Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.61s

  • City of Industry v. City of Fillmore

    198 Cal. App. 4th 191 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 2011

    Brown therefore concluded that the stop notices did not involve an “official proceeding” and that clause (1) of section 425.16, subdivision (e) was inapplicable. (A.F. Brown, supra, at p. 1129 .) … (City of Fillmore v. Board of Equalization (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 716, 732-734 [ 125 Cal.Rptr.3d 186 ].)

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Markley v. City Council

    131 Cal. App. 3d 656 · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1982

    (Whitman v. Board of Supervisors (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 397, 405 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 866 ]; Mountain Defense League v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 65 Cal.App. 3d 723, 728 .) … In considering this omission, the court, quoting from Brown v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • DiPirro v. BONDO CORPORATION

    62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 722 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 12, 2007

    Brown further expressed dissatisfaction with some aspects of Dr. … (California State Employees’ Assn. v. Board of Administration (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 137, 142 [ 5 Cal.Rptr.3d 922 ].)

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Borders v. Anderson

    204 Cal. App. 2d 401 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1962

    (See Black v. State Personnel Board, 136 Cal.App.2d 904, 912 [ 289 P.2d 863 ]; Fuller v. Board of Medical Examiners, 14 Cal.App.2d 734, 736 [ 59 P.2d 171 ].) … (See Black v. State Personnel Board, 136 Cal.App.2d 904, 912 [ 289 P.2d 863 ]; Fuller v. Board of Medical Examiners, 14 Cal.App.2d 734, 736 [ 59 P.2d 171 ].)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jahangiri v. Medical Bd. of California

    40 Cal. App. 4th 1657 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1995

    (See, Eichman v. Escondido Union High School District (1964) 61 Cal.2d 100, 101 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 199 , 389 P.2d 727 ]; Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 304 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) … (Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Ins.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Superior Court

    3 Cal. App. 4th 661 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1992

    (Board of Trustees v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 516, 525 [ 174 Cal.Rptr. 160 ]; City of Santa Barbara v. Adamson (1980) 27 Cal.3d 123, 131 [ 164 Cal.Rptr. 539 , 610 P.2d 436 , 12 A.L.R.4th 219 ].) … (Britt v. Superior Court, supra, 20 Cal.3d at pp. 859-862; Weil & Brown, Civil Procedure Before Trial (1991) Scope of Discovery, § 8:320, p. 8C-51.1.) Here, Ms.

    Disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., 220 Cal. Rptr. 3d 472 (2017)Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Schuster v. Municipal Court

    109 Cal. App. 3d 887 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1980

    Contribution disclosure cases such as Buckley v. Valeo, supra, Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 5 Cal.3d 509 , and Socialist Workers etc. Committee v. … Brown (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 879 [ 125 Cal.Rptr. 915 ], as well as decisions upholding the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act (United States v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Citizens for Responsible Behavior v. Superior Court

    1 Cal. App. 4th 1013 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1991

    (Brown v. City of Berkeley (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 231 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 1 ].) While a city charter may be amended by a majority vote of the electorate (Cal. Const., art. … (See Brown v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Clayton v. City of Sunnyvale

    62 Cal. App. 3d 666 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1976

    O’Hagan v. Board of Zoning Adjustment (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 722, 726 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 501 ].) Elson v. Public Utilities Commission, supra, 51 Cal.App.3d at pages 585-589, suggests otherwise. … J., and Brown (H. C), J., concurred.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • People v. Watson

    89 Cal. App. 3d 376 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1979

    In People v. … (See People v. Browning (1975) 45 Cal.App.3d 125 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 420 ].)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Estrada v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

    58 Cal. App. 4th 1458 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1997

    The Board’s Decision in Thomas v. Sports Chalet, Inc. … (Thomas v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Terhune v. Superior Court

    80 Cal. App. 4th 409 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2000

    (People v. Summers (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 180, 184-185 [ 195 Cal.Rptr. 21 ]; People v. Matta (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 472, 480-481 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 205 ]; People v. … (See Dunn v. U.S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lower Yucaipa Water Co. v. Hill

    157 Cal. App. 2d 306 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1958

    (Caballero v. Balamotis, 144 Cal.App.2d 58 [ 300 P.2d 363 ] ; Winchell v. Lambert, 146 Cal.App.2d 575 [ 304 P.2d 149 ]; Frericks v. Sorensen, 113 Cal.App.2d 759 [ 248 P.2d 949 ] ; Price v. … (Mello v. Weaver, 36 Cal.2d 456 [ 224 P.2d 691 ].)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Castille

    29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 71 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2005

    (People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 537 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 73 P.3d 1137 ].) … (See United States v. Lares-Valdez (9th Cir. 1991) 939 F.2d 688, 689 ; United States v. Davis (6th Cir. 1972) 459 F.2d 167, 168-169 ; U.S. v. Alba (D.Conn. 1990) 732 F.Supp. 306, 309-310 ; Gandía v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Verceles v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. CA2/8

    California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 2021

    (Centinela Freeman Emergency Medical Associates v. Health Net of California, Inc. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 994, 1010.) Our interpretation of the Brown Act is independent. (See 4 Furtado v. … So too did the board in Verceles’s case. Bell, supra, 82 Cal.App.4th 672 and Moreno v. City of King (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 17, which found Brown Act violations, are distinguishable.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sanchez v. Municipal Court

    97 Cal. App. 3d 806 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1979

    (People v. Jacobs, 27 Cal.App.3d 246 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 536 ]; People v. Davis, 265 Cal.App.2d 341 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 242 ]; Cody v. Justice Court, 238 Cal.App.2d 275 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 716 ].) … In People v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Google, Inc.

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 2020

    Union v. … Linn v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Truly Nolen of America v. Superior Court

    208 Cal. App. 4th 487 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 2012

    The court found that Gentry remains controlling California law under the stare decisis doctrine, relying on Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 489 [ 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 854 ] (Brown). … (See Kinecta, supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 516 ; Brown, supra, 197 Cal.App.4th at p. 498 ; Plows v. Rockwell Collins, Inc. (C.D.Cal. 2011) 812 F.Supp.2d 1063, 1069 .)

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • People v. Bryant

    157 Cal. App. 2d 528 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1958

    The direct testimony of Officer Brown that he purchased the narcotic from appellant is sufficient to sustain a conviction upon the charge contained in the indictment herein (People v. … As was said in People v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Webb v. Miller

    187 Cal. App. 3d 619 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1986

    (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308-309 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) The appellate court will only reverse the judgment of the superior court if it is based on an erroneous conclusion of law. (Magit v. … (Shoban v. Board of Trustees (1969) 276 Cal.App.2d 534, 546 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 112 ].)” Alba v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (1983) 140 Cal.App.3d 997, 1005 [ 189 Cal.Rptr. 897 ].) 2.

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.