Case law

People v. Morris

237 Cal. App. 2d 773 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1965

(People v. Brown, supra, 49 Cal.2d 577, 591 ; People v. Manago, supra, 230 Cal.App.2d 645, 647 ; People v. Stoltz, 196 Cal.App.2d 258, 264 [ 16 Cal.Rptr. 285 ].) … Greer, supra, 30 Cal.2d 589, 601, 603 ), the condemned purpose of the act (People v. Brown, supra, 49 Cal.2d 577, 590 ; People v.

Fletcher v. San Jose Mercury News

216 Cal. App. 3d 172 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1989

Brown (1980) 447 U.S. 455, 467 [ 65 L.Ed.2d 263, 273 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 ].) This is because speech concerning public affairs is not just self-expression; it is the essence of self-government. (Garrison v. … (Jenoff v. Hearst Corp.

Cruz v. Superior Court

17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 368 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 2004

Wilcox, M.D., Ph.D., who stated he was board certified both in pediatrics and in medical genetics. … Brown, J., did not participate therein.

Granger v. Orange County Bd. Supervisors

168 Cal. App. 2d 274 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1959

The pleadings alleged that the defendant board of supervisors was negotiating for a lease with intervener Dowd. … To paraphrase the language of the Supreme Court in Lenahan v.

Stokes v. Baker

California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2019

Hickman (1967) 66 Cal.2d 841, 849, fn. 6, quoting Silver v. Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845; see also Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. … (b) [providing the same definition for “emergency medical care” and “emergency medical services”]; see also Zavala v. Board of Trustees (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 1755, 1762.)

Southwick v. Contractors State License Board CA1/2

California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 2024

(Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 830, 839; see Code Civ. … A161391, Southwick v. Contractors State License Board, et al. 8

Indus. Indem. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

60 Cal. App. 2d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1997

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) rescinded the WCR’s award against CIGA and substituted a joint and several award against Industrial and SCIF. … Co. v. Ind. Acc.

Calnev Pipe Line Co. v. City of Colton

230 Cal. App. 2d 184 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1964

Peck v. … Board of Supervisors, 32 Cal.App. 495, 504 [ 163 P. 341 ] [storm water districts] ; Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 119 Cal.

City and County of SF v. All Persons Interested etc.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2020

(Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 699, fn. 6.) … J. _________________________ BROWN, J. CCSF v.

Craycroft v. Superior Court

18 Cal. App. 781 · California Court of Appeal · May 3, 1912

Chittenden and Samuel Brown, be and the same is hereby referred, together with the conflicting claims of John P. Kerr, Robert L. Perry, Richard V. Dorsey, Charles Smithwick and Emmet L. … This authority is approved in Clide v.

Munson v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control

248 Cal. App. 2d 598 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1967

On petition of appellant, the ABC Appeals Board reviewed the case and affirmed the order revoking appellant’s license. … In Stoumen v.

Munoz v. Purdy

91 Cal. App. 3d 942 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1979

(Purdy), a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, performed foot surgery on the plaintiff Sonia Munoz on February 16, 1973, at the Paradise Valley Hospital. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ehrenfreund, J., * concurred. Respondent’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 14, 1979. 1 All references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise specified.

Burbank v. National Casualty Co.

43 Cal. App. 2d 773 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1941

Brown’s connection with the transaction is shown to be as follows: A. B. … The reason for requiring prompt notice is well expressed in Purefoy v. Pacific Auto. Indem.

Stinnett v. Tam

198 Cal. App. 4th 1412 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 1, 2011

We have not invented fictitious purposes that could not *1426 have been within the contemplation of the Legislature (see Brown v. … Board of Dental Examiners (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 253, 263 [ 137 Cal.Rptr. 133 ].) The California Supreme Court stated this rule clearly in Palermo v.

Golden v. City of Oakland

49 Cal. App. 3d 284 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1975

Brown, 63 Cal.2d 841 at p. 845 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ].) … State Board of Education, 35 Cal.App.2d 591, 595 [ 96 P.2d 809 ]: “. . .

Yes On 25, Citizens for an On-Time Budget v. Superior Court

189 Cal. App. 4th 1445 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 2010

Com v. … (Epperson, supra, 12 Cal.2d at p. 66 ; see Brennan v. Board of Supervisors (1981) 125 Cal.App.3d 87, 92-93 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 677 ].)

Tri-Cor, Inc. v. City of Hawthorne

8 Cal. App. 3d 134 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1970

It was filed by an independent law firm—Brown & Brown, acting through Maynard J. Brown. … Co. v. Orlando (1968) 262 Cal.App.2d 858 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 702 ]; A. D. Hoppe Co. v. Fred Katz Constr. Co. (1967) 249 Cal.App.2d 154, 158 [ 57 Cal.Rptr. 95 , 25 A.L.R.3d 1162 ].

In Re Cooper

62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 907 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 2007

Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Anya M. … A Governor's review of a Board suitability decision is constitutionally authorized but "subject to procedures provided by statute" (Cal. Const., art. V, § 8, subd. (b)).

Simi Valley Recreation & Park District v. Local Agency Formation Commission

51 Cal. App. 3d 648 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1975

Dist., 22 Cal.App.3d 152, 163 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 212 ]; Mitcheltree v. City of Los Angeles, 17 Cal.App.3d 791, 797 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 76 ]; Van Sicklen v. Browne, 15 Cal.App.3d 122, 126-127 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 786 ]; Stoddard v. … (Curtis v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 7 Cal.3d at pp. 951-952.)

Borg v. Transamerica Insurance

47 Cal. App. 4th 448 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1996

Co. v. Barbara B. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1076, 1081, 1084 [ 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 210 , 846 P.2d 792 ]; Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co. (1966) 65 Cal.2d 263, 276 [ 54 Cal.Rptr. 104 , 419 P.2d 168 ]; City of Laguna Beach v. … (Vann v. Travelers Companies (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1610, 1614-1615 [ 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 617 ]; CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co., supra, 176 Cal.App.3d at p. 605 ; Eichler Homes, Inc. v.