Case law

Estate of Hampton

262 Cal. App. 2d 532 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1968

WELLS FARGO BANK, Petitioner and Respondent, v. FRANCES CLARK, Objector and Appellant; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, Claimant and Respondent. Docket No. 24858. … Clark for Petitioner and Respondent. *534 McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen and Albert J. Moorman for Claimant and Respondent. TAYLOR, J.

People v. Makabali

14 Cal. App. 4th 847 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1993

(Id., at p. 216; see also People v. Garcia (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 1369, 1374-1375 [ 278 Cal.Rptr. 421 ].) The Fifth District followed Brown in People v. Osorio, supra, 194 Cal.App.3d 183 . … Finally, the Sixth District recently created a “limited exception” to the Brown rule which is relevant to this case. In People v.

People v. Taylor

46 Cal. App. 3d 513 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1975

He also saw on the floor a knife, screwdriver, flashlight and a pair of brown gloves. … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].)

People v. Jones

180 Cal. App. 3d 509 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1986

Thus, People v. … Thus, in People v.

Unruh v. City Council

78 Cal. App. 3d 18 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1978

(Pickering v. Board of Education, supra, 391 U.S. at p. 568 [ 20 L.Ed.2d at p. 817 ].) … (Adcock v. Board of Education, supra, 10 Cal.3d 60, 66 ; Patterson v. Central Coast Regional Com. (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 833, 842 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 169 ].)

Huddleson v. Huddleson

187 Cal. App. 3d 1564 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1986

(Giovannoni v. … , supra, 15 Cal.3d 838 , and Henn v.

Napa Ass'n of Public Employees v. County of Napa

98 Cal. App. 3d 263 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1979

A memorandum of understanding under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, once approved by the governing body, has the force of a binding agreement. (Glendale City Employees’ Assn., Inc. v. … We assume, since no contention is made to the contrary, that the memoranda at issue in this case were approved by the county board of supervisors.

Gonzales v. California Victim Compensation Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 2023

(Bunnett v. … Superior Court (Brown) (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 948, 952). Second, “factual findings” are typically findings that can be reviewed for substantial evidence (e.g., City of San Marcos v.

Simons v. City of Los Angeles

63 Cal. App. 3d 455 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1976

In Spinks v. … Up to approximately six months prior to trial, they sometimes wore Sam Browne belts and carried batons, and sometimes carried their revolvers in their Sam Browne belts, although these weapons were not loaded.

People v. Senegram

27 Cal. App. 301 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1915

To the same effect is Brown v. State, 40 Tex. Crim. 49 , [ 48 S. … (People v. Thomson, 92 Cal. 506 , [ 28 Pac. 589 ]; People v. Wong Chuey, 117 Cal. 624 , [ 49 Pac. 833 ] ; People v. Mack, 14 Cal. App. 12 , [ 110 Pac. 967 ].)

Raischell & Cottrell, Inc. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.

249 Cal. App. 2d 991 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1967

The appeals board denied reconsideration. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 29 Cal.2d 79, 82 [ 172 P.2d 884 ] ; Lab. Code, § 5500.5; Fireman’s Fund Indem. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 39 Cal.2d 831, 835 [ 250 P.2d 148 ] ; Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc.

People v. Stokes

184 Cal. App. 2d 780 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1960

Brown was awakened by the voice of someone who identified himself as “Stokes” and which voice Brown recognized as that of the appellant. … (People v. Braun, 14 Cal.2d 1 [ 92 P.2d 402 ]; People v. David, 12 Cal.2d 639 [ 86 P.2d 811 ]; People v. Gregor, 141 Cal.App.2d 711 [ 297 P.2d 734 ]; People v. Guiterrez, 152 Cal.App.2d 115 [ 312 P.2d 291 ].)

Hale v. George A. Hormel & Co.

48 Cal. App. 3d 73 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1975

In Peek v. … In Weaver v.

California-American Water Co. v. Marina Coast Water Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 2022

Monterey has a dual governing board structure consisting of the elected Monterey County Board of Supervisors and a Board of Directors appointed by the Board of Supervisors. … (Brantley v. Pisaro (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1591, 1607; see generally Weil & Brown, Cal.

Pathe v. City of Bakersfield

255 Cal. App. 2d 409 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1967

(See also Lowman v. Stafford, 226 Cal.App.2d 31, 36-39 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 681 ] ; Loustalot v. Superior Court, 30 Cal.2d 905 [ 186 P.2d 673 ] ; Buttner v. American Bell Tel. … (Glass v. Ashbury, 49 Cal. 571 ; Cowell v. Martin, 43 Cal. 605 ; Whitmore v. Brown, 207 Cal. 473, 481 [ 279 P. 447 ] ; Zottman v. San Francisco, 20 Cal. 96 [81 Am.Dec. 96].)

Gadd v. McGuire

69 Cal. App. 347 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 23, 1924

A. 755, 28 Pac. 272 ]; Stuckenbruch v. Board of Supervisors, 193 Cal. 506 [ 225 Pac. 857 ]; Pasadena Park Improvement Co. v. Lelande, supra; City of Indianapolis v. Bryan, 188 Ind. 586 [ 125 N. E. 38 ]; Brown v. … (State v. Board of Commrs., 83 Kan. 199 [ 110 Pac. 92 ].)

People v. Maltz

14 Cal. App. 3d 381 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1971

He noticed the bottom board on the outer surface of the garage failed to meet the ground by about 6 inches. … Cunha did not disapprove Brown , but characterized the circumstances in Brown as more suspicious than those in Cunha. (Cunha v.

Valencia v. Board of Registered Nursing CA1/4

California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 2023

Filed 10/30/23 Valencia v. … WE CONCUR: BROWN, P. J. GOLDMAN, J. 5

Ming v. Superior Court

13 Cal. App. 3d 206 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1970

Prince stated to me, ‘In a brown Volkswagen?’ I said, ‘Yes. A brown Volkswagen,’ and he stated, ‘Well, that will be Richard Brown,’ and evidently he had had contact in the past with this subject. Q. … Thus in People v.

City and County of SF v. All Persons Interested etc.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2020

(Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 699, fn. 6.) … J. _________________________ BROWN, J. CCSF v.