Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.44s

  • Trudgeon v. Fantasy Springs Casino

    84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 65 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1999

    In Long v. … tribal business council; a majority of the board had to be tribal members; and board members could be removed by a vote of the tribe. ( 555 N.W.2d 284, 295 ; see also White Mountain Apache Indian Tribe v.

    Abrogated by People Ex Rel. Owen v. Miami Nation Enters., 211 Cal. Rptr. 3d 837 (2016)Cited 27 timesPublished
  • People v. Elwell

    206 Cal. App. 3d 171 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 1988

    In People v. … In People v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Billings v. Rexford Park Apartments

    244 Cal. App. 2d 317 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 1966

    (Ira Garson Realty Co. v. Brown, 180 Cal.App. 2d 615, 623 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 734 ]; Lawrence Block Co. v. Palston, 123 Cal.App.2d 300, 306 [ 266 P.2d 856 ].) … (Lawrence Block Co. v. Palston, 123 Cal.App.2d 300, 306-307 [ 266 P.2d 856 ].) In Ira Garson Realty Co. v. Brown, 180 Cal.App.2d 615 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 734 ], the court said at page 625, after citing Lawrence Block Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Castello v. Central Eureka Mining Co.

    85 Cal. App. 2d 772 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1948

    Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co., 101 Cal.App. 263 [ 281 P. 646 ], relied on by appellants, is readily distinguishable. … (Sargent v. Shumaker, 193 Cal. 122, 129 [ 223 P. 464 ]; Engelbertson v. Loan & Bldg. Assn., 6 Cal.2d 477, 479 [58 P.2d 647]; Prudential Insurance Co. v. Sly, 7 Cal.2d 728, 731 [ 62 P.2d 740 ] ; 25 Cal.Jur. 90.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Oakland v. Hogan

    41 Cal. App. 2d 333 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1940

    (Newsom v. Board of Supervisors, 205 Cal. 262 [ 270 Pac. 676 ].) Respondents contend that the Board of Port Commissioners is not a legislative body of the City of Oakland; that it is primarily an administrative body. … (Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 Pac. 82 ].) The owner of abutting land may not build upon the highway without some form of governmental approval.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Pena v. Superior Court

    50 Cal. App. 3d 694 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1975

    Dist. v. … Brown (G. A.), P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Younger v. Solomon

    38 Cal. App. 3d 289 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1974

    (See Italian Star Line v. United States Shipping Board E. F. Corp. (2d Cir. 1931) 53 F.2d 359, 361 [ 80 A.L.R. 576 ].)” … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Rauber v. Herman

    229 Cal. App. 3d 942 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1991

    In Board of Supervisors v. … (Board of Supervisors v. Simpson, supra, 36 Cal.2d at p. 674 ; see 64 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 826 , 831 (1981).) For example, in People v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Fig Garden Park No. 2 Ass'n v. Local Agency Formation Commission

    162 Cal. App. 3d 336 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1984

    Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].)

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. Maxwell

    66 Cal. App. 2d 549 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1944

    The leading ease relied on b)r respondent is Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 8 [ 147 P. 1171 .] … In the first case of Brown v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • City of Malibu v. California Coastal Commission

    18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 40 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 2004

    For example, in Board of Education v. Superior Court (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 578 [ 155 Cal.Rptr. 839 ], the court held that local school boards could not put decisions of the State Board of Education to a referendum. … (Brown v. Boren (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1316 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 758 ].) 5 Amicus curiae for Californians for Local Coastal Planning takes a slightly different tack.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Estate of Mears

    90 Cal. App. 3d 885 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1979

    KENNETH CORY, as State Controller, Petitioner and Appellant, v. ALFRED L. BROWN, Objector and Respondent. Docket No. 43653. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two. … Brown, objector and respondent in this case, and to others, the corpora of two revocable trusts held in California.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Superior Court Napa Cty.

    71 Cal. App. 3d 145 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1977

    Superior Court (1961) 55 Cal.2d 789 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. 415 , 362 P.2d 47 ], Crest Catering Co. v. Superior Court (1965) 62 Cal.2d 274 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 110 , 398 P.2d 150 ], and Sav-On Drugs, Inc. v. … Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 1 [ 123 Cal.Rptr. 283 , 538 P.2d 739 ] (Brown v.

    Limited by Schnabel v. Superior Court, 5 Cal. 4th 704 (1993)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. CA1/4

    California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 2020

    decision in Brown v. … (See, e.g., Eureka Teacher’s Assn. v. Board of Education (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 469; Harris v. State Personnel Bd. (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 639, disapproved on another point in Coleman v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Dignity Health v. Mounts

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 2024

    The Medical Board withdrew the accusation in 2023. 4 order. … (Lundquist, at p. 1204, quoting Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 723.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Brady

    65 Cal. App. 345 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1924

    (Board of Commissioners v. Gwin, 136 Ind. 562 [22 L. R. A. 402, 36 N. E. 237 ].) … Browne, supra), in the county of Los Angeles. A strictly general law, according to the constitutional provision, must have a uniform operation.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In re S.S.

    California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 2023

    (People v. Ruiz (2018) 4 Cal.5th 1100, 1111, fn. 3.) … Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield (1989) 490 U.S. 30, 52.) The relevant rights belong to Indian tribes.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Security Pacific National Bank v. Matek

    175 Cal. App. 3d 1071 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1985

    Bank v. Wagner (1968) 265 Cal.App.2d 868, 874-875 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 832 ]; see also Brown v. Panish (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 429, 431-432 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 282 ]; Mason v. Unkeless (9th Cir. 1980) 618 F.2d 597, 599, fn. 3 .) … (Constans v. Ross (1951) 106 Cal.App.2d 381, 386 [ 235 P.2d 113 ]; see also Cochran v. Board of Supervisors (1978) 85 Cal.App.3d 75, 81 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 304 ].)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Carr

    170 Cal. App. 2d 181 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1959

    (People v. Willard, 150 Cal. 543 [ 89 P. 124 ] ; People v. Niino, 183 Cal. 126 [ 190 P. 626 ]). This he has failed to do. … The rule is thus stated in People v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Moyer v. Hook

    10 Cal. App. 3d 491 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1970

    BROWN (H. C.), J. … (See Schulstad v. City & County of San Francisco, 74 Cal.App.2d 105, 107 [ 168 P.2d 68 ], citing cases; also Rand v. Andreatta, 60 Cal.2d 846 [ 36 Cal.Rptr. 846 , 389 P.2d 382 ]; McGranahan v. Rio Vista etc.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.