Case law

People v. Harwood

74 Cal. App. 3d 460 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1977

In Shuey v. … In People v.

Wood v. Superior Court

166 Cal. App. 3d 1138 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1985

(See Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gherardini, supra, 93 Cal.App.3d 669 .) … Appeals Board (1977) 19 Cal.3d 395, 406 [ 138 Cal.Rptr. 293 , 563 P.2d 849 ]; Westbrook v. Mihaly (1970) 2 Cal.3d 765, 784-785 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 839 , 471 P.2d 487 ]; Sherbert v.

Morris v. McCauley's Quality Transmission Service

60 Cal. App. 3d 964 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 1976

He is “board certified” in neurology, psychiatry, and electroencephalography. … The waiver rule in Brown is not automatic and there are many exceptions to it. (Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equip. Co., 69 Cal.2d 452 , 456-457 fn. 2 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 217 , 445 P.2d 881 ]; Mixon v.

People v. Sperl

54 Cal. App. 3d 640 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1976

Both men withdrew from the board. … (Board of Trustees v. Leach, 258 Cal.App.2d 281, 285 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 588 ].)

Gibbs v. County of Humboldt

California Court of Appeal · May 13, 2026

(Brown v. County of Los Angeles (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 320, 322.) In doing so, “[w]e decide independently whether the facts alleged in the complaint suffice to state a cause of action. … (Prentice v. Board of Administration (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 983, 989.)

People v. Taylor

67 Cal. App. 3d 403 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 1977

(People v. Purvis (1963) 60 Cal.2d 323, 348 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 104 , 384 P.2d 424 ]; People v. Green (1969) 3 Cal.App.3d 240, 247 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 491 ]; People v. Lundy (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 939, 944 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 815 ].) … (People v. Alvarez (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 375, 381 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 602 ]; People v. Simms (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 299, 312 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 1 ].) The F.I. card was, indeed, lost and could not be found.

State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

71 Cal. App. 2d 133 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1977

State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 172-173 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ]; State of California v. Ind. Acc. Com., supra, 48 Cal.2d 355, 361 ; Harrison v. Workmen’s Comp. … Los Angeles Soap Co., supra, 36 Cal.App.3d 222, 228-229 ; and Coast Bank v. Holmes, supra, 19 Cal.App.3d 581, 595 .) The opinion and order of the appeals board are affirmed. Elkington, J., and Lazarus, J., * concurred.

Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

166 Cal. App. 4th 1438 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 2008

Med. v. Raines (D.C. Cir. 2008) 383 U.S. App.D.C. 52 [ 534 F.3d 779 ].) A board must “do more than passively rubber-stamp the decisions of the active managers.” (Barr v. … (Kelly v.

Chazen v. Centennial Bank

61 Cal. App. 4th 532 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 1998

Sheldon Brown (hereafter Brown), both appeal from judgments of dismissal entered upon orders sustaining without leave to amend demurrers to their first amended complaints. … Co. v.

MHC Financing Limited Partnership Two v. City of Santee

23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 622 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 2005

(Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 695 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 363 , 889 P.2d 557 ].) MHC relies on Lesher Communications, Inc. v. … (Pala Band of Mission Indians v. Board of Supervisors (1997) 54 Cal. App ,4th 565, 585 [ 63 Cal.Rptr.2d 148 ]; In re Portnoy (1942) 21 Cal.2d 237, 242 [ 131 P.2d 1 ].)

Bank of California v. University of Southern California

211 Cal. App. 2d 75 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1962

(Estate of Platt, 21 Cal.2d 343, 352 [ 131 P.2d 825 ]; Meyer v. State Board of Equalization, 42 Cal.2d 376, 381 [ 267 P.2d 257 ] ; Ziganto v. Taylor, 198 Cal.App.2d 603, 606 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 229 ].) … (Estate of Zilke, supra, 115 Cal.App. 63 ; Bowden v. Brown, 200 Mass. 269 [ 86 N.E. 351 ] ; Brown v. Condit, 70 N.J. Eq. 440 [ 61 A. 1055 ] ; Duncan v. Higgins, 129 Conn. 136 [ 26 A.2d 849 ] ; Horton v.

Raub v. Lee

181 Cal. App. 2d 529 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1960

In construing section 580b, our Supreme Court said in Brown v. … (Brown v. Jensen, supra.) Appellants seek to distinguish the Brown case because the deed of trust which was foreclosed was for a construction loan.

Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa Mesa

126 Cal. App. 3d 330 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1981

(See, e.g., Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan (1980) 27 Cal.3d 855, 864-866 [167 *336 Cal.Rptr. 820, 616 P.2d 802 ], cert. den. (1981) 450 U.S. 918 [ 67 L.Ed.2d 344 , 101 S.Ct. 1362 ]; White v. … Campen v. Greiner (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 836, 843 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 525 ]; Mueller v. Brown (1963) 221 Cal.App.2d 319, 324-325 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 474 ].)

Floyd v. Tierra Grande Development Co.

51 Cal. App. 654 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1921

Sufficient to illustrate the principle of law as here announced, see Dover v. Pittsburg Oil Co., 143 Cal. 501 ; [ 77 Pac. 405 ]; Wisp v. Hazard, 66 Cal. 459 , [ 6 Pac. 91 ]. … (Pope v. Armsby Co., 111 Cal. 159 , [ 43 Pac. 589 ]; Ballard v. Nye, 138 Cal. 588 , [ 72 Pac. 156 ].)

MacLeod v. Superior Court

115 Cal. App. 2d 180 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1952

(Tone v. Superior Court, 111 Cal.App.2d 110, 112 [ 244 P.2d 13 ] ; see, also, Strauss v. Superior Court, 36 Cal.2d 396, 400 [ 224 P.2d 726 ], and Demaree v. Superior Court, 10 Cal.2d 99, 103 [ 73 P.2d 605 ].) … In Kutner-Goldstein Co. v.

Conservatorship of Buchanan

78 Cal. App. 3d 281 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1978

People v. Terrell, 138 Cal.App.2d 35 [ 291 P.2d 155 ]; People v. Dorsey, 43 Cal.App.3d 953 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 362 ]). … Code, § 1752; *292 see also Guardianship of Brown, 16 Cal.3d 326 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 10 , 546 P.2d 298 ]).

People v. Malouf

135 Cal. App. 2d 697 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1955

(People v. Fitzpatrick, 80 Cal. 538, 541 [ 22 P. 215 ].) … (See People v. Gould, 111 Cal.App.2d 1, 7 [ 243 P.2d 809 ]; People v. O’Shaughnessy, 135 Cal.App. 104, 110-111 [ 26 P.2d 847 ].)

Three G Distillery Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

46 Cal. App. 2d 498 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1941

App. (2d) 391 [ 48 Pac. (2d) 71 ]; Vitale v. City of Los Angeles, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 704 [ 57 Pac. (2d) 993 ]; Whitmore v. Brown, 207 Cal. 473 [ 279 Pac. 447 ]; Willmon v. Powell, 91 Cal. … It was there held that under the act the board of education had power to levy a tax for public school purposes. We do not believe this case to be similar or controlling.

Tucker v. Roach

163 Cal. App. 3d 1051 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1985

Petitioner 1 appeals from a judgment denying her petition for a writ of mandate designed to set aside a reassignment in her position with respondent school board. … (Hentschke v. Sink (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 19 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 549 ].) The Legislature has, however, given to administrators certain rights in connection with removal from an administrative post.

People v. Woods

133 Cal. App. 2d 187 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 1955

As stated in People v. … (Rochin v. California, supra, 342 U.S. 165 .) ” (People v. Cahan, 44 Cal.2d 434, 447 [ 282 P.2d 905]; see also People v. Martinez, 130 Cal.App.2d 54 [ 278 P.2d 26 ].)