Case law

Mojtahedi v. Vargas

228 Cal. App. 4th 974 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 8, 2014

(Brown v. Superior Court (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 320, 328 (Brown) quoting, Carroll v. … .”]; Winchester Mystery House, LLC v.

Vessey & Co., Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.

210 Cal. App. 3d 629 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1989

Further, we must set aside Board decisions and orders which rest on “erroneous legal foundations.” (Labor Board v. Brown (1965) 380 U.S. 278, 292 [ 13 L.Ed.2d 839, 849 , 85 S.Ct. 980 ].) … (Labor Board v. Mackay Co., supra, 304 U.S. 333, 345 [ 82 L.Ed. 1381, 1389 ].)

Hillman v. Britton

111 Cal. App. 3d 810 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1980

The board charged with issuance of such permits (board of police commissioners) contended petitioners lacked standing in the absence of a rejected application for a permit. … Brown (G. A.), P.

State Water Resources Control Board Cases

39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 189 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2006

(Central Delta Water Agency v. State Water Resources Control Board, supra, No. 309539.) … (Shamsian v.

Conroy v. Spitzer

83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 443 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1999

Facts In 1996, Conroy and Spitzer were candidates for a seat on the Orange County Board of Supervisors. … (See Beilenson v.

People v. Groenig

57 Cal. App. 495 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1922

Code, secs. 31, 971; People v. Nolam, 144 Cal. 75 [ 77 Pac. 774 ].) … (People v. Plyler, 121 Cal. 160, 163 [ 53 Pac. 553 ]; People v. Fitzgerald, 138 Cal. 39, 45 [ 70 Pac. 1014 ]; White v. Disher, 67 Cal. 402 [ 70 Pac. 826 ]; People v. Lon Yeck, 123 Cal. 246 [ 55 Pac. 984 ]; People v.

Hignell v. Gebala

90 Cal. App. 2d 61 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1949

“A case on appeal must be disposed of upon the issues presented in the court below. ” (Jacobs v. Board of Dental Examiners, 24 Cal.App.2d 359, 361 [ 75 P.2d 96 ].) The lease provided: “21. … Devonshire v. Langstaff, 10 Cal.App.2d 369, 372 [ 51 P.2d 902 ]; Buhman v. Nickels & Brown Bros., 1 Cal.App. 266 [ 82 P. 85 ].) Defendant refused to accept this notice but is bound by it.

Theriault v. Cal. State Personnel Board CA4/2

California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 2020

This interpretation finds support in Brown v. State Pers. … (Brown v. State Pers. Bd. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1151, 1163.)7 7 Plaintiff cites Brown v. State Pers.

Rocray v. Pasadena City Lines, Inc.

159 Cal. App. 2d 265 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1958

The court in Music v. Southern Pac. … v.

Teferi v. Ethiopian Sports Federation in North America CA2/4

California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 2016

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 723, fn. omitted (Brown).) A. … (Brown, supra, at p. 745.) More recently, in Taus v.

Shenouda v. Veterinary Med. Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 2018

(Foreman & Clark Corp. v. … (See, e.g., Griffiths v. Superior Court (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 757, 772; Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1986) 189 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1053; Bryce v.

Barnaby v. Barnaby

100 Cal. App. 195 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 1929

In Ryan v. … (Brown v. Weldon, 71 Cal. 393 [ 12 Pac. 280 ]; Tehama County v. Bryan, 68 Cal. 57 [ 8 Pac. 673 ; Harnish v. Bramer, 71 Cal. 155 [ 11 Pac. 888 ].) ” And in Ohio Electric Car Co. v.

O'Gan v. King City Joint Union High School District

3 Cal. App. 3d 641 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1970

(Maloney v. Rath (1968) 69 Cal.2d 442, 447 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 386 ]; Knell v. Morris (1952) 39 Cal.2d 450 [ 247 P.2d 352 ]; Brown v. … (Knell v. Morris, supra, 39 Cal.2d 450, 456-457.)

Agnew v. City of Culver City

147 Cal. App. 2d 144 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1956

Lynch v. … Young, 136 Cal.App. 699, 702 [ 29 P.2d 440 ]; Vaughn v. Board of Police Gommrs., 59 Cal.App.2d 771 [140 P.2d 130]; Edwards & Browne Coal Co. v.

MODERN PAINT & BODY SUPPLY, INC. v. State Bd. of Equalization

104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 784 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 6, 2001

(See Kaiser Steel Corp. v. State Board of Equalization (1979) 24 Cal.3d 188, 194 [ 154 Cal.Rptr. 919 , 593 P.2d 864 ].) In Kaiser Steel Corp. v. … Board literature received by Modem in 1989 included a copy of the amended regulation. The Board has not waived the position that the regulation was amended. (See Mangini v. R. J.

Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. Emmerson

268 Cal. App. 2d 628 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 1969

BROWN (H. C.), J. This is an appeal from a judgment granting an injunction against excess use of an easement. It is the third appeal in this case. Respondent Kerr Land & Timber Co. … The appellate court in the first appeal (Kerr v.

Swan v. Smith

102 Cal. App. 541 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1929

(Williams v. Lockwood, 175 Cal. 598, 601 [ 166 Pac. 587, 588 ].) … (Freeman v. Donohoe, 65 Cal. App. 65, 81, 94 [ 223 Pac. 431 ].)

Levitt v. Faber

20 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 758 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 1937

(McPheeters v. Board of Medical Examiners, (1930) 103 Cal. App. 297, 300 [ 284 Pac. 938 ].) … See Wineblood v. Payne, (1928) 129 Okl. 103 [ 263 Pac. 669 ] ; Hale v. Brown, (1880) 59 N. H. 551 [ 47 Am. Rep. 224 ] ; Coburn v. Kerswell, (1852) 35 Me. 126 .

People v. Monroe

12 Cal. App. 4th 1174 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 1993

Statutory Scheme In People v. … United States v.

Findley v. Justice Court

62 Cal. App. 3d 566 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1976

(See Barsky v. Board of Regents (1954) 347 U.S. 442, 448 [ 98 L.Ed. 829, 837-838 , 74 S.Ct. 650, 654 ].) As tested by these standards, the challenged statute is not impermissibly vague. … (Broadrick v. Oklahoma (1973) 413 U.S. 601, 610-611 [ 37 L.Ed.2d 830, 838-839 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2915 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Franson, J., concurred.