Case law

Brown v. Reliable Iron Foundry, Inc.

174 Cal. App. 2d 294 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1959

Declared to be the law of this state (Garcia v. … The article makes reference to Hoff v. Natural Refining Products Co., 38 N.J.Super. 222 [ 118 A.2d 714 ], wherein are collected eases at various age levels, including Pierce v.

Brown v. Surety Co. of Pacific

122 Cal. App. 3d 614 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1981

In FAJ, Inc. v. … The liability imposed is not that for fraudulent acts of a licensee but rather “fraudulent act by the licensee as a contractor.” (§ 7116; see Barry v. Contractors State License Board. (1948) 85 Cal.

Brown v. State Department of Health

86 Cal. App. 3d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1978

(Steinmetz v. Cal. State Board of Education (1955) 44 Cal.2d 816, 822-823 [ 285 P.2d 617 ]; People v. Burns (1888) 75 Cal. 627, 630-631 [ 17 P. 646 ]; People v. … (Furnish v. Board of Medical Examiners (1957) 149 Cal.App.2d 326, 331 [ 308 P.2d 924 , 309 P.2d 493 ]; Rinaldo v. Board of Medical Exmrs. (1935) 5 Cal.App.2d 345, 352 [ 42 P.2d 724 ].)

Brown v. California State Lottery Commission

232 Cal. App. 3d 1335 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1991

(Hochberg v. New York City Off-Track Bet. Corp., supra, 343 N.Y.S.2d at p. 655 ; see Valois v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass’n (Fla.App. 1982) 412 So.2d 959 ; Seder v. … Nor does Brown qualify as a donee beneficiary, for the State neither intended to bestow a gift on him nor did it seek to assign an enforceable right against Southland. (See Martinez v.

Brown v. County of Los Angeles

77 Cal. App. 2d 814 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1947

Brown and wife, conveyed it by deed to Clarence W. Brown (son of William J. Brown) and his wife, plaintiffs herein. … (Keese v. Beardsley, 190 Cal. 465 [ 213 P. 500 , 26 A.L.R. 1538 ].)

Rand v. Board of Psychology

206 Cal. App. 4th 565 · California Court of Appeal · May 10, 2012

(Shea v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 81 Cal.App.3d at p. 575 .) … (Franz v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance, supra, 31 Cal.3d at p. 143 ; Shea v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 81 Cal.App.3d at p. 576 .)

Furtado v. State Personnel Board

212 Cal. App. 4th 729 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 2013

“We do not reweigh the evidence; we indulge all presumptions and resolve all conflicts in favor of the board’s decision.” (Camarena v. State Personnel Bd., supra, at p. 701.) … (See Lui v.

Molina v. Board of Administration

200 Cal. App. 4th 53 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 2011

(O’Connor v. … (O’Connor v. State Teachers’ Retirement System, supra, 43 Cal.App.4th at p. 1620 ; Prentice v. Board of Administration (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 983, 989 [ 69 Cal.Rptr.3d 167 ] (Prentice).)

County of San Diego v. Brown

80 Cal. App. 3d 297 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1978

Brown relies upon Jackson v. … In Cleveland Board of Education v.

Union of American Physicians v. Brown

195 Cal. App. 4th 691 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2011

(Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court, supra, 57 Cal.2d at p. 455 .) Second, legislation is retroactive when it changes the legal consequences of past conduct by imposing new or different liabilities (Elsner v. … (Snyder v. Michael’s Stores, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 991, 1003, fn. 4 [ 68 Cal.Rptr.2d 476 , 945 P.2d 781 ]; California Labor Federation v.

Geoghegan v. Retirement Board

222 Cal. App. 3d 1525 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 1990

(Grant v. Board of Retirement (1967) 253 Cal.App.2d 1020, 1021 [ 61 Cal.Rptr. 791 ]; Retry v. Board of Retirement (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 124, 129 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 891 ]; Summerford v. … Traub v. Board of Retirement, supra, 34 Cal.3d at p. 798 .)

People ex rel. Brown v. Puritec

153 Cal. App. 4th 1524 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 2007

(Brown-Forman Distillers v. N. Y. Liquor Auth. (1986) 476 U.S. 573, 578-579 [ 90 L.Ed.2d 552 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 ] (Brown-Forman); Bronco, supra, 129 Cal.App.4th at p. 1016 ; Ferguson, supra, 94 Cal.App.4th at p. 1261.) … (Kasky, supra, 27 Cal.4th at p. 952; see Central Hudson, supra, 447 U.S. at p. 566 ; Board of Trustees, State Univ. of N. Y. v. Fox (1989) 492 U.S. 469, 480 [ 106 L.Ed.2d 388 , 109 S.Ct. 3028 ].)

Brough v. Governing Board

118 Cal. App. 3d 702 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 1981

(Degener v. Governing Board, supra, 67 Cal.App.3d 689.) … (Paulus v. Board of Trustees (1976) 64 Cal.App.3d 59 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 220 ].)

Professional Engineers in California Government v. Brown

229 Cal. App. 4th 861 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 2014

(See Brown v. … California Attorneys, etc. v. Brown (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 119 [ 125 Cal.Rptr.3d 463 ] is also inapposite.

Brown v. Presley of Southern California

213 Cal. App. 3d 612 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 1989

Brown appeals from the order striking her complaint and dismissing with prejudice case No. EAC42690 as a sanction for her earlier failure to comply with a discovery order. … She contends: “A) The trial court’s first order compelling Brown to undergo post-arbitration discovery was plain error and an abuse of discretion.

Capital Research & Management Co. v. Brown

53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 770 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 2007

(Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 989 .) 6 In Zuri-Invest AG v. NatWest Finance Inc. … (Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co. (N.D.Cal. 2004) 314 F.Supp.2d 953, 963 ; and see Zuri-Invest AG v.

Franceschi v. Franchise Tax Board

1 Cal. App. 5th 247 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 8, 2016

BS154331) v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Joanne B. O’Donnell, Judge. Affirmed. … (Franceschi) petitioned the superior court for a writ directing the then-serving members of the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB)—Betty Yee, Jerome E.

Blazevich v. State Board

191 Cal. App. 3d 1121 · California Court of Appeal · May 11, 1987

We must determine if the findings of the board are supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5, subd. (c); Bixby v. … Brian further cites Krouse v.

Bradley v. Medical Board

56 Cal. App. 4th 445 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1997

(Neely v. … In Wyatt v.

Watkins v. Pension Board

91 Cal. App. 542 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1928

same rank formerly held by the petitioner as superintendent of the city fire-alarm system; that the city electrician is performing the same duties, and, therefore, under the decisions of this court in the cases of Klench v. … Board of Pension Fund Commissioners of the City of Stockton, 79 Cal. App. 171 249 Pac. 46 ], Douglas v. Pension Board of the City of Sacramento, 75 Cal. App. 335 [ 242 Pac. 756 ], and Aitken v. Roche et al., 48 Cal.