Case law

Munson v. City of Eureka CA1/2

California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 2025

State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind (1967) 67 Cal.2d 536, 541.) … The parties agree that the de novo standard of review applies to a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer is sustained without leave to amend.2 (Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081; Brown v.

In Re Lugo

164 Cal. App. 4th 1522 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 2008

(See Hornung v. … to protection under the Due Process Clause." ( Board of Pardons v.

Scott-Memorial Baptist Church v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control

260 Cal. App. 2d 100 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1968

BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … State Board of Equalization, 60 Cal.2d 441, 456 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 872 , 386 P.2d 496 ]; California State Emp. Assn. v. Trustees of Cal.

Phillips v. Harper

60 Cal. App. 2d 298 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 1943

(Stacey v. Hayes, 31 Cal.App.2d 422 [ 88 P.2d 165 ]; Robertson v. Brown, 37 Cal.App.2d 189 [ 99 P.2d 288 ].) The testimony of James indicates that he had no recollection of the collision itself. … Fowler, 3 Cal.2d 420 [ 45 P.2d 194 ] ; Lennon v. Woodbury, 3 Cal.App.2d 595 [ 40 P.2d 292 ].) In Rode v.

Zanten v. Superior Court

214 Cal. App. 2d 510 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1963

(Stockton School District v. Wright, 134 Cal. 64, 68 [ 66 P. 34 ]; Meyer v. Board of Trustees, 195 Cal. App.2d 420, 430 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].) Our interpretation of the subject statute abides the foregoing rules. … J., and Brown (G.), J., concurred.

Conservatorship of Buchanan

78 Cal. App. 3d 281 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1978

People v. Terrell, 138 Cal.App.2d 35 [ 291 P.2d 155 ]; People v. Dorsey, 43 Cal.App.3d 953 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 362 ]). … Code, § 1752; *292 see also Guardianship of Brown, 16 Cal.3d 326 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 10 , 546 P.2d 298 ]).

Owens v. County of Los Angeles

220 Cal. App. 4th 107 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 2013

Huskinson, Brown & Heidenreich, Paul E. Heidenreich and David W.T. Brown for Plaintiff and Appellant Larry Pitts Jones Day, Elwood Lui, Brian D. Hershman and Erica L. … (Windsor Pacific LLC v. Samwood Co., Inc. (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 263, 273.) ―A settlement agreement is simply a contract.‖ (Hernandez v. Board of Education (2004) 126 Cal.App.4th 1161, 1176 (Hernandez).)

Carrera v. Bertaini

63 Cal. App. 3d 721 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1976

In Fuentes v. … Brown (G. A.), concurred.

Southern Cal. Edison Co. v. WKRS.'COMP. APP. BD.

58 Cal. App. 4th 766 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1997

(Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Board (1978) 22 *770 Cal.3d 829,843 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 888 , 587 P.2d 684 ].) … (See Witt v. Jackson, supra, 57 Cal.2d 57 ; County of San Diego v. *772 Sanfax Corp. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 862, 872-873 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 638 , 568 P.2d 363 ]; Abdala v.

People v. Christian J.

155 Cal. App. 3d 276 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1984

Relying principally on Brown v. … (See Brown v. Superior Court, supra, at pp. 1061-1062.) Failing that, the minor waived Judge Vandegrift’s disqualification. 1 .

People v. Elkus

59 Cal. App. 396 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 1922

(Maynard v. Board of Canvassers, 84 Mich. 228 [11 L, R. A. 332, 47 N. W. 756 ]; concurring opinion in State v. Thompson, 21 N. D. 426 [ 131 N. W. 231 ].) In Maynard v. … In Coffin v. Board of Election Commrs., 97 Mich. 188 [21 L. R. A. 662, 56 N.

Estate of Malgor

77 Cal. App. 2d 535 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 1947

(Golden *540 Gate Undertaking Co. v. Taylor, 168 Cal. 94 -101 [ 141 P. 922 , Ann.Cas. 1915 D 742, 52 L.R.A.N.S. 1152 ].) … (Foley v. Broeksmit (1903), 119 Iowa 457 [ 93 N.W. 344 , 97 Am.St.Rep. 324 , 60 L.R.A. 571 ] ; Burgess & Walter v. Thomas’ Administrator (1937), 219 Ky. 399 [ 292 S.W. 1085 ] ; Wiles Bros. & Co. v.

Yang v. Board of Registered Nursing CA2/1

California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 2020

Filed 10/27/20 Yang v. … (See Brown v. American Bicycle Group, LLC (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 665, 673–675.)

Zaremberg v. Superior Court

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 723 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 2004

(Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 695 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 363 , 889 P.2d 557 ].) Consistent with this policy, we recently observed, “[t]he ballot box is the sword of democracy. … (Brennan v.

United California Bank v. Behrends

251 Cal. App. 2d 720 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1967

(Cockerell v. Title Ins. & Trust Co., 42 Cal.2d 284, 291 [ 267 P.2d 16 ].) … The facts in the case at bench are very different from those recited in Ford v. Bushard, 116 Cal. 273 [ 48 P. 119 ] and Sterling Adjustment Co. v. Laher Auto Spring Co., 116 Cal.App. 100 [ 2 P.2d 408 ].

Smith v. Union Oil Co.

241 Cal. App. 2d 338 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 1966

Smith v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. (D.C. W.D. La. 1965) 243 F.Supp. 130 ; and, by implication, Williamson v. Daspit Bros. Marine Divers, Inc. (5th Cir. 1964) 337 F.2d 337 ; De Gaetano v. … Lipschutz (3d Cir. 1964) 327 F.2d 42, 49 ; Brown v. Poland (10th Cir. 1963) 325 F.2d 984, 986 ; Silverii v. Kramer (3d Cir. 1963) 314 F.2d 407, 413 ; Meehan v.

San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of Merced CA5

California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2013

(Southern California Edison Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1972) 7 Cal.3d 652, 659, fn. 8; Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. Wade, supra, at p. 129.) … (See § 54952.6 [defining “„action‟” under the Brown Act]; see also Boyle v. City of Redondo Beach (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1118.)

People v. Hurst

256 Cal. App. 2d 89 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1967

(People v. Roberts, 47 Cal.2d 374, 379 [ 303 P.2d 721 ]; People v. Brooks, 234 Cal.App.2d 662, 667 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 661 ]; People v. Dickenson, 210 Cal.App.2d 127, 135 [ 26 Cal.Rptr. 601 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred.

Albillo v. Intermodal Container Services, Inc.

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 350 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 2003

Previously, the named appellants had filed individual actions against respondents, one in superior court and one before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). … Fund v.

Goldman v. Wilsey Foods, Inc.

216 Cal. App. 3d 1085 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1989

Fair Oaks Fire Protection System (1987) 43 Cal.3d 148 , and are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.” This appeal followed. … As explained in Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477, 485-486 [ 208 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 691 P.2d 272 ], “The FEHA establishes a comprehensive scheme for combating employment discrimination. [Citations.]