Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.08s
189 Cal. App. 4th 801 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 2010
The Ordinance is a local employment regulation governed by the MeyersMilias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov. Code, §§ 3500-3511; undesignated section references are to that code). (See Los Angeles County Civil Service Com. v. … (See Regents of University of California v.
Cited 6 timesPublished8 Cal. App. 5th 367 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2017
Exchange v. … (Aisenson v. American Broadcasting Co., supra, 220 Cal.App.3d at p. 161.) Here, the Internet posting referred only to Daniel’s physical resemblance to the Cleveland Brown cartoon character.
Cited 16 timesPublished46 Cal. App. 338 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1920
In Dunn v. … The other cases cited by the defendant to the same point are: Boone v. Templeman, 158 Cal. 290 , [ 139 Am. St. Rep. 126 , 110 Pac. 947 ]; Myers v. Williams, 173 Cal. 301 , [ 159 Pac. 982 ]; Pearson v. Brown, 27 Cal.
Cited 5 timesPublished235 Cal. App. 3d 872 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1991
(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 724 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 ].) Section 1029, subdivision (a) simply bars from employment as a peace officer any person “convicted of a felony.” … In Meyer v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 34 Cal.2d 62 , the Board of Medical Examiners had suspended the license of a physician for unprofessional conduct because of a felony conviction later expunged.
Cited 29 timesPublished65 Cal. App. 2d 425 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 1944
Brown and Dee Thomas.” That there must be an intention evidenced by the instrument to establish the relationship of the landlord and tenant, is likewise well established. (Beckett v. … (Bailey v. Brown, 4 Cal.App. 515 [ 88 P. 518 ] ; Elmore v. Elmore, 114 Cal. 516 [ 46 P. 458 ] ; 9 Cal.Jur. 561; 21 Cal.Jur. 267.)
Cited 28 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 2021
(Santos v. Brown (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 398, 410.) … (Coleman v. Schwarzenegger (E.D. Cal. & N.D. Cal. 2009) 922 F.Supp.2d 882, affd. sub nom. Brown v. Plata (2011) 563 U.S. 493.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedMarken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
202 Cal. App. 4th 1250 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2012
(Filarsky, at p. 431, citing Chrysler Corp. v. Brown (1979) 441 U.S. 281, 290-294 [ 60 L.Ed.2d 208 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 ].) … . § 702 ; see Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra, 441 U.S. at p. 317 ; Campaign for Family Farms v.
Cited 45 timesPublished76 Cal. App. 3d 534 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1977
Morris v. … (People v. Barger, supra, 40 Cal.App.3d 662, 668 ; People v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedRau v. Sacramento County Ret. Bd.
247 Cal. App. 2d 234 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1966
(Rogers v. Retirement Board, 109 Cal.App.2d 751 [ 241 P.2d 611 ] ; Robinson v. Board of Retirement, 140 Cal.App.2d 115 [ 294 P.2d 724 ].) One of the later decisions on this subject is Flaherty v. … Flaherty has been followed more recently in Le Strange v.
Cited 10 timesPublished237 Cal. App. 2d 773 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1965
(People v. Brown, supra, 49 Cal.2d 577, 591 ; People v. Manago, supra, 230 Cal.App.2d 645, 647 ; People v. Stoltz, 196 Cal.App.2d 258, 264 [ 16 Cal.Rptr. 285 ].) … Greer, supra, 30 Cal.2d 589, 601, 603 ), the condemned purpose of the act (People v. Brown, supra, 49 Cal.2d 577, 590 ; People v.
Disapproved in part by In re Hayes, 70 Cal. 2d 604 (1969)Cited 13 timesPublished270 Cal. App. 2d 408 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1969
Brown’s request, defendant took pictures of the baby and gave the film and camera to Mrs. Brown. Mrs. Brown did not notice blood or scratches on defendant’s face, but she did not look closely. Mrs. … Defendant cites the ease of People v.
Cited 11 timesPublished56 Cal. App. 771 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1922
As to the ownership of the property by Brown, it is true that the finding might have been more direct. … (Jennings v. Jordan, 31 Cal. App. 335 [ 160 Pac. 576 ].) Appellant cites Connor v. Riggins, 21 Cal.
Cited 4 timesPublished204 Cal. App. 4th 904 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 2012
The problem in conducting judicial review of the parole authority’s term-fixing practices was discussed in two subsequent cases: People v. … After the reduction in the size of the nonindeterminately sentenced prison population necessary to comply with the directive of the Supreme Court in Brown v.
Cited 26 timesPublished130 Cal. App. 3d 721 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1982
(Wood v. … In People v.
Cited 4 timesPublished135 Cal. App. 3d 710 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 1982
V. Fine Reduced Without Requiring DUI School. … (People v. Johnson, supra, 26 Cal.3d 557 .) 3. Martin was entitled to a postindictment preliminary hearing. In Hawkins v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCalifornia Court of Appeal · May 30, 2019
Hickman (1967) 66 Cal.2d 841, 849, fn. 6, quoting Silver v. Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845; see also Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. v. … (b) [providing the same definition for “emergency medical care” and “emergency medical services”]; see also Zavala v. Board of Trustees (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 1755, 1762.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedFletcher v. San Jose Mercury News
216 Cal. App. 3d 172 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1989
Brown (1980) 447 U.S. 455, 467 [ 65 L.Ed.2d 263, 273 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 ].) This is because speech concerning public affairs is not just self-expression; it is the essence of self-government. (Garrison v. … (Jenoff v. Hearst Corp.
Cited 26 timesPublished17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 368 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 2004
Wilcox, M.D., Ph.D., who stated he was board certified both in pediatrics and in medical genetics. … Brown, J., did not participate therein.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCalnev Pipe Line Co. v. City of Colton
230 Cal. App. 2d 184 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1964
Peck v. … Board of Supervisors, 32 Cal.App. 495, 504 [ 163 P. 341 ] [storm water districts] ; Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 119 Cal.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBay General Community Hospital v. County of San Diego
156 Cal. App. 3d 944 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 1984
In Mooney v. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for hearing by the Supreme Court was denied August 9, 1984.
Disapproved in part by County of San Diego v. State, 15 Cal. 4th 68 (1997)Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna