Case law

Howard Lewis Beach v. Superior Court

11 Cal. App. 3d 1032 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1970

Officers Cecil, Brown and Jackson went to the address, an apartment, to investigate. Officer Brown knocked and identified himself to Mrs. Nichols who invited the officers into the apartment. … Without objection Officer Brown testified Mrs.

Schefke v. Superior Court

136 Cal. App. 2d 715 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1955

(To the same effect, Brown *718 v. Cleveland Tractor Co. (1933), 265 Mich. 475 [ 251 N.W. 557 ].) Other jurisdictions have held as did the court in McDonald v. … Board of Water Comrs., supra, 97 A. 336 , even though that parking was on the highway itself. The alternative writ is discharged and the petition denied. Peters, P.

Golden State Water Co. v. Casitas Municipal Water District

235 Cal. App. 4th 1246 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 2015

Brown (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1449, 1465 & fn. 2). … (Professional Engineers in California Government v. Brown (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 861, 872-873; see Galbiso v.

People Ex Rel. Sepulveda v. Highland Federal Savings & Loan

14 Cal. App. 4th 1692 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1993

Grant (5th Cir. 1991) 943 F.2d 1453, 1461-1463 [no ongoing association shown]; Martin v. Brown (W.D.Pa. 1990) 758 F.Supp. 313, 322 [insufficient ongoing unit shown]; Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Mutual Trading Corp. … (D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 19 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].)

People v. Hale

82 Cal. App. 2d 827 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1947

The attorney general discusses the following authorities on the point: People v. Lee Chuck, 78 Cal. 317 [ 20 P. 719 ] ; People v. Grider, 13 Cal.App. 703 . [ 110 P. 586 ]; People v. … Brown, 81 Cal.App. 226 . [ 253 P. 735 ]; People v. Edgar, 34 Cal.App. 459, 467 [ 167 P. 891 ]; People v. Schmidt, 33 Cal.App. 426, 439 [ 165 P. 555 ] ; and also quotes from 8 Cal.Jur., p. 264, refers to People v.

Anthony v. Snyder

10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 505 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 2004

This court in Presenting Jamul v. Board of Supervisors (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 665, 670-671 [ 282 Cal.Rptr. 564 ], discussed the purpose of section 66499.37. … (Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 866 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 575 ].)

Browne v. Fernandez

140 Cal. App. 689 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1934

In Howard v. Howard, 132 Cal. … To the same effect see Walker v. Bacon, 132 Cal. App. 625 [ 23 Pac. (2d) 520 ]; Turner v. Standard Oil Co., 134 Cal. App. 622 [ 25 Pac. (2d) 988 ].

Simons v. City of Los Angeles

72 Cal. App. 3d 924 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1977

(Mountain Defense League v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 65 Cal.App.3d 723, 730 ; Stoddard v. … As was said by the court in Brown v. City of Berkeley, 57 Cal.App.3d 223 , at pages 230-231 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 1 ]: “Ordinances are invalid if they conflict with the charter. (Acton v.

Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San Francisco

186 Cal. App. 3d 814 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1986

(Rich v. State Board of Optometry (1965) 235 Cal.App.2d 591 , 604 . . .; Moyer v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 10 Cal.3d at p. 230 .) … (People v. Knowles, supra, 35 Cal.2d, at p. 183 ; Rich v. State Board of Optometry, supra, 235 Cal.App.2d, at p. 604 .)” (California Teachers Assn. v.

Crain v. Electronic Memories and Magnetics Corp.

50 Cal. App. 3d 509 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1975

Said agreement was ratified the same day by a majority of DSC’s board of directors. (Three of the board’s five directors approved the sale: defendants Rosenberg and Zechter, and Robert Crain.) … (See also Brown v. Halbert, 271 Cal.App.2d 252, 272 [ 76 Cal.Rptr. 781 , 38 A.L.R.3d 718 ]; Remillard Brick Co. v.

Callnon v. Callnon

7 Cal. App. 2d 676 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1935

(Brown v. Brown, supra; De Godey v. Godey, 39 Cal. 157, 163 ; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Welch, 202 Cal. 312, 315 [ 260 Pac. 545 ]; Tarien v. Katz, 216 Cal. 554, 558 [ 15 Pac. (2d) 493 , 85 A. L. R. 334]; Taylor v. … (Allen v. McCrary, 220 Cal. 508, 510 [ 31 Pac. (2d) 388 ]; Brown v. Brown, supra.)

Weisman v. Clark

232 Cal. App. 2d 764 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1965

BROWN (R.M.), J. Appellant appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent denying appellant relief under a complaint based upon a breach of contract. … In Buchanan v.

People v. Shaparnis

147 Cal. App. 3d 190 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1983

In Brady v. … (People v. Ruthford, supra, 14 Cal.3d at pp. 408-409.)

Lewis v. Superior Court

77 Cal. App. 3d 844 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1978

Brown v. Brown, siipra, 170.Cal. 1, involved a default judgment of divorce. … (See Brown v. Brown, supra, 170 Cal. at pp. 8, 9.)

Amerigraphics, Inc. v. Mercury Casualty Co.

182 Cal. App. 4th 1538 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 2010

Volper called Brown and told him he wanted to make a claim for normal operating expenses. Brown responded that there was no such coverage. … (See Bonds v.

American Can Co. v. Agricultural Insurance

12 Cal. App. 133 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 8, 1909

This case is similar to Taylor v. Phoenix Ins. … Co. v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Co., 34 Or. 228 , [ 55 P. 435 ]; Dinning v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 68 Ill. 414 .) The case of Gold v. Sun Ins. Co., 73 Cal. 217 , [ 14 P. 786 ], does not aid the plaintiff.

Cvrcek v. State Personnel Bd.

247 Cal. App. 2d 827 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1967

That this rule applies to a review of findings of fact made by the State Personnel Board is attested by Neely v. … The court upheld the State Personnel Board’s finding that the agent’s lying constituted dishonesty. In Board of Education v.

People v. White

85 Cal. App. 241 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1927

(People v. Lum Yit, 83 Cal. 130 [ 23 Pac. 228 ].) … (People v. Green, 22 Cal. App. 45 [ 133 Pac. 334 ]; People v. Walker, 69 Cal. App. 475 [ 231 Pac. 572 ]; People v. Gibbs, 98 Cal. 661 [ 33 Pac. 630 ]; People v. Kahler, 26 Cal.

People v. Wells

68 Cal. App. 2d 476 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1945

(People v. Gonzales, supra; People v. Wolfrom, 15 Cal.App. 732, 736 [ 115 P. 1088 ]; 8 R.C.L. 288, § 309.) … (People v. Ralph, 24 Cal.2d 575, 578 [ 150 P.2d 401 ]; People v. McNabb, 3 Cal.2d 441, 456 [ 45 P.2d 334 ]; In re Lee, 177 Cal. 690 [ 171 P. 958 ]; People v. Meyers, 31 Cal.App.2d 515 [ 88 P.2d 212 ] ; People v.

California Chiropractic Ass'n v. Human Relations Agency

91 Cal. App. 3d 141 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1979

Board of Election (1969) 394 U.S. 802, 808-809 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 739, 745 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 ]; Dandridge v. Williams (1970) 397 U.S. 471, 485 [ 25 L.Ed.2d 491, 501-502 , 90 S.Ct. 1153 ].) … In Dandridge v.