Case law

Rush v. State Teachers' Retirement System

California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 2021

Proc., §§ 1085, 1094.5) to reverse the board’s decision. … (Betts v. Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859, 863.) “Such a pension right may not be destroyed, once vested, without impairing a contractual obligation of the employing public entity.” (Ibid.)

Conrad v. Medical Bd. of California

48 Cal. App. 4th 1038 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1996

For example, in *1044 Blank v. … (People v.

Chase v. Kalber

28 Cal. App. 561 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 15, 1915

(See Brown v. City of Galveston, 96 Tex. 1 , [ 75 S. W. 488 ] ; Walker v. City of Spokane, 62 Wash. 312 , [Ann. Cas. 1912C, 994, 113 Pac. 775, 780 ].) … In the very recent case of Hopping v.

Covina-Azusa Fire Fighters Union, Local 2415 v. City of Azusa

81 Cal. App. 3d 48 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1978

(See Kingston v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, supra, 271 Cal.App.2d 549 ; Steen v. Board of Civil Service Commrs. (1945) 26 Cal.2d 716 [ 160 P.2d 816 ]; Code Civ. Proc., § 581d; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2(b).) … (See Davis v. State Board of Optometry (1939) 35 Cal.App.2d 428 [ 95 P.2d 959 ].)

Marsh v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.

257 Cal. App. 2d 574 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 2, 1968

(Raischell & Cottrell, Inc. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board, 249 Cal.App.2d 991 , 995 *579 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 159 ]; see, also, Colonial Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. … The basic rules of procedure require the board to give res judicata effect to its final decisions. (Dow Chemical Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board, 67 Cal.2d 483, 491 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 757 , 432 P.2d 365 ].)

In Re Rosenkrantz

116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 69 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 2002

to judicial review. ( Board of Pardons v. … Browning (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 513, 521 , 74 Cal.Rptr. 155 , emphasis added, cited with approval in People v.

Davis v. Davis

120 Cal. App. 4th 1007 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 2004

On January 1, 2002, the City of Los Angeles Department of Fire and Police Pensions Board (the Pension Board) offered eligible members the option of transferring from their current tier to tier 5, under which contributions … Co. v. Superior Court (1990) 51 Cal.3d 807, 821-822 [ 274 Cal.Rptr. 820 , 799 P.2d 1253 ].)” (Tanner v. Tanner (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 419, 424-425 [ 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 204 ].)

Valencia v. Board of Registered Nursing CA1/4

California Court of Appeal · May 28, 2021

.”]; Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal Com. (1982) 33 Cal.3d 158, 169–172.) Grant v. Board of Medical Examiners (1965) 232 Cal.App.2d 820, cited by the Board, is on point. … BROWN, J. 12

Earley v. Superior Court

95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 57 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2000

(Brown v. West Covina Toyota (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 555, 561 [ 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 85 ] (Brown), disapproved on other grounds in Murillo v. … (See Governing Board [Rialto Unified School Dist.] v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819, 828 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 558 P.2d 1 ]; Rose v.

Cole v. Patricia a. Meyer & Associates, APC

206 Cal. App. 4th 1095 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 2012

(Daniels v. … (See Ampex Corp. v. Cargle (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1569, 1576 [ 27 Cal.Rptr.3d 863 ] [postings on message board spurred by company’s press release]; ComputerXpress, Inc. v.

Mae M. v. Komrosky

California Court of Appeal · May 19, 2025

Sandford (1857) 60 U.S. 393, Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 163 U.S. 537, Brown v. Board of Education (1954) 347 U.S. 483, and including “the roles of civil rights advocates” like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcom X. … v.

Major v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2017

(Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2012) 904 F.Supp.2d 1009, 1025-1026; appeal filed Mar. 10, 2016; Johnson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (D. Mass. 2004) 345 F.Supp.2d 16, 21; Conley v. R.J. … (Boerner v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (8th Cir. 2001) 260 F.3d 837, 848.)

Santa Clarita Org. for Planning etc. v. Abercrombie

California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 2015

v. … Brown v.

In Re Steiner

134 Cal. App. 2d 391 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1955

(Brown v. Superior Court, 70 Cal.App. 732, 735 [ 234 P. 409 ]; In re Cook, 77 Cal. 220, 227 [ 17 P. 923 , 19 P. 431 , 11 Am.St.Rep. 267 , 1 L.R.A. 567 ] ; Grim v. … (Gwinn v. Ryan, 33 Cal.2d 436 [ 202 P.2d 51 ].)” (Herrscher v. Herrscher, 41 Cal.2d 300, 304 [ 259 P.2d 901 ].) See also Steen v. Board of Civil Service Comrs., 26 Cal.2d 716, 727 [ 160 P.2d 816 , 160 A.L.R. 863 ] ; E.

People v. Acevedo

129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 270 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 2003

(People v. Brown (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 596, 599-600 [ 264 Cal.Rptr. 908 ] (Brown).) … As the Brown court observed, “[t]here was no testimony that established the color of the lights.” (Brown, supra, 216 Cal.App.3d at p. 600 .)

Slayton v. Wright

271 Cal. App. 2d 219 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1969

(Brown v. Southern Ry. Co., 204 N.C. 668 [ 169 S.E. 419, 420 ].) … Where no rating has been made by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board [formerly Industrial Accident Commission] of an employee’s permanent injuries, it is impossible for any court to determine the rating; the board has

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons

114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 657 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2002

(See Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 746, 749 , 257 Cal. Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 .) … A "public figure" by choice has placed himself or herself in the "public eye"; such a person is also more able to command media attention to counteract falsehoods published about him or her. ( Brown v.

Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co.

216 Cal. App. 2d 813 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1963

(See also Carpenter v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co., 13 Cal.2d 306, 314 [ 89 P.2d 637 ]; Orwitz v. Board of Dental Examiners, 55 Cal.App.2d 888, 889 [ 132 P.2d 272 ].) … Brown (B.M.), J., concurred. Conley, P. J., deeming himself disqualified, did not participate. Appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied July 31, 1963.

Professional Engineers in California Government v. Department of Transportation

114 Cal. App. 3d 93 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1980

Respondent, employee organization Professional Engineers in California Government (hereinafter PECG), filed a *95 petition on June 21, 1978, for peremptory writ of mandate pursuant to the George Brown Act (hereinafter GBA … (Callie v. Board of Supervisors (1969) 1 Cal.App.3d 13, 18-19 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 440 ].)

Pacific Indem. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

269 Cal. App. 2d 793 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1969

(Steven v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 58 Cal.2d 862, 869, 884 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 172 , 377 P.2d 284 ]; Atlantic Nat. Ins. Co. v. Armstrong, 65 Cal.2d 100, 111-112 [ 52 Cal.Rptr. 569 , 416 P.2d 801 ]; Gray v. Zurich Ins. … and that it contracted to that effect with Brown-Massie; that Brown-Massie intended to obligate itself to provide liability insurance coverage for ear No. 901 and promised California Rent Car it would do so.