Case law

People v. Cheatham

50 Cal. App. 3d 592 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 1975

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … Proc., § 1858; People v. Gilbert (1969) 1 Cal.3d 475, 480 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 462 P.2d 580 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d at p. 645 .)

People v. Sean A.

191 Cal. App. 4th 182 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 2010

(Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483, 493 [ 98 L.Ed. 873 , 74 S.Ct. 686 ].) ‘Some modicum of discipline and order is essential if the educational function is to be performed.’ (Goss v. … While the record in this case is limited as compared to those in the civil rights cases of Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. Acton, supra, 515 U.S. 646 *189 ([Vernonia) and Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist.

Hart v. Olson

68 Cal. App. 2d 657 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1945

Co. v. Clark, 81 Cal.App. 546 [ 254 P. 306 ]; O’Shea v. Sicotte, 52 Cal.App. 331, 334 [198 P.812]; Estate of Reinicke, 44 Cal.App.2d 271, 277 [ 112 P.2d 311 ]; Brooks v. Whitman, 122 Cal.App. 660 [ 10 P.2d 1007 ].) … (Holland v. Kelly, 74 Cal.App. 576, 579 [ 241 P. 579 ].)

Armstrong v. Day

103 Cal. App. 465 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1930

The allowance of such amendments rests in the sound discretion of the trial court (Hancock v. Board of Education, 140 Cal. 554 [ 74 Pac. 44 ]) and may be made at any stage of the trial (Gartlan v. G. A. … Cudahy Packing Co., 189 Cal. 335 [ 208 Pac. 125 ]; Griffith v. Oak Ridge Oil Co., 190 Cal. 389 [ 212 Pac. 913 ]; Power v. Crown Stage Co., 82 Cal. App. 660 [ 256 Pac. 457 ]; Davis v. Brown, 92 Cal.

Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.

43 Cal. App. 162 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 5, 1919

A. 647, 60 Pac. 439 ]; Siebe v. Hendy Machine Works, 86 Cal. 390, 392 , [ 25 Pac. 14 ].) ” In Brown v. … should be ratified at a regular meeting of the board.

People v. Stephen L.

162 Cal. App. 3d 257 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1984

People v. … (Terry v. Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1, 27 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 909 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ].) We think that the circumstances more than warranted the cursory search of Minor. (See People v.

Smith v. WORKMEN'S COMP. APP. BD. HAROLD EUGENE SNOOK

245 Cal. App. 2d 292 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1966

The award was made by the Industrial Accident Commission, now Imown as the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, which will be referred to herein as the Commission. … Brown, P. J., concurred. A finding upon an ultimate fact implies a finding of every supportive inte”mc(liate or probative fact supported by the evidence, including inferences. (Consolidated Steel Corp. v.

Anderson v. California Faculty Assn.

25 Cal. App. 4th 207 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1994

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 173-174 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ].) … In applying the doctrine, the courts “ ‘seek to avoid conflicting adjudications which may interfere with [a labor] board’s ability to carry out its statutory role, yet to permit court action when the board cannot provide

People v. Espinoza

226 Cal. App. 4th 635 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 2014

(People v. Lynch (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 353, 359 [ 146 Cal.Rptr.3d 811 ]; see People v. … Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 328-330 [ 142 Cal.Rptr.3d 824 , 278 P.3d 1182 ] [no equal protection violation in prospective application for former § 4019, granting increased custody credits].)

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Amador Water Agency

California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 2019

II, § 9; Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 697, fn. 3 (Rossi) [1911 adoption].) … (Santos v. Brown (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 398, 410 (Santos).) We accordingly conclude the term “tax” in the general referendum provision (art. II, § 9) encompasses water service fees.

People v. Caldwell

California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 2018

On March 21, 2013, Caldwell filed a section 4900 claim with the California State Victim’s Compensation and Government Claims Board (now Victim’s Compensation Board (Board)) (claim). … “In Ohio v.

People v. Roe

148 Cal. App. 3d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1983

has been committed to the custody of the Director of Corrections, the court may, within 120 days of the date of commitment on its own motion, or at any time upon the recommendation of the Director of Corrections or the Board … Brown (Gerald), P.J., and Cologne, J., concurred.

People v. Clark

8 Cal. App. 5th 863 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 2017

People v. Brown (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 1502 (Brown) is instructive. … (Brown, at pp. 1511-1513.)

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Suden

54 Cal. App. 2d 575 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1942

Brown’s separate estate to pay-special legacies and obligations of the Andrew A. Brown estate. $11,000 of this sum was used to pay legacies of the Andrew A. Brown estate. This sum was credited to the Ada I. … Jur., p. 610; Grady v. Porter, 53 Cal. 680, 686 ; Estate of Grant, 131 Cal. 426, 429 [ 63 Pac. 731 ]; Estate of Simonton, 183 Cal. 53, 56 [ 190 Pac. 442 ] ; Estate of Wear, 20 Cal. (2d) 124, 128 [ 124 P. (2d) 12 ].)

Christiana v. Rose

100 Cal. App. 2d 46 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1950

This is the direct holding of Brown v. … v.

Bacon v. Bacon

21 Cal. App. 2d 540 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1937

Manford Brown, and conveyances were to be made from time to time by the trustee to persons designated by Brown. The complaint alleges, and the answer denies, that at the time plaintiff and defendant R. C. … As was said in Wilson v. Anderson, 109 Cal.

Kaye v. Mount La Jolla Homeowners Assn.

204 Cal. App. 3d 1476 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1988

In Christin v. … Work, J. and Brown (Gerald), J., * concurred.

People v. Williams

172 Cal. App. 2d 345 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1959

The claim of perjury in the testimony of Officer Brown calls on us to weigh the evidence, a thing which we cannot do. (People v. Newland, 15 Cal.2d 678, 681 [ 104 P.2d 778 ].) … Likewise the assertion of inherent improbability in Brown’s testimony finds no support in the transcript. (People v. Huston, 21 Cal.2d 690, 693 [ 134 P.2d 758 ]; People v.

Motevalli v. Los Angeles Unified School District

18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 562 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 9, 2004

(D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 19 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].) Motevalli pled in her complaint that on June 8, 2001, she was notified “her contract would not be renewed.” … Brown Act (Brown Act; Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.). [Fn. omitted.] . . .

Merenda v. Superior Court

3 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1992

Brown, for Brown’s alleged sexual assault and battery of plaintiff. Brown filed a chapter 7 petition for bankruptcy. ( 11 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.) … Bureau v.