Case law

Roger E. Smith, Inc. v. SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.

89 Cal. App. 4th 638 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 2001

Instead, Resco urges us to follow a seemingly contrary holding from Division Four of the First District Court of Appeal in Nicholson-Brown, Inc. v. … City of San Jose (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 526 [ 133 Cal.Rptr. 159 ] (Nicholson-Brown), disapproved on other grounds in Bullis v. Security Pac. Nat.

Parker v. Dumke

117 Cal. App. 3d 237 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1981

unreasonable” under Rible v. … Brown (G. A.), P. J., concurred.

Owens v. County of Los Angeles

220 Cal. App. 4th 107 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 2013

Huskinson, Brown & Heidenreich, Paul E. Heidenreich and David W.T. Brown for Plaintiff and Appellant Larry Pitts Jones Day, Elwood Lui, Brian D. Hershman and Erica L. … (Windsor Pacific LLC v. Samwood Co., Inc. (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 263, 273.) ―A settlement agreement is simply a contract.‖ (Hernandez v. Board of Education (2004) 126 Cal.App.4th 1161, 1176 (Hernandez).)

County of Alameda v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

153 Cal. App. 3d 499 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1984

{National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co. (1951) 340 U.S. 361 [ 95 L.Ed. 337 , 71 S.Ct. 337 ].) Federal courts have applied the remedy of Gullett Gin to cases involving employment discrimination: Brown v. A.J. … In United States v.

Wells v. One2One Learning Foundation

10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 456 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 2004

(See, e.g., Brown v. Compton Unified School Dist. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 114 , 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 171 ; Chevlin v. Los Angeles Community College Dist. (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 382 , 260 Cal.Rptr. 628 ( Chevlin ); Tirpak v. … Whether in tort, contract, or fraud, this claim is barred by the doctrine of educational malfeasance. ( Brown v.

Tensfeldt v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 691 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 20, 1998

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) denied the second claim. … Consequently, the Board did not address the issue of statutory compensability of Tensfeldt’s injury incurred while playing basketball. The dissent cited the Board’s holding in Zenith Insurance Company v. Workers’ Comp.

Carrera v. Bertaini

63 Cal. App. 3d 721 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1976

In Fuentes v. … Brown (G. A.), concurred.

Abernathy v. Superior Court

157 Cal. App. 4th 642 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2007

(Rich v. State Board of Optometry (1965) 235 Cal.App.2d 591, 604 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 512 ].) … (Brown v. Superior Court (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 989, 992 [ 274 Cal.Rptr. 442 ].)” (County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court, supra, 18 Cal.App.4th at p. 594 .)

In Re Lugo

164 Cal. App. 4th 1522 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 2008

(See Hornung v. … to protection under the Due Process Clause." ( Board of Pardons v.

Munson v. City of Eureka CA1/2

California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 2025

State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind (1967) 67 Cal.2d 536, 541.) … The parties agree that the de novo standard of review applies to a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer is sustained without leave to amend.2 (Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081; Brown v.

People v. Dorsey

46 Cal. App. 3d 706 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1975

(People v. … People v.

Scott-Memorial Baptist Church v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control

260 Cal. App. 2d 100 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1968

BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … State Board of Equalization, 60 Cal.2d 441, 456 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 872 , 386 P.2d 496 ]; California State Emp. Assn. v. Trustees of Cal.

Phillips v. Harper

60 Cal. App. 2d 298 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 1943

(Stacey v. Hayes, 31 Cal.App.2d 422 [ 88 P.2d 165 ]; Robertson v. Brown, 37 Cal.App.2d 189 [ 99 P.2d 288 ].) The testimony of James indicates that he had no recollection of the collision itself. … Fowler, 3 Cal.2d 420 [ 45 P.2d 194 ] ; Lennon v. Woodbury, 3 Cal.App.2d 595 [ 40 P.2d 292 ].) In Rode v.

Zanten v. Superior Court

214 Cal. App. 2d 510 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1963

(Stockton School District v. Wright, 134 Cal. 64, 68 [ 66 P. 34 ]; Meyer v. Board of Trustees, 195 Cal. App.2d 420, 430 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].) Our interpretation of the subject statute abides the foregoing rules. … J., and Brown (G.), J., concurred.

Zaremberg v. Superior Court

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 723 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 2004

(Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 695 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 363 , 889 P.2d 557 ].) Consistent with this policy, we recently observed, “[t]he ballot box is the sword of democracy. … (Brennan v.

Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.

43 Cal. App. 162 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 5, 1919

A. 647, 60 Pac. 439 ]; Siebe v. Hendy Machine Works, 86 Cal. 390, 392 , [ 25 Pac. 14 ].) ” In Brown v. … should be ratified at a regular meeting of the board.

Southern Cal. Edison Co. v. WKRS.'COMP. APP. BD.

58 Cal. App. 4th 766 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1997

(Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Board (1978) 22 *770 Cal.3d 829,843 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 888 , 587 P.2d 684 ].) … (See Witt v. Jackson, supra, 57 Cal.2d 57 ; County of San Diego v. *772 Sanfax Corp. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 862, 872-873 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 638 , 568 P.2d 363 ]; Abdala v.

People v. Christian J.

155 Cal. App. 3d 276 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1984

Relying principally on Brown v. … (See Brown v. Superior Court, supra, at pp. 1061-1062.) Failing that, the minor waived Judge Vandegrift’s disqualification. 1 .

People v. Elkus

59 Cal. App. 396 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 1922

(Maynard v. Board of Canvassers, 84 Mich. 228 [11 L, R. A. 332, 47 N. W. 756 ]; concurring opinion in State v. Thompson, 21 N. D. 426 [ 131 N. W. 231 ].) In Maynard v. … In Coffin v. Board of Election Commrs., 97 Mich. 188 [21 L. R. A. 662, 56 N.

Estate of Malgor

77 Cal. App. 2d 535 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 1947

(Golden *540 Gate Undertaking Co. v. Taylor, 168 Cal. 94 -101 [ 141 P. 922 , Ann.Cas. 1915 D 742, 52 L.R.A.N.S. 1152 ].) … (Foley v. Broeksmit (1903), 119 Iowa 457 [ 93 N.W. 344 , 97 Am.St.Rep. 324 , 60 L.R.A. 571 ] ; Burgess & Walter v. Thomas’ Administrator (1937), 219 Ky. 399 [ 292 S.W. 1085 ] ; Wiles Bros. & Co. v.