Case law

Smith v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.

196 Cal. App. 3d 503 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1987

(Vernon Fire Fighters Ass'n v. … (Beye v. Bureau of National Affairs (1984) 59 Md.App. 642 [ 477 A.2d 1197, 1201 ]; see also Wagner v. Sanders Associates, Inc. (C.D.Cal. 1986) 638 F.Supp. 742, 745 .)

Huskinson & Brown v. Wolf

119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 479 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 2002

In Asdourian v. … Sanchez and Wolf, and which Wolf contracted with Huskinson & Brown to perform. Huskinson & Brown analogizes its situation to that of the plaintiff in Sims v. Charness (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 884 , 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 619 .

Gibbs v. Haight, Dickson, Brown & Bonesteel

183 Cal. App. 3d 716 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 1986

The defendants retained Haight, Dickson, Brown & Bonesteel and Roy Weatherup to represent them in Gibbs’ action. … (Bertero v.

Lute v. Governing Board

202 Cal. App. 3d 1177 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1988

(Henderson v. Board of Education (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 875, 883 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 568 ]; Napa Valley Educators’Assn. v. Napa Valley Unified School Dist., supra, 194 Cal.App.3d at p. 251 .) … As stated in Horn v.

National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Brown

197 Cal. App. 2d 605 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1961

(Hynding v. Home Acc. Ins. Co., 214 Cal. 743, 752 [ 7 P.2d 999 , 85 A.L.R. 13 ]; Reed v. Pacific Indem. Co., 101 Cal.App.2d 151, 159 [ 225 P.2d 255 ].) … Co. v. Snyder-Lynch Motors, 183 Cal.App.2d 574, 580 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 28 ].) In Artukovich v. St. Paul-Mercury Indem.

Bank of America v. Brown

240 Cal. App. 2d 818 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1966

BROWN (Gerald), P. J. The respondent, Bank of America, as executor of the estate of Evelyn J. Brown, petitioned the probate court for instructions and to determine heirship. … Brown with re *821 speet to the property during her lifetime. Mrs. Brown, decedent, held the property in her name alone, both before and during her marriage to Mr.

Brown v. County of Los Angeles

85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 414 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1999

Brown prevailed at trial. … (See Fielder v.

New Zealand Insurance v. Brown

110 Cal. App. 2d 411 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1952

(Kennedy v. Minarets & Western Ry. Co., 90 Cal.App. 563, 574 [ 266 P. 353 ]; Gailbreath v. Homestead Fire Ins. Co., 185 F.2d 361 .) In fact, the evidence can be wholly circumstantial. (Jno. L. Witney, Inc. v. Sierra Ry. … (Hallawell v. Union Oil Co., 36 Cal.App. 672, 681 [ 173 P. 177 ]; Gallichotte v. California Mut. etc. Assn., 4 Cal.App.2d 503, 508 [ 41 P.2d 349 ].)

Mandell-Brown v. Novo Nordisk Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Mar 6, 2025

(Merrill v. Navegar, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 465, 476.) … (b)(3); see Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 554, 568; Batarse v. Service Employees Internat. Union, Local 1000 (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 820, 831–833 [(Batarse)].)” (Rush v.

Service Employees International Union v. Brown

197 Cal. App. 4th 252 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 8, 2011

This is particularly true when the competing considerations are economic (e.g., California Medical Assn. v. Brown, supra, 193 Cal.App.4th 1449, 1464 ; California Grocers Assn. v. … (See California Medical Assn. v. Brown (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1449 [ 123 Cal.Rptr.3d 647 ] for a discussion of one such borrowing.)

Dornell v. Retirement Board

72 Cal. App. 2d 197 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1945

(Brant v. Retirement Board of S. F., 57 Cal.App.2d 721 [ 135 P.2d 396 ] ; Naughton v. Retirement Board of S. F., 43 Cal.App.2d 254 [ 110 P.2d *199 714 ] ; Walker v. … (Brant v. Retirement Board of S. F., supra; Dillard v. City of Los Angeles, 20 Cal.2d 599 [ 127 P.2d 917 ] ; Casserly v. City of Oakland, 215 Cal. 600 [ 12 P.2d 425 ].)

Gromis v. Medical Board

8 Cal. App. 4th 589 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 1992

(Windham v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 461, 469-471 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 566 ]; see also Bekiaris v. Board of Education, supra, 6 Cal.3d 575, 589-590 ; Clerici v. … (Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal.3d at pp. 220-233 [immoral or unprofessional conduct and acts involving moral turpitude]; see also Board of Education v.

Brown v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

247 Cal. App. 4th 275 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016

BROWN, Plaintiff and Appellant, A144339 v. … (Keyes v.

Brown v. Pacific Telephone & Telelegraph Co.

105 Cal. App. 3d 482 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1980

Brown filed a complaint for personal injuries against defendant Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a California corporation, on October 16, 1975. … It was stated in Lopez v.

Ira Garson Realty Co. v. Brown

180 Cal. App. 2d 615 · California Court of Appeal · May 4, 1960

lease give me a price on which you can pay me a full realty board commission of 5%.” … Lundeen Corp. v. Barlow, 120 Cal.App. 391 [ 7 P.2d 1102 ]; Houghton v. Kuehnrich, 46 Cal.App. 469 [ 189 P. 457 ]; and Dowds v.

Brown v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2018

(Kettelle v. Kettelle (1930) 110 Cal.App. 310, 314; Eddie v. Schumacher Wall Board Co. (1926) 79 Cal.App. 318, 322.) … (Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Board of Equalization (2013) 57 Cal.4th 401, 415.)

Haight, Brown & Bonesteel v. Superior Court

234 Cal. App. 3d 963 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1991

(Banerian v. O’Malley (1974) 42 Cal.App.3d 604, 611 [ 116 Cal.Rptr. 919 ].) … (Petrovich v. City of Arcadia (1950) 36 Cal.2d 78 [ 222 P.2d 231 ].)

California School Boards Ass'n v. Brown

192 Cal. App. 4th 1507 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 2011

(California School Boards Assn. v. State of California (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 1183, 1206 [ 90 Cal.Rptr.3d 501 ].) Here, the language is reasonably susceptible of both meanings. … Fund v. State Bd. of Equalization (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1295, 1299-1300 [ 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 526 ]; but see California School Boards Assn. v. State of California, supra, 171 Cal.App.4th at p. 1206 [provision of Cal.

Brown Materials Co., Ltd. v. Angus

20 Cal. App. 2d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1937

In Smith v. … In Howe v.

Brown v. Southern California Edison Co.

120 Cal. App. 102 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1932

The real decision of the question by the court is a decision of fact’, (Zibbell v. Southern Pac. … (Cahill v. Stone & Co., 153 Cal. 571, 574 [19 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1094, 96 Pac. 84, 86 ].) “In Pierce v. United Gas & Elec.