Case law

Cellphone Termination Fee Cases

186 Cal. App. 4th 1380 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 2010

Settlement of Related Proceedings The settlement includes a release of the settlement classes’ ETF claims against Verizon, including the claims asserted in three other pending actions. *1386 The Brown Arbitration Brown v. … Two of the class representatives from Brown, Brown and Schroer, joined with the White plaintiffs to represent the nationwide settlement classes. 9 The Waudby Litigation Waudby v.

Aldea Dos Vientos v. CalAtlantic Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Feb 6, 2020

(Richey v. AutoNation, Inc. (2015) 60 Cal.4th 909, 916.) That is particularly true of the rights and policies governing the conduct of the arbitration itself. (Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. … Browne George Ross LLP (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 749, 765.) Section 7.01B contravenes explicit legislative expressions of public policy.

Scoggins v. Kristoff

96 Cal. App. 3d 771 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 7, 1979

Bank v. Goodman, 24 Cal.App.3d 131, 136 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 763 ].) … In the recent case of Brown v.

Smith v. City of Napa

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 908 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2004

(Tyra v. Board of Police etc. … (Hosford v. Board of Administration (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 854, 862 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 760 ]; Mansperger v.

Hart v. County of Los Angeles

151 Cal. App. 2d 271 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1957

Chester v. … (Standard Oil Co. v. J. P. Mills Organization, 3 Cal.2d 128, 132 [ 43 P.2d 797 ] ; Brown v. Copp, 105 Cal.App.2d 1, 6 [ 232 P.2d 868 ].)

Life v. County of Los Angeles

218 Cal. App. 3d 1287 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1990

(Charles S. v. Board of Education (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 83, 95 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 422 ]; In re Connie M. (1986) 176 Cal.App.3d 1225, 1240 [ 222 Cal.Rptr. 673 ].) … (Lee v. Brown (1976) 18 Cal.3d 110, 113 [ 132 Cal.Rptr. 649 , 553 P.2d 1121 ].) 8 c. Cross-appeal not moot.

Magnetic Arts Corp. v. Department of Industrial Relation

105 Cal. App. 3d 417 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1980

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … Mandamus is the proper procedure to compel the Department to rescind action which is beyond its authority (Aylward v. State Board etc. Examiners (1948) 31 Cal.2d 833, 839 [ 192 P.2d 929 ]).

Silver v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

79 Cal. App. 4th 338 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 2000

(Saathoff v. … It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that “ ‘ “every statute should be construed with reference to the whole system of law of which.it is a part so that all may be harmonized and have effect.” ’ ” (Brown v.

People v. Hatfield

273 Cal. App. 2d 745 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1969

In People v. … J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred. Appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied July 30, 1969.

People v. Pacini

120 Cal. App. 3d 877 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1981

(DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 179 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].) … (DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167 , 179 . . . .)” (People v. Medina, supra, 6 Cal.3d at p. 492.)

St. Francis Mem. Hosp. v. CA Dept. of Pub.Health

California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 2018

(Hansen v. … Brown, Deputy Attorney General Nimrod P. Elias, Deputy Attorney General Saint Francis Memorial Hospital v. California Department of Public Health A150545 11 12

Klinker v. Klinker

132 Cal. App. 2d 687 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1955

Harney, Inc. v. Contractors’ State License Board, 39 Cal.2d 561, 564 [ 247 P.2d 913 ].) … State v. Brown, 213 Ind. 118 [ 11 N.E.2d 679 , 113 A.L.R. 1243]." 1 California law makes incurable insanity a ground for divorce (Civ.

People v. Mayfield

225 Cal. App. 2d 263 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1964

Respondent’s position that appellants are properly convicted of murder in the second degree is predicated upon the cases of People v. Poindexter, 51 Cal.2d 142 [ 330 P.2d 763 ] and Ureta v. … People v. Hopkins, 101 Cal.App.2d 704, 706-707 [ 226 P.2d 74 ]; Penal Code section 31. Clearly, appellants did aid and abet. They chipped in to purchase the deadly contraband.

People v. Encerti

130 Cal. App. 3d 791 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1982

However, repeals by implication are not favored. ( Governing Board v. Mann, supra, 18 Cal.3d 819, 828 ; Flores v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 171, 176 [ 113 Cal. Rptr. 217 , 520 P.2d 1033 ].) … (See also People v. Brown (1960) 55 Cal.2d 64, 68-69 [ 9 Cal. Rptr. 816 , 357 P.2d 1072 ]; People v. Roeschlaub (1971) 21 Cal. App.3d 874, 878-879 [ 98 Cal. Rptr. 888 ]; People v. Reynolds, supra, 276 Cal.

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Llewellyn Iron Works

42 Cal. App. 766 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1919

Co. v. McDonald, 112 Ala. 216 , [ 20 South. 472 ]; Brown v. Louisville etc. R. Co., 111 Ala. 275 , [ 19 South. 1001 ]; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Plunkett, 25 Kan. 188 .) … Not even was the presence of the board in the hatchway investigated; nor was the board removed. [6] Notwithstanding the fact that other men than deceased were actually working in this very hatchway at the time, to defendant

Mullins v. Cal. Horse Racing Board CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 2014

Filed 3/18/14 Mullins v. Cal. … Perhaps this is so because Mullins argued to the trial court that state immunity statutes cannot immunize the Board against his federal claims. (See, e.g., Martinez v.

People v. Cheatham

50 Cal. App. 3d 592 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 1975

Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … Proc., § 1858; People v. Gilbert (1969) 1 Cal.3d 475, 480 [ 82 Cal. Rptr. 724 , 462 P.2d 580 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d at p. 645 .)

Gisler v. County of Madera

38 Cal. App. 3d 303 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1974

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. … (See also Hill v. City of Manhattan Beach, supra, 6 Cal. 3d 279, 285-286; Roney v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 138 Cal.App.2d 740, 742-743 ; 43 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 144 .)

Konou v. Wilson

211 Cal. App. 4th 1284 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 2012

(Perry v. Brown, at p. 1082, fn. 14.) … (Perry v. Brown, at pp. 1086-1095.)

People v. McLeod

210 Cal. App. 3d 585 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1989

Appellant relies primarily on our decision in People v. Brown (1986) 179 Cal.App.3d 207, 215-216 [ 224 Cal.Rptr. 476 ], and on People v. … . *590 (Nix v. Whiteside, supra, 475 U.S. at pp. 166-175 [89 L.Ed.2d at pp. 134-135]; cf. People v. Brown, supra, 179 Cal.App.3d at p. 216 ).