Case law

People v. Stender

47 Cal. App. 3d 413 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 8, 1975

(People v. Brown, 11 Cal.3d 784, 787 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 426 , 523 P.2d 226 ]; People v. Stanworth, 11 Cal.3d 588, 596, 598-601 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 250 , 522 P.2d 1058 ].) … (People v. Brown, supra, at p. 789, fn. 6 .)

Lovinger v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

62 Cal. App. 3d 240 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1976

Plaintiff *242 waited in the station for 30 minutes after receiving the baggage checks and before boarding his bus, but testified he did not see the provision limiting liability. … Plaintiff’s reliance upon dicta in two California decisions (Bauer v. Jackson, 15 Cal.App.3d 358 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 43 ]; Muelder v.

People v. Lloyd

216 Cal. App. 3d 1425 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1989

Calvin leaned forward toward the floor board of the car, raised back up, then got out of the car, carrying a small brown paper bag. Officer Burns asked him for his driver’s license and car registration. … In United States v.

Southern California Rapid Transit District v. Superior Court

30 Cal. App. 4th 713 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1994

(Monell v. New York City Dept. of Soc. Serv. (1978) 436 U.S. 658, 690 [ 56 L.Ed.2d 611, 635 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 ].) This *727 is a claim which may be prosecuted in state court. (Brown v. … (Pickering v. Board of Education, supra, 391 U.S. at p. 568 [ 20 L.Ed.2d at p. 817 ].)

Gitmed v. General Motors Corp.

26 Cal. App. 4th 824 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1994

The facts here are similar to those in Brown v. Brown (1959) 169 Cal.App.2d 54 [ 337 P.2d 140 ]. Brown involved a demurrer which was sustained with 10 days leave to amend. … The answer, filed after the time has elapsed, may, in the court’s discretion . . . , be stricken out on motion of the plaintiff, and then the default may be entered.’ ” (Brown v. Brown, supra, 169 Cal.App.2d at p. 57 .)

In Re Marriage of Hug

154 Cal. App. 3d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1984

This contention ignores the treatment of contractual rights adopted by the court in Brown. … (See In re Marriage of Fonstein (1976) 17 Cal.3d 738 [ 131 Cal.Rptr. 873 , 552 P.2d 1169 ]; see also Weinberg v.

Ames v. Irvine Co.

246 Cal. App. 2d 832 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1966

Daley, supra, 93 Cal. 664, 671 ; Wilcoxson v. Sprague, 51 Cal. 640, 642 ; cf. Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; Harris v. … Mosk v. City of Santa Barbara, 192 Cal.App.2d 342, 349 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. 423 ]; Tibbs v. Smart & Final Iris Co., 152 Cal.App.2d 618, 623 [ 313 P.2d 636 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Brown, P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred.

American Can Co. v. Agricultural Insurance

27 Cal. App. 647 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1915

Code, secs. 1582, 1583; Howard v. Daly, 61 N. Y. 362 , [ 19 Am. Rep. 285 ]; Adams v. Lindsell, 1 B. & Ald. 681, [106 Eng. Reprint, 250].) … Proc., sec. 1963, subd. 20; Union Construction Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 163 Cal. 298 , [ 125 Pac. 242 ]; Hall v. Brown, 58 N. H. 93; Gate City Abstract Co. v. Post, 55 Neb. 742 , [ 76 N. W. 471 ].)

TWC STORAGE, LLC v. State Water Resources Control Bd.

185 Cal. App. 4th 291 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 2010

We exercise independent review on the question of whether the Regional Board provided TWC with a fair hearing. (Rosenblit v. Superior Court (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1434, 1442 [ 282 Cal.Rptr. 819 ].) A. … TWC relies heavily on City of Modesto Redevelopment Agency v.

Cocoa AJ Holdings, LLC v. Schneider

California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2025

(Park v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1057, 1067 (Park).) … (Ojjeh v. Brown (2019) 43 Cal.App.5th 1027, 1037 (Ojjeh).) To prove defamation, Cocoa must show a publication that is false, defamatory, unprivileged, and has a natural tendency to injure or that causes special damage.

Wofford Heights Associates v. County of Kern

219 Cal. App. 2d 34 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 1963

In Williams v. … Brown (R. M.), J., and Stone, J., concurred.

People v. Marcus T.

89 Cal. App. 4th 468 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2001

(People v. Birks (1998) 19 Cal.4th 108, 117 [ 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 848 , 960 P.2d 1073 ]; People v. Sanchez, supra, 24 Cal.4th at p. 988 .) Under these tests, appellant’s contention fails. … (See People v. Birks, supra, 19 Cal.4th at p. 133, fn. 7.)

League of Women Voters v. Countywide Criminal Justice Coordination Committee

203 Cal. App. 3d 529 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 3, 1988

Brown (1962) 37 N.J. 189 [ 180 A.2d 136 ] follows that holding, finding no impropriety per se in the passage of a resolution directing an attorney to prepare a legislative bill, but concludes the board of education at issue … (County of Alameda v. Janssen, supra, 16 Cal.2d at p. 281 ; Board of Supervisors v. Dolan, supra, 45 Cal.App.3d at p. 243 .)

Browne v. Fernandez

140 Cal. App. 689 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1934

In Howard v. Howard, 132 Cal. … To the same effect see Walker v. Bacon, 132 Cal. App. 625 [ 23 Pac. (2d) 520 ]; Turner v. Standard Oil Co., 134 Cal. App. 622 [ 25 Pac. (2d) 988 ].

Interinsurance Exchange v. Campbell

187 Cal. App. 3d 242 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1986

Exch. v. Brown, supra, 252 Cal.App.2d 120 at p. 124.) … Exchange v. Stratton, supra, 145 Cal.App.3d 612 at p. 616 , quoting from Farmers Ins. Exch. v. Brown, supra, 252 Cal.App.2d 120 at p. 123 .)

People v. Shaparnis

147 Cal. App. 3d 190 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1983

In Brady v. … (People v. Ruthford, supra, 14 Cal.3d at pp. 408-409.)

HUB CITY SOLID WASTE SERVICES, INC. v. City of Compton

186 Cal. App. 4th 1114 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 2010

Brown v. Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 1549, 1567 [ 90 Cal.Rptr.3d 644 ].) … (Brown v.

Western Mobilehome Assn. v. County of San Diego

16 Cal. App. 3d 941 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1971

(See Dobbins v. Board of Supervisors of Yuba County, 5 Cal. 414 ; 9 People v. McGuire, 32 Cal. 140 .) 10 *949 In either event the two statutes should be reconciled if reasonably it may be done. … We hold, therefore, that section 510 empowered Board to enact the ordinance in question. The judgment is reversed with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of County. Brown (Gerald), P.

People v. Caldwell

California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 2018

On March 21, 2013, Caldwell filed a section 4900 claim with the California State Victim’s Compensation and Government Claims Board (now Victim’s Compensation Board (Board)) (claim). … (People v.

Beckley v. Bd. of Admin., CalPERS

California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 2013

(Molina v. Board of Administration, Etc. (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 53, 61; O’Connor v. State Teachers’ Retirement System (1996) 43 Cal.App.4th 1610, 1620– 1621.) … For this, CalPERS relies on Mansperger v. Public Employees’ Retirement System (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 873 (Mansperger) and Hosford v. Board of Administration (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 854 (Hosford).