Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.63s
Church v. San Mateo County Assessment Appeals Bd.
California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 2020
The state Board of Equalization issues a handbook to “serve as a primary reference and basic guide for assessors.” (Sky River LLC v. County of Kern (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 720, 735; SHC Half Moon Bay v. … (People v. Santamaria (1994) 8 Cal.4th 903, 912.)
Cited 0 timesPublished16 Cal. App. 4th 919 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 18, 1993
(See, e.g., Cobler v. Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & Associates (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 518, 527 [ 265 Cal.Rptr. 868 ]; Banwait v. Hernandez (1988) 205 Cal.App.3d 823, 826-828 [ 252 Cal.Rptr. 647 ]; Ray Wilson Co. v. … (See Cobler v. Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & Associates, supra, 217 Cal.App.3d at pp. 527-529.)
Cited 58 timesPublished42 Cal. App. 2d 629 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 1941
Later the court made an order authorizing the guardian to expend the sum of $125 per month for the room, board and care of the incompetent. … In her account the guardian claimed credit for the sum of $1159.39 in addition to the monthly allowance which had been allowed for room, board and care.
Cited 3 timesPublished200 Cal. App. 3d 1426 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 1988
Opinion BROWN (G. … Code, § 18500 et seq.; Miller v. State of California, supra, 18 Cal.3d 808, 813 ; Boren v. State Personnel Board, supra, 37 Cal.2d 634, 641 .)
Disapproved on other grounds by Quigley v. Garden Valley Fire Protection Dist., 249 Cal. Rptr. 3d 548 (2019)Cited 68 timesPublished83 Cal. App. 627 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1927
a reconveyance from Brown to Lovey. … In Rogers v. Rogers, 3 Paige (N. Y.), 379, and in Wakeman v. Grover, 4 Paige (N.
Overruled by Monterey S.P. Partnership v. W. L. Bangham, Inc., 49 Cal. 3d 454 (1989)Cited 7 timesPublishedLooney v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.
16 Cal. App. 4th 521 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 1993
In Brown v. … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 994 , fn. omitted.)
Cited 29 timesPublished92 Cal. App. 185 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1928
Brown, and two grandchildren, Bernard V. Goe and Eleanor Wolf Caroe, the children of a deceased daughter. In her will she designated several devisees and legatees, but did not mention in any way her grandchildren. … Brown is entitled to receive twenty-five hundred shares of the capital stock of Five Thirty-six Oil Co., a corporation; provided, however, that when the said Grace C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedService Employees' International Union, Local No. 22 v. Roseville Community Hospital
24 Cal. App. 3d 400 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1972
(Bettencourt v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1917) 175 Cal. 559, 561 [ 166 P. 323 ]; Accord, Napa State Hospital v. Dasso (1908) 153 Cal. 698, 703 [ 96 P. 355 ]; see People v. … J., and Regan, J., concurred. * Assigned by the Chairman of the Judicial Council. 1 In general, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov.
Cited 10 timesPublishedLovinger v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
62 Cal. App. 3d 240 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1976
Plaintiff *242 waited in the station for 30 minutes after receiving the baggage checks and before boarding his bus, but testified he did not see the provision limiting liability. … Plaintiff’s reliance upon dicta in two California decisions (Bauer v. Jackson, 15 Cal.App.3d 358 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 43 ]; Muelder v.
Cited 0 timesPublished193 Cal. App. 3d 161 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1987
Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (See Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners (1941) 17 Cal.2d 534, 538 [ 110 P.2d 992 ]; Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 184, 198 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 881 ]; Camacho v.
Cited 11 timesPublished23 Cal. App. 3d 361 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1972
Board of Fire Underwriters, 29 Cal.2d 34, 41 [ 172 P.2d 867 ]; Custodio v. Bauer, 251 Cal. App.2d 303, 310 [ 59 Cal. Rptr. 463 , 27 A.L.R.3d 884 ]; Mercer v. Elliott, 208 Cal. App.2d 275, 277-278 [ 25 Cal. Rptr. 217 ].) … BROWN (H.C.), J. I dissent. The majority opinion follows the reasoning of Norman v. Murphy, 124 Cal.
Cited 8 timesPublished135 Cal. App. 2d 371 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1955
In Runyon v. … (See People v. Brown, 61 Cal.App. 748 [ 216 P. 58 ] ; People v. Montgomery, 47 Cal.App.2d 1, 10 [ 117 P.2d 437 ].)
Cited 30 timesPublishedObbard v. State Bar of California
California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 2020
Brown, Jr. (2013) p. 14.) … Brown, Jr. (2013) p. 14.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia State University, Fresno Ass'n v. Superior Court
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 870 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 2001
Brown Act (§ 54950 et seq.). [Citation.] Indeed, secrecy is ‘antithetical to a democratic system of “government of the people, by the people [and] for the people.” ’ [Citation.]” (Poway Unified School Dist. v. … (See Coppernoll v. Board of Directors (1983) 138 Cal.App.3d 915, 918 [ 188 Cal.Rptr. 394 ]; Wanee v.
Cited 42 timesPublishedTseheridis v. Aronas Corp. CA4/3
California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 2025
Filed 10/1/25 Tseheridis v. Aronas Corp. … Brown & Stedman and Edwin B. Brown for Defendants and Appellants. Law Offices of Darren P. Trone and Darren P. Trone for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDotConnectAfrica Trust v. Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & Nos.
California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 2021
In 2003, the board established a Board Governance Committee, which is a seven-person subset of the 20-person board. … (See Bucur v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLyons v. Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office
231 Cal. App. 4th 1499 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2014
(Humane Soc. of the United States v. State Board of Equalization (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 349, 361.) … (Gould v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedSan Francisco Lathing Co. v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
144 Cal. App. 2d 181 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 27, 1956
Lawrence Brown, 384 Post, S. F. … (Ransom v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co., 43 Cal.2d 420, 427 [ 274 P.2d 633 ]; Pierre v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 22 Cal.App.2d 346 [ 70 P.2d 985 ]; Wills v. Policy Solders Life Ins.
Cited 14 timesPublished19 Cal. App. 89 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1912
Respondent relies upon the case of Kavanaugh v. … (Pennie v. Reis, 80 Cal. 266 , [ 22 Pac. 176 ]; Pennie v. Reis, 132 U. S. 464 , [ 33 L. Ed. 426 , 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 149].)
Cited 11 timesPublishedOdom v. L.A. Community College Dist.
California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 2025
To support this contention plaintiff cites People v. … (Pinter-Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna