Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.29s
Thierfeldt v. Marin Hospital District
35 Cal. App. 3d 186 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1973
(Viles v. State of California (1967) 66 Cal.2d 24, 29-33 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 666 , 423 P.2d 818 ]; Flores v. Board of Supervisors (1970) 13 Cal.App.3d 480, 483-485 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 717 ]; Segal v. … Code, § 3532), a newly perfected cause of action (see Brown v. Huntington Beach etc. Sch. Dist. (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 640, 643-647 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 417 ]; and Savage v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedLos Angeles Bond & Securities Co. v. Superior Court
1 Cal. App. 2d 634 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1934
(Garvin v. Chambers, 195 Cal. 212 [232 Pac. 696]; Roberts v. Police Court, supra.) … (Roberts v. Police Court, supra.) The fact in issue in both the small claims court and the superior court was whether petitioner owed money to Mrs. Brown.
Cited 4 timesPublished115 Cal. App. 3d 744 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1981
During this time, Thomas Brown saw Bradley standing in front of his house. Bradley asked Brown if he had a car and when Brown replied he did not, Bradley went to the side of nearby apartments and bent down near a hole. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred.
Cited 21 timesPublishedState of California v. Superior Court
8 Cal. App. 4th 954 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 1992
(MacDonald v. … (See Keech v. Berkeley Unified School Dist., supra, 162 Cal.App.3d at p. 471 .) In view of the lack of any indication the Legislature intended to make petitioners liable in damages for Brown’s conduct (MacDonald v.
Disapproved in part by Haggis v. City of Los Angeles, 93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 327 (2000)Cited 7 timesPublishedSan Francisco Unified Sch. Dist. v. STATE OF CALIF
131 Cal. App. 3d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1982
(Lee v. Brown (1976) 18 Cal.3d 110, 114 [ 132 Cal.Rptr. 649 , 553 P.2d 1121 ].) … (Kruelle v. New Castle County Sch. Dist., supra, 642 F.2d 687, 695-696 ; Cox v. Brown (D.D.C. 1980) 498 F.Supp. 823, 827 ; North v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedHeath v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.
254 Cal. App. 2d 235 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 1967
Coast Steel Corp. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 106 Cal.App.2d 373, 377 [ 235 P.2d 125 ] ; Alford v. Industrial Acc. Com., 28 Cal.2d 198, 206 [169 P.2d 641] ; Cowell v. Industrial Acc. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 95 Cal.App.2d 443, 449-450 [ 213 P.2d 11 ].)
Cited 9 timesPublishedAlternatives for California Women, Inc. v. County of Contra Costa
145 Cal. App. 3d 436 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1983
(See Callie v. Board of Supervisors (1969) 1 Cal.App.3d 13, 18 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 440 ]; Jordan v. County of Los Angeles (1968) 267 Cal.App.2d 794, 799 [ 73 Cal.Rptr. 516 ]; Smokler v. … Brown (1980) 447 U.S. 455, 460-463 [ 65 L.Ed.2d 263, 269-271 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 ]; Police Department of Chicago v.
Cited 25 timesPublished42 Cal. App. 2d 551 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1941
The authorities cited by appellant in support of his claim of a variance (Brown v. Northern Cal. P. Co., 14 Cal. App. 651 [ 114 Pac. 54, 74 ] ; McKeon v. Lissner, 193 Cal. 297 [ 223 Pac. 965 ]. … Marin Mutual Water Dist. v. Peninsula Pav. Co., 34 Cal. App. (2d) 647 [ 94 Pac. (2d) 404 ]) do not apply. In neither the Brown case nor the Marin case was any negligence proved.
Cited 19 timesPublished133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 489 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 2003
Appellants cite People v. … In People v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedBuzgheia v. Leasco Sierra Grove
60 Cal. App. 4th 374 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1997
In Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. … As stated in Soule v.
Cited 25 timesPublished189 Cal. App. 4th 801 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 2010
The Ordinance is a local employment regulation governed by the MeyersMilias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov. Code, §§ 3500-3511; undesignated section references are to that code). (See Los Angeles County Civil Service Com. v. … (See Regents of University of California v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCarroll v. State Bar of California
166 Cal. App. 3d 1193 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 1985
(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal, (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; California Teachers Assn. v. … (See Residents Ad Hoc Stadium Com. v. Board of Trustees (1979) 89 Cal.App.3d 274, 292-293 [ 152 Cal.Rptr. 585 ].)
Cited 30 timesPublishedStoddard v. Western Employers Insurance
200 Cal. App. 3d 165 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 1988
As we stated in dicta in Dill v. Claims Admin. … (See, e.g., Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Ins.
Cited 5 timesPublished191 Cal. App. 2d 876 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1961
The codefendants were both identified by the victims, indeed Brown pleaded guilty and whether appellant aided and abetted Brown was a question of fact. (See People v. … It was for the jury to determine who was to be believed and Brown’s credibility was shattered considerably. The jury had the right to reject all of the testimony of Brown and appellant. (See People v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHighland Springs Conference & Training Center v. City of Banning
244 Cal. App. 4th 267 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 2016
(Miller, supra, 27 Cal.3d at p. 624; Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners (1969) 1 Cal.3d 351, 359 & fn 8.)4 4 Alexander relied on McIntire v. … court long ago repudiated (Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners, supra, 1 Cal.3d at pp. 359-360; Maguire v. Hibernia S. & L. Soc. (1944) 23 Cal.2d 719, 735-736 (Maquire).)
Cited 57 timesPublishedCrawford v. Huntington Beach Union High School District
98 Cal. App. 4th 1275 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002
But while we appreciate the unique value and importance of education (see, e.g., Brown v. … (Dayton Board of Education v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCarmel Valley Fire Protection v. State of Calif.
190 Cal. App. 3d 521 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 1987
(Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of Education (1963) 59 Cal.2d 382, 398 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 657 , 380 P.2d 97 ].) … (People v. Sims, supra, 32 Cal.3d at p. 487 .) Ross v.
Cited 38 timesPublishedCity of Big Bear Lake v. Cohen
California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 2017
The next day, Governor Brown signed the Dissolution Law, and it became effective immediately. (Id. at § 16.) … We also conclude, consistent with our decision in City of Bellflower v.
Cited 0 timesPublished102 Cal. App. 2d 442 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 21, 1951
A similar situation arose in Browning v. … Browning v. Browning was decided long after the Storke and McCaleb cases.
Cited 7 timesPublished106 Cal. App. 3d 294 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1980
The question was considered recently in Brown v. … court in Brown v.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna