Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.68s

  • In Re Lugo

    164 Cal. App. 4th 1522 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 2008

    (See Hornung v. … to protection under the Due Process Clause." ( Board of Pardons v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Invicta Plastics, U.S.A., Ltd. v. Superior Court

    120 Cal. App. 3d 190 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1981

    Moreover, in Brown v. … Rule 1600.5(f) was adopted after the decision in Brown v. Engstrom . The other two cases cited by petitioner as reiterating the principle, State of California v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Lally v. Kuster

    48 Cal. App. 355 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1920

    (Lally v. Kuster, 177 Cal. 783 , [ 171 Pac. 961 ].) … (Sanchez v. Neary, 41 Cal. 487 ; Millar v. Millar, 175 Cal. 797 , [Ann. Cas. 1918E, 184, L. R. A. 1918B, 415, 167 Pac. 394 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Breakzone Billiards v. City of Torrance

    97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 467 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2000

    Board of Permit Appeals (1967) 66 Cal.2d 34, 46 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 672 , 423 P.2d 824 ]; McDonald’s Systems of California, Inc. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 525, 539 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 26 ]; Lagrutta v. … (Russian Hill Improvement Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, 66 Cal.2d 34, 46; McDonald’s Systems of California, Inc. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, 44 Cal.App.3d 525, 539 ; Lagrutta v.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Valero Refining Co. etc. v. Bay Area Air Quality etc.

    California Court of Appeal · May 28, 2020

    America v. … Union, Local 1000 v. Brown (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 252, 275.) “The wisdom and expediency of the choices made by the political branches are not subject to judicial recalibration.” (Ibid.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schoendorf v. U.D. Registry, Inc.

    118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 313 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 2002

    (See Medical Board v. Superior Court (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 1001 , 1017 & fn. 47 [ 106 Cal.Rptr.2d 381 ].) 3. … (See Krain v. Medical Board (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1416, 1426 [ 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 586 ].) 4.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Barney v. Girn CA4/3

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2026

    Filed 2/9/26 Barney v. … (See, e.g., Farley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People v. Sibrian

    3 Cal. App. 5th 127 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 7, 2016

    (a); People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 892, 900 [16 Cal.Rptr.3d 447, 94 P.3d 574].) … (Brown, at p. 155.)

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Mojtahedi v. Vargas

    228 Cal. App. 4th 974 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 8, 2014

    (Brown v. Superior Court (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 320, 328 (Brown) quoting, Carroll v. … .”]; Winchester Mystery House, LLC v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • People v. Hurst

    256 Cal. App. 2d 89 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1967

    (People v. Roberts, 47 Cal.2d 374, 379 [ 303 P.2d 721 ]; People v. Brooks, 234 Cal.App.2d 662, 667 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 661 ]; People v. Dickenson, 210 Cal.App.2d 127, 135 [ 26 Cal.Rptr. 601 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • County of Alameda v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

    153 Cal. App. 3d 499 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1984

    {National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co. (1951) 340 U.S. 361 [ 95 L.Ed. 337 , 71 S.Ct. 337 ].) Federal courts have applied the remedy of Gullett Gin to cases involving employment discrimination: Brown v. A.J. … In United States v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Barnaby v. Barnaby

    100 Cal. App. 195 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 1929

    In Ryan v. … (Brown v. Weldon, 71 Cal. 393 [ 12 Pac. 280 ]; Tehama County v. Bryan, 68 Cal. 57 [ 8 Pac. 673 ; Harnish v. Bramer, 71 Cal. 155 [ 11 Pac. 888 ].) ” And in Ohio Electric Car Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kirchmann v. Lake Elsinore Unified School District

    57 Cal. App. 4th 595 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 3, 1997

    (Pickering v. Board of Education (1968) 391 U.S. 563, 574 [ 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1737 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811, 820 ].) … Brown Middle School and a contracted employee of Francis & Anderson. [f] As you know, she was one of the persons on the interview panel.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Yazdi v. Dental Board of Cal. CA2/1

    California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 2020

    Filed 10/6/20 Yazdi v. Dental Board of Cal. … (Brown v. Gordon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 667.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People v. Ngo CA4/2

    California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2023

    (People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 328.) By contrast, the “rational basis” inquiry is not limited to the purposes of the challenged law. … (Kasler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Waterman

    102 Cal. App. 516 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1929

    Bank v. … The case of Freeman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Water Resources Control Board Cases

    39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 189 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2006

    (Central Delta Water Agency v. State Water Resources Control Board, supra, No. 309539.) … (Shamsian v.

    Cited 144 timesPublished
  • Conroy v. Spitzer

    83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 443 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1999

    Facts In 1996, Conroy and Spitzer were candidates for a seat on the Orange County Board of Supervisors. … (See Beilenson v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Myers v. Patterson

    196 Cal. App. 3d 130 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1987

    (Brown v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3d 509, 522 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 584 , 487 P.2d 1224 ].) … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 5 Cal.3d 509, 521 .) Plaintiffs did not substantially comply with section 4005.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Swan v. Smith

    102 Cal. App. 541 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1929

    (Williams v. Lockwood, 175 Cal. 598, 601 [ 166 Pac. 587, 588 ].) … (Freeman v. Donohoe, 65 Cal. App. 65, 81, 94 [ 223 Pac. 431 ].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.