Case law

W. E. Hall Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd.

260 Cal. App. 2d 179 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1968

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 49 Cal.2d 729, 736 [ 321 P.2d 729 ].) No reported case has interpreted the statutes as applied to this fact situation. … Rev. v.

People v. BRAC

73 Cal. App. 2d 629 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1946

Tony went into the drug store and in a few minutes emerged with a small brown paper bag, which he handed to Raymond. The officers thereupon recovered the brown paper bag from *633 Raymond. … In People v.

People v. Roper

144 Cal. App. 3d 1033 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1983

City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. … (People v. Superior Court (Giron) (1974) 11 Cal.3d 793, 798 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 596 , 523 P.2d 636 ]; In re Brown (1973) 9 Cal.3d 679, 685 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 801 , 511 P.2d 1153 ].)

People v. Synanon Foundation, Inc.

88 Cal. App. 3d 304 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1979

As stated in People v. … Brown (G. A.), P. J., concurred.

Anderson v. Pittenger

197 Cal. App. 2d 188 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1961

In *194 Steen v. … In Buswell v.

Duskin v. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency

31 Cal. App. 3d 769 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1973

Board of Civil Service Commissioners, 1 Cal.3d 351 , 358-359 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 337 , 461 P.2d 617 ], wherein the court overruled Wolstenholme v. … As pointed out in Brown v.

Gisler v. County of Madera

38 Cal. App. 3d 303 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1974

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. … (See also Hill v. City of Manhattan Beach, supra, 6 Cal. 3d 279, 285-286; Roney v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 138 Cal.App.2d 740, 742-743 ; 43 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 144 .)

Torrey v. Industrial Accident Commission

132 Cal. App. 303 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1933

(Hufstetler v. Industrial Acc. Com., 103 Cal. App. 741 [ 290 Pac. 922 ].) The accident must be one resulting from a risk reasonably incident to the employment, to justify an award. (Coronado Beach Co. v. … A. 1916F, 1164]; Ward v. Industrial Acc. Com., 175 Cal. 42 [ 164 Pac. 1123 , L. R. A. 1918A, 233]; Balboa Amusement Producing Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 35 Cal. App. 793 [ 171 Pac. 108 ].)

People v. Cheatham

50 Cal. App. 3d 592 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 1975

Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … Proc., § 1858; People v. Gilbert (1969) 1 Cal.3d 475, 480 [ 82 Cal. Rptr. 724 , 462 P.2d 580 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d at p. 645 .)

B. C. Cotton, Inc. v. Voss

33 Cal. App. 4th 929 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1995

(See People v. Belous (1969) 71 Cal.2d 954, 972-973 [ 80 Cal.Rptr. 354 , 458 P.2d 194 ]; State Board v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners (1953) 40 Cal.2d 436, 448 [ 254 P.2d 29 ]; Allen v. … (See State Board v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, supra, 40 Cal.2d at p. 448; Allen v. California Board of Barber Examiners, supra, 25 Cal.App.3d at p. 1020 ; Bayside Timber Co. v.

Montgomery v. Superior Court

146 Cal. App. 2d 622 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 1956

Petitioner relies upon such cases as People v. Simon, 45 Cal.2d 645 [ 290 P.2d 531 ], and People v. … were Brown’s confederates.

Yesson v. S.F. Municipal Transportation Agency

California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 2014

(Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 695; see Lindelli, supra, 111 Cal.App.4th at p. 1109.) … “[A]dministrative agencies ‘ “may have executive, administrative, investigative, legislative or adjudicative powers.” ’ (Traub v. Board of Retirement (1983) 34 Cal.3d 793, 799, fn. 3, italics added.)” (Pettye v.

San Francisco Forty-Niners v. Nishioka

89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 388 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1999

(Comstock v. … (Patterson v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 202 Cal.App.3d at p. 30 .)

Federal Employees Dist. Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd.

260 Cal. App. 2d 937 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1968

In Bohn v. … In Webster v.

Epstein v. Superior Court

193 Cal. App. 4th 1405 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2011

Board of Civil Service Commissioners (1969) 1 Cal.3d 351 , 362 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 337 , 461 P.2d 617 ]; see 8 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Extraordinary Writs, § 202, p. 1106.) … (See National Assn, of Wine Bottlers v.

Valentin v. Valentin

93 Cal. App. 2d 588 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 1949

. § 31, p. 167; In re Yoder, 199 Cal. 699, 703 [ 251 P. 205 ]; Hilliker v. Board of Trustees, 91 Cal.App. 521, 526 [ 267 P. 367 ]; Johnson v. Sun Realty Co., 138 Cal.App. 296, 298 [ 32 P.2d 393 ].) … (McMahan v. Baringer, 49 Cal.App.2d 431, 432 [ 122 P.2d 63 ]; Bastajian v. Brown, 19 Cal.2d 209, 214 [ 120 P.2d 9 ].)

Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety v. Schwarzenegger

172 Cal. App. 4th 749 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 2009

Board of State Harbor Commissioners for San Francisco Harbor v. Dean (1953) 118 Cal.App.2d 628, 632 [ 258 P.2d 590 ].” … In Board of State Harbor Comrs. v.

People v. Markley

41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 257 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 2006

(See People v. Contreras (1981) 127 Cal.App.3d 248, 252-253 [ 176 Cal.Rptr. 589 ] [court properly directed indigent defendant to seek funds for transcript from public defender’s budget or board of supervisors].) … (People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 545 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 73 P.3d 1137 ].) Thus, any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. (Chapman v.

Shawn v. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District

60 Cal. App. 3d 699 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 1976

(Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors, 8 Cal.3d 247, 260-261 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].) The federal act clearly applies to rate-making (e.g., Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. … Brown (H. C.), J., arid Emerson, J., * concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied September 1, 1976, and respondents’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 29, 1976.

People v. Johnson

242 Cal. App. 2d 870 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1966

(People v. McFarland, 58 Cal.2d 748, 762-763 [ 26 Cal.Rptr. 473 , 376 P.2d 449 ].) … (See People v. Chessman, 38 Cal.2d 166 [ 238 P.2d 1001 ], where victim was moved approximately 22 feet; People v.