Case law

People v. Moe

116 Cal. App. 740 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 22, 1931

To establish the corpus delicti it is not essential to show that the crime charged was committed by the defendant" ( People v. Flores, 34 Cal.App. 393 [ 167 P. 413 ]; see, also, People v. … Britt, 62 Cal.App. 674 [ 217 P. 767 ]; People v. Rodway, 77 Cal.App. 738 [ 247 P. 532 ]).

Olsen v. J. J. Jacobs Motor Co.

99 Cal. App. 423 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1929

(Citing Reagh v. Cudahy Packing Co., 189 Cal. 335 [ 208 Pac. 121 ]; Smith v. Southern Pac. Co., 201 Cal. 57 [ 255 Pac. 500 ].) … However, we may refer to the following: Canty v. Pierce, 173 Cal. 205 [ 159 Pac. 582 ]; Sheldon v. Landwehr, 159 Cal. 778 [ 116 Pac. 44 ]; Harper v. Lamping, 33 Cal. 641 ; Watson v. Columbia Basin etc. Co., 22 Cal.

People v. Ollado

246 Cal. App. 2d 608 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1966

In People v. … People v.

Los Angeles Unified School District v. Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan

187 Cal. App. 4th 621 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 2010

Similarly, in White v. … In Kleitman v. Superior Court (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 324 [ 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 813 ] (Kleitman), the defendant argued that the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act; Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.)

Hudson v. Seeley Specialties Co.

19 Cal. App. 213 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1912

The facts as alleged in the complaint are so closely parallel to those involved in the case of Gay v. … (Brown v. Crown Gold M. Co., 150 Cal. 376 , [ 89 Pac. 86 ].), The judgment is affirmed. Allen, P. J., and Shaw, J., concurred.

Miller v. Superior Court Napa Cty.

71 Cal. App. 3d 145 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1977

Superior Court (1961) 55 Cal.2d 789 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. 415 , 362 P.2d 47 ], Crest Catering Co. v. Superior Court (1965) 62 Cal.2d 274 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 110 , 398 P.2d 150 ], and Sav-On Drugs, Inc. v. … Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 1 [ 123 Cal.Rptr. 283 , 538 P.2d 739 ] (Brown v.

Jamulians Against the Casino v. Wildlife Conservation Board CA3

California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 2016

(City of Huntington Beach v. Board of Administration (1992) 4 Cal.4th 462, 468.) In determining legislative intent, we look to the language itself first. (Mejia v. Reed (2003) 31 Cal.4th 657, 663.) … (See Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc. (2003) 30 Cal.4th 167, 211 (conc. & dis. opn. of Brown, J.)

Grier v. Kizer

219 Cal. App. 3d 422 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1990

(Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477, 484 [ 208 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 691 P.2d 272 ].) … (Armistead v. State Personnel Board, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 204 .)

People v. Palma

40 Cal. App. 4th 1559 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1995

Reid (1989) 490 U.S. 730, 740-741 [ 104 L.Ed.2d 811, 824-825 , 109 S.Ct. 2166 ]; Brown v. Luster (9th Cir. 1947) 165 F.2d 181, 184 .) … People v. Mixon (1982) 129 Cal.App.3d 118, 135-136 [ 180 Cal.Rptr. 772 ]; see People v.

Wright v. Lowe

140 Cal. App. 2d 891 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1956

Wright’s authorization to Brown was at most that of selling at the sum of $10,000. This would not authorize him to accept Dutch’s ofEer with its deduction provisions (Holbrook v. McCarthy, 61 Cal. 216 ; Stemler v. … Bass, 153 Cal. 791, 795 [ 96 P. 809 ]), nor did it make Brown solely her agent for bringing Dutch's new effort back to her. Agency generally is a question of fact. (Brokaw v.

Capp Care, Inc. v. Superior Court

195 Cal. App. 3d 504 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 13, 1987

(Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 37 Cal.3d 477, 488 .) … (Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 180-181 [ 203 Cal.Rptr. 626 , 681 P.2d 893 ].) Proffitt filed opposition to the proposed writ on September 23, 1987. 5 Proffitt points to Brown v.

Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. San Francisco Bay etc.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 2020

(Ramos v. … BROWN, J. WE CONCUR: POLLAK, P. J. STREETER, J. Santa Clara Valley Water District v.

In Re Marriage of Bergman

168 Cal. App. 3d 742 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1985

(Phillipson v. Board of Administration (1970) 3 Cal.3d 32, 46 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ], disapproved on other grounds in In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d at p. 851 fn. 14.) … E503-E504.) *763 V.

People v. Northern

256 Cal. App. 2d 28 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1967

In People v. … (People v. Jackson, 59 Cal.2d 468, 471 [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 329 , 381 P.2d 1 ] [dissent] ; People v. Brown, supra, pp. 67-68 ; People v. Shepard, 169 Cal.App.2d 283, 287-288 [ 337 P.2d 214 ].)

Centeno v. Roseville Community Hospital

107 Cal. App. 3d 62 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1979

Richard Brown and Ann H. Morris for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION WARREN, J. [*] Plaintiff, Ricardo S. … The various possibilities were discussed at several board meetings and members of the Board of Directors talked with a number of individuals in the fields of radiology and hospital administration." ( Blank v.

People v. Nunez

California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 2013

During the briefing stages of this case, the California Supreme Court decided People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314 (Brown). … Code, § 1170 et seq.) or by the Board of Prison Terms (Pen.

In re Campbell

11 Cal. App. 5th 742 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 2017

(Rogers v. … (People v. Williams (1997) 16 Cal.4th 153, 250; Ehrlich v. City of Culver City (1996) 12 Cal.4th 854, 865, fn. 4.)

Pennisi v. Department of Fish & Game

97 Cal. App. 3d 268 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1979

Younger v. Superior Court, supra, 16 Cal.3d 30, 40 ; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]). … Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 245 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 239 , 583 P.2d 1281 ]; see also State of South Dakota v. Brown (1978) 20 Cal.3d 765, 777 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 758 , 576 P.2d 473 ]; Reynolds v.

Western Continental Operating Co. v. Natural Gas Corp.

212 Cal. App. 3d 752 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1989

Deukmejian v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 150, 155 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 478 , 624 P.2d 1206 ]; Yorn v. Superior court, supra, 90 Cal.App.3d at p. 675 .) … Deukmejian v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 156 ; Trone v. Smith (9th Cir. 1980) 621 F.2d 994, 999 ; Yorn v. Superior Court, supra, 90 Cal.App.3d at p. 675 ; and Industrial Indem. Co. v. Great American Ins.

Big Sur Properties v. Mott

62 Cal. App. 3d 99 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1976

to the state. 2 *102 Helen Hooper Brown had donated the real property to the State of California in 1962. … (Spinks v. City of Los Angeles, 220 Cal. 366, 368 [ 31 P.2d 193 ]; City and County of S.F. v.