Case law

American National Bank v. Peacock

165 Cal. App. 3d 1206 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1985

Petitioners in Silver v. Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ], sought by writs of mandate to secure reapportionment of both houses of the Legislature. … (Younger v. Superior Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 102, 113 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 674 , 577 P.2d 1014 ]; In re Rodriguez (1975) 14 Cal.3d 639, 651 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 552 , 537 P.2d 384 ]; Board of Osteopathic Examiners v.

Cocoa AJ Holdings, LLC v. Schneider

California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2025

(Park v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1057, 1067 (Park).) … (Ojjeh v. Brown (2019) 43 Cal.App.5th 1027, 1037 (Ojjeh).) To prove defamation, Cocoa must show a publication that is false, defamatory, unprivileged, and has a natural tendency to injure or that causes special damage.

Ames v. Irvine Co.

246 Cal. App. 2d 832 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1966

Daley, supra, 93 Cal. 664, 671 ; Wilcoxson v. Sprague, 51 Cal. 640, 642 ; cf. Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; Harris v. … Mosk v. City of Santa Barbara, 192 Cal.App.2d 342, 349 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. 423 ]; Tibbs v. Smart & Final Iris Co., 152 Cal.App.2d 618, 623 [ 313 P.2d 636 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Brown, P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred.

Guyer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

24 Cal. App. 2d 499 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1938

Defendant Brown immediately applied the emergency brakes to the train. Meanwhile Dr. … Oil Co. v. United Railroads, 191 Cal. 96, 101 [ 215 Pac. 72 ] ; Locke v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp., 10 Cal. App. (2d) 478, 480 [ 51 Pac. (2d) 1111 ] ; Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co., 138 Cal.

Wright v. Buzzine

180 Cal. App. 2d 426 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1960

Brown (1913), 55 Colo. 430 [ 135 P. 800 ], and Lockwood v. Halsey (1889), 41 Kan. 166 [ 21 P. 98 ], for the contrary position, these cases are not persuasive. … , who supervised that section of the board which handles water right applications, permits and licenses, testified that the extent of the Pope Valley’s appropriated water rights, granted by the board, constitutes 75 acre

People v. Armstrong

268 Cal. App. 2d 324 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1968

Defendant cites the case of People v. Brown (1961) 198 Cal.App.2d 253, 266 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 884 ], to support his view that the two offenses are part of one transaction. … The Brown case lends no support to defendant’s argument. Defendant in the Brown case was convicted of assault, rape, a violation of 288a, ■ and robbery.

People v. Mixon

129 Cal. App. 3d 118 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1982

(People v. Willis (1939) 30 Cal.App.2d 419, 423 [ 86 P.2d 670 ]; see also People v. Otis (1959) 174 Cal.App.2d 119, 127-128 [ 344 P.2d 342 ]; United States v. … The present case is similar to People v.

Bahen v. Furley

44 Cal. App. 134 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1919

(Calmon v. Sarraille, 142 Cal. 638 , [ 76 Pac. 486 ].) … that because he may not have been present when Furley or Plumer, or both, made all the false statements to plaintiff (notwithstanding the fact that the three were jointly interested in the transaction with plaintiff—Corson v.

American Trust & Banking Co. v. Union Security Co.

43 Cal. App. 126 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 3, 1919

(Sp reckels v. … (Kady v. Purser, 131 Cal. 552, at 559 , [ 82 Am. St. Rep. 391 , 63 Pac. 844 ]; Foorman v. Wallace, 75 Cal. 552 , [ 17 Pac. 680 ]; Hunter v. Watson, 12 Cal. 377 , [ 73 Am. Dec. 543 ].)

Myers v. California State Board of Equalization CA2/3

California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 2023

Filed 4/24/23 Myers v. … Co. v.

Western Mobilehome Assn. v. County of San Diego

16 Cal. App. 3d 941 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1971

(See Dobbins v. Board of Supervisors of Yuba County, 5 Cal. 414 ; 9 People v. McGuire, 32 Cal. 140 .) 10 *949 In either event the two statutes should be reconciled if reasonably it may be done. … We hold, therefore, that section 510 empowered Board to enact the ordinance in question. The judgment is reversed with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of County. Brown (Gerald), P.

Wofford Heights Associates v. County of Kern

219 Cal. App. 2d 34 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 1963

In Williams v. … Brown (R. M.), J., and Stone, J., concurred.

Armstrong v. Svoboda

240 Cal. App. 2d 472 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 1966

(Pemberton v. Barber, 199 Cal.App.2d 534, 537-538 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 784 ]; Hawk v. City of Newport Beach, 46 Cal.2d 213, 219 [ 293 P.2d 48 ]; Kalfus v. Fraze, 126 Cal.App.2d 99 [ 971 P.2d 573 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred. * Assigned by the Chairman of the Judicial Council.

Mushroom Tunnel Farms, Inc. v. Friedeberg

238 Cal. App. 2d 727 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1965

Co. v. Board of Comrs., 114 Kan. 156 [ 217 P. 315, 317 ].) In any event, cases applicable to railroads as a special class do not control in our ease since defendant is not conducting a railroad business. … J., and Brown (R. M.), J., concurred.

People v. Wilkins

135 Cal. App. 2d 371 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1955

In Runyon v. … (See People v. Brown, 61 Cal.App. 748 [ 216 P. 58 ] ; People v. Montgomery, 47 Cal.App.2d 1, 10 [ 117 P.2d 437 ].)

Gilbert v. Superior Court

193 Cal. App. 3d 161 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1987

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (See Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners (1941) 17 Cal.2d 534, 538 [ 110 P.2d 992 ]; Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 184, 198 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 881 ]; Camacho v.

Kemmerer v. County of Fresno

200 Cal. App. 3d 1426 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 1988

Opinion BROWN (G. … Code, § 18500 et seq.; Miller v. State of California, supra, 18 Cal.3d 808, 813 ; Boren v. State Personnel Board, supra, 37 Cal.2d 634, 641 .)

Automobile Salesmen's Union v. Eastbay Motor Car Dealers, Inc.

10 Cal. App. 3d 419 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1970

Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage etc. … J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred. Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied October 9, 1970.

State of California v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

44 Cal. App. 4th 128 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1996

(Greener v. Worker’s Comp. … (See Dyer v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1376 [ 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 30 ], involving state Franchise Tax Board worker; see also Stemler v. Workers’ Comp.

Bayer v. Suttle

23 Cal. App. 3d 361 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 7, 1972

Board of Fire Underwriters, 29 Cal.2d 34, 41 [ 172 P.2d 867 ]; Custodio v. Bauer, 251 Cal. App.2d 303, 310 [ 59 Cal. Rptr. 463 , 27 A.L.R.3d 884 ]; Mercer v. Elliott, 208 Cal. App.2d 275, 277-278 [ 25 Cal. Rptr. 217 ].) … BROWN (H.C.), J. I dissent. The majority opinion follows the reasoning of Norman v. Murphy, 124 Cal.