376, 387 [ 267 P.2d 257 ] ; Long Beach City H.S. Dist. v. Stewart, 30 Cal.2d 763, 773-775 [ 185 P.2d 585 , 173 A.L.R 249] ; Coleman v. … J., and Brown (Gerald), J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied January 8, 1965.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Boyle v. Sweeney

    207 Cal. App. 3d 998 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 1989

    Sweeney and Ronald Brown. Sweeney and Brown appeal, contending that codified antideficiency protection (see Code Civ. Proc., § 580b) 1 precludes this result. We affirm the judgment. I. … (Spangler v. Memel, supra, at p. 613 ; Ziegler v. Barnes, supra, 200 Cal.App.3d at p. 232 ; Long v. Superior Court, supra, at p. 505.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Castillo

    7 Cal. App. 4th 836 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1992

    (b); People v. … (Scott v. United States, supra, 436 U.S. 128 [ 56 L.Ed.2d 168 ]; compare Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Absmeier v. Simi Valley Unified School District

    196 Cal. App. 4th 311 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 2011

    In December 2002, the District’s board of trustees terminated his employment. … (Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 184, 190 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 881 ], italics added.)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Popovich v. O'Neal

    219 Cal. App. 2d 553 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1963

    (O’Banion v. Borba, 32 Cal.2d 145, 147 [195 P.2d 10]; Serrano v. Grissom, 213 Cal.App.2d 300 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 579 ].) … J., and Brown (R M.), J., concurred.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Snyder v. Evangelical Orthodox Church

    216 Cal. App. 3d 297 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1989

    (See also Molko v. Holy Spirit Assn., supra, 46 Cal.3d at p. 1113 , citing Braunfeld v. Brown (1961) 366 U.S. 599, 607 [ 6 L.Ed.2d 563, 568-569 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 ].) … the bishop and/or the board of elders to reveal the content of the communication to the congregation.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People v. Herman

    97 Cal. App. 2d 272 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1950

    In People v. … (See People v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Corman v. Blanchard

    211 Cal. App. 2d 126 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1962

    Governor Brown was the keynote speaker. At this time, some 2,300 C.D.C. delegates from 500 Democratic clubs approved resolutions advocating-► ’ ’ *129 On page three appears seven more resolutions: “8. … It makes a general reference to the entire school board, and a specific reference to things allegedly said by the appellant and also by another member of that board, and follows this by another general statement.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Luke v. Sonoma County

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 2019

    (E.g., San Diego City Firefighters, Local 145 v. Board of Administration, etc. (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 594; Medina v. Board of Retirement (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 864.) … City of Los Angeles (1958) 50 Cal.2d 438, 462; see also Dryden v. Board of Pension Commrs. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 575, 580–581.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lemire v. Queirolo

    250 Cal. App. 2d 799 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1967

    (Kast v. Miller & Lux, 159 Cal. 723, 728 [ 115 P. 932 ]; Swinnerion v. Argonaut Land & Dev. Co., 112 Cal. 375, 379 [ 44 P. 719 ]; People v. Dye, 75 Cal. 108, 113 [16 P. 537]; Pesler v. … VI, § 13; Vasquez v. Alameda, 49 Cal.2d 674, 677 [ 321 P.2d 1 ]; Wilkinson v. Southern Pac. Co., 224 Cal.App.2d 478, 484 [ 36 Cal.Rptr. 689 ] ; Martin v. Pacific Gas & Elec.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Drum v. Bleau, Fox & Associates

    132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 602 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 2003

    (Brown v. Kennard (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 40, 49 [ 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 891 ] (Brown); O'Keefe v. Kompa (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 130, 134 [ 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 602 ] (O'Keefe); Ion Equipment Corp. v. … (Brown, supra, 94 Cal.App.4th at p. 44 ; Merlet v.

    Disapproved on other grounds by Rusheen v. Cohen, 39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 516 (2006)Cited 29 timesPublished
  • People v. Cooper

    234 Cal. App. 2d 587 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1965

    We therefore hold that the search of defendant’s car by Groom was illegal and the evidence obtained as a result thereof, consisting of the piece of brown paper, was inadmissible. (Mapp v. … (See People v. Ortiz, supra; People v. Simpson, supra; People v. Nebbitt, supra; People v. Myles, supra; People v. Garcia, supra.) In People v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • People v. Montoya

    235 Cal. App. 2d 789 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1965

    Brown was called as a witness on behalf of the defendant. Officer Brown testified that in the course of the investigation the Jones automobile was not printed. … At the conclusion of the evidence exhibit 1, the brown bag and its contents, was admitted after extended argument. Here, as in People v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Estate of Brown

    199 Cal. App. 2d 274 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1962

    Rptr. 435 Estate of LAURA NORTON BROWN, Deceased. FIRST WESTERN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, etc., Petitioner, v. … Herbert, 186 Md. 453 [ 47 A.2d 360, 364 [7]]; Davis v. Mitchell, 27 Tenn. App. 182 [ 178 S.W.2d 889, 904 [24-26]]; Cooper v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fasuyi v. Permatex, Inc.

    167 Cal. App. 4th 681 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 15, 2008

    (Weil & Brown, Cal. … [Brown v. Presley of So.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Tesoro Del Valle Master Homeowners Ass'n v. Griffin

    200 Cal. App. 4th 619 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 2011

    (Cable Connection, Inc. v. DIRECTV, Inc. (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1334, 1351, fn. 12 [ 82 Cal.Rptr.3d 229 , 190 P.3d 586 ]; see also Brown v. … (See Mann v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Gibbs v. County of Humboldt

    California Court of Appeal · May 13, 2026

    (Brown v. County of Los Angeles (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 320, 322.) In doing so, “[w]e decide independently whether the facts alleged in the complaint suffice to state a cause of action. … (Prentice v. Board of Administration (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 983, 989.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Helix Land Co. v. City of San Diego

    82 Cal. App. 3d 932 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1978

    (Id, at pp. 512-518; see also Brown v. City of Fremont, 75 Cal.App.3d 141 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 46 ].) In Eldridge v. … (People v. Lim, 18 Cal.2d 872, 881 [ 118 P.2d 472 ]; People v. Seccombe, 103 Cal.App. 306, 310 [ 284 P. 725 ]; Brown v. Rea, 150 Cal. 171, 174, 175 [ 88 P. 713 ].)

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Boland v. Boland

    7 Cal. App. 2d 401 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1935

    Brown, 83 Cal. App. 74, 82 [ 256 Pac. 595 ], Cookinham v. Cookinham, 219 Cal. 723, 726 [ 28 Pac. (2d) 1045 ], and Huntsberger v. Huntsberger, 2 Cal. (2d) 655 [ 43 Pac. (2d) 258 ]. … (Brown v. Brown, supra.)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Boyd v. Lazarus

    198 Cal. App. 2d 658 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1961

    [Citations.] ” (See also Ira Carson Realty Co. v. Brown, 180 Cal.App.2d 615, 624-626 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 734 ]; K. Lundeen Corp. v. Barlow, 120 Cal.App. 391, 394-395 [ 7 P.2d 1102 ].) … Brown, supra, 180 Cal.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.