Case law

Doe v. Google, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 2020

Union v. … Linn v.

Rio Vista Farm Bureau Center v. County of Solano

5 Cal. App. 4th 351 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1992

Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15151 ; 7 Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 862 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 575 ].) … (McQueen v Board of Directors, supra, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 1146 .)

Taylor v. Ryan

210 Cal. App. 3d 706 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1989

(See, e.g., Serrano v. … (See also Brown v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 189, 189-192 [ 173 Cal.Rptr. 803 ] to the same effect.

A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.

238 Cal. App. 2d 736 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1965

(Dillon v. Board of Pension Comrs., 18 Cal.2d 427, 431 [ 116 P.2d 37 , 136 A.L.R. 800 ].) … (Silva v. Mercier, supra, 33 Cal.2d at p. 708.) The general rule is that an extrajudicial determination made final and conclusive by the contract will be overthrown only for fraud, bad faith or mistake. (Brown v.

Economy Refining & Service Co. v. Royal National Bank of New York

20 Cal. App. 3d 434 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1971

(Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Company, 180 Cal. 348 [ 181 P. 780 ]; Atkinson v. Western Development Syndicate, 170 Cal. 503 [ 150 P. 360 ]; Talbot v. … (Priest v. Brown, 100 Cal. 626 [ 35 P. 323 ].)

Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.

228 Cal. App. 2d 139 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1964

Proc. § 1875, subd. 3; Dittus v. Cranston (1959) 53 Cal.2d 284, 286 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 327 , 347 P.2d 671 ] (records of State Board of Control); Pearson v. … State Social Welfare Board (1960) 54 Cal.2d 184, 210 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 353 P.2d 33 ] (records of Department of Social Welfare and Board of Social Welfare); Department of Mental Hygiene v.

People v. Sullivan

80 Cal. App. 3d 16 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1978

In People v. … Moreover, People v.

People v. Hobson

255 Cal. App. 2d 557 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1967

(See People v. Aday, 226 Cal.App.2d 520, 533, 534 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 199 ].) Conspiracy is appropriately defined in People v. … (People v. Buckman, supra, 186 Cal.App.2d 38 ; People v. Frankfort, 114 Cal.App.2d 680 , 688 - 689 [ 251 P.2d 401 ]; People v. Sica, 112 Cal.App.2d 574, 583 [ 247 P.2d 72 ]; People v.

Mission Valley East, Inc. v. County of Kern

120 Cal. App. 3d 89 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1981

Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Hanson (P. !>.), J., concurred. … (Chesney v.

Michael Leslie Productions v. Bd. of Recreation and Park Commissioners CA2/3

California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2015

Filed 3/20/15 Michael Leslie Productions v. … In March 2009, when Morales transmitted the Concession Agreement to the Board, he explained that City Attorney Brown had reviewed it.

Ross v. Southern California Junior College

15 Cal. App. 2d 541 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 18, 1936

(Rosenthal v. Silveira, 42 Cal. App. 637 [ 184 Pac. 58 ]; Little v. Kennedy, 86 Cal. App. 324 [ 260 Pac. 890 ] ; Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co., 123 Cal. 1 [ 55 Pac. 713 , 69 Am. St. Rep. 17 , 43 L. R. … A. 199] ; Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co., 156 Cal. 776 [ 106 Pac. 55 ]; Cross v. Mayo, 167 Cal. 594 [ 140 Pac. 283 ].) Judgment affirmed. Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

People v. Quintana

69 Cal. App. 3d 178 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1977

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. After his 1972 conviction of second degree burglary, appellant was found eligible for and was committed to the California Rehabilitation Center (hereinafter C.R.C.) for treatment. … (See People v. Wisdom, supra, 47 Cal.App.3d 482 ; People v. Hillock, supra, 39 Cal.App.3d 36 ; People v.

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization

53 Cal. App. 4th 289 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1997

It follows, in our view, that the general rules of construction governing tax exemptions—exemptions are to be construed liberally in favor of the Board and strictly against the taxpayer (Beatrice Co. v. … Any other conclusion would eviscerate the intent of section 6396. 7 To avoid this result, the Board relies on two cases, Engs Motor Truck Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, supra, 189 Cal.App.3d 1458 , and Pope v.

People ex rel. Department of Public Works v. Becker

262 Cal. App. 2d 634 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1968

Public Works v. Giumarra Vineyards Corp., 245 Cal.App.2d 309 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 902 ]. Of those cases Bacich v. Board of Control, supra, Breidert v. Southern Pac. Co., supra, and Valenta v. … (Bacich v. Board of Control, supra, 23 Cal.2d 343 .) The rule that the creation of such a cul-de-sac is a substantial impairment of the right of access applies with regard to non-urban property. (Valenta v.

People v. Hinojosa

103 Cal. App. 3d 57 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1980

Board of Retirement (1949) 92 Cal.App.2d 188, 193 [ 206 P.2d 903 ]; Thurston v. County of Los Angeles (1953) 117 Cal.App.2d 618, 621 [ 256 P.2d 588 ]; Wilson v. … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Hopper, J., concurred.

People v. Castille

29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 71 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2005

(People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 537 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 73 P.3d 1137 ].) … (See United States v. Lares-Valdez (9th Cir. 1991) 939 F.2d 688, 689 ; United States v. Davis (6th Cir. 1972) 459 F.2d 167, 168-169 ; U.S. v. Alba (D.Conn. 1990) 732 F.Supp. 306, 309-310 ; Gandía v.

Casenas v. Fujisawa USA, Inc.

58 Cal. App. 4th 101 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1997

(Monastra v. … Brown was her district sales manager at the relevant times: Criticism of work practices is “ ‘a normal part of the employment relationship.’ ” (Soules v.

Kent v. Lake Don Pedro Com. Services Dist. CA5

California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2015

(Bartoli v. City of Sebastopol (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 353, 368.) An award of attorneys’ fees under the Brown Act is reviewed for abuse of discretion (Boyle v. … In Moreno v.

Clausing v. San Francisco Unified School District

221 Cal. App. 3d 1224 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1990

(Brown v. Regents of University of California (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 982, 988 [ 198 Cal.Rptr. 916 ].) … (Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co. (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1103, 1123 [ 245 Cal.Rptr. 658 , 751 P.2d 923 ]; Brown v. Regents of University of California, supra, 151 Cal.App.3d at pp. 988-991.)

In Re Marriage of Fell

55 Cal. App. 4th 1058 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1997

Governing Board (1977) 76 Cal.App.3d 314, 322 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 812 ]; Mary R. v. B. & R. Corp. (1983) 149 Cal.App.3d 308, 316-317 [ 196 Cal.Rptr. 871 ].) … Co. v. Brown, supra, 63 Cal.2d at pp. 510-511; California Cas. Indem. Exch. v. Steven, supra, 5 Cal.App.3d at pp. 306-307.)