Case law

People v. Dowdy

50 Cal. App. 3d 180 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1975

The cockatoo was being boarded by the pet shop for its owner, Dave Donaldson. … Brown (Gerald), P.

Grier v. Rita P.

12 Cal. App. 3d 1057 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1970

Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ault, J., concurred. 1 There had been a hearing in December 1969 when the referee read the report. … The order made thereafter was vacated and a new hearing ordered. 2 The juvenile court judge gave sympathetic consideration to the minor’s desire to be placed with relatives, rather than in a privately operated boarding school

County of Imperial v. Superior Court

61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 145 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 2007

In County of Imperial v. … In County of Imperial v.

People v. Ollado

246 Cal. App. 2d 608 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1966

In People v. … People v.

Billings v. Rexford Park Apartments

244 Cal. App. 2d 317 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 1966

(Ira Garson Realty Co. v. Brown, 180 Cal.App. 2d 615, 623 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 734 ]; Lawrence Block Co. v. Palston, 123 Cal.App.2d 300, 306 [ 266 P.2d 856 ].) … (Lawrence Block Co. v. Palston, 123 Cal.App.2d 300, 306-307 [ 266 P.2d 856 ].) In Ira Garson Realty Co. v. Brown, 180 Cal.App.2d 615 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 734 ], the court said at page 625, after citing Lawrence Block Co. v.

Castello v. Central Eureka Mining Co.

85 Cal. App. 2d 772 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1948

Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co., 101 Cal.App. 263 [ 281 P. 646 ], relied on by appellants, is readily distinguishable. … (Sargent v. Shumaker, 193 Cal. 122, 129 [ 223 P. 464 ]; Engelbertson v. Loan & Bldg. Assn., 6 Cal.2d 477, 479 [58 P.2d 647]; Prudential Insurance Co. v. Sly, 7 Cal.2d 728, 731 [ 62 P.2d 740 ] ; 25 Cal.Jur. 90.)

City of Oakland v. Hogan

41 Cal. App. 2d 333 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1940

(Newsom v. Board of Supervisors, 205 Cal. 262 [ 270 Pac. 676 ].) Respondents contend that the Board of Port Commissioners is not a legislative body of the City of Oakland; that it is primarily an administrative body. … (Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 Pac. 82 ].) The owner of abutting land may not build upon the highway without some form of governmental approval.

Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

60 Cal. App. 4th 1340 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1998

(Bryan v. … Likewise, a recent Appeals Board case, Rodriguez v. Sycuan Gaming Center, WCAB Case No. SDO 207197, involved the same issue before this court.

In Re Brady

65 Cal. App. 345 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1924

(Board of Commissioners v. Gwin, 136 Ind. 562 [22 L. R. A. 402, 36 N. E. 237 ].) … Browne, supra), in the county of Los Angeles. A strictly general law, according to the constitutional provision, must have a uniform operation.

Hart v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., Cty. of Orange

82 Cal. App. 3d 619 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1978

In its opinion and decision after reconsideration, the board, on the authority of Permanente Medical Group v. Workers’ Comp. … Since the board found on the basis of Dr.

In Re Marriage of Taylor

189 Cal. App. 3d 435 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 13, 1987

(Waite v. Waite, supra, 6 Cal. 3d 461 ; Bowman v. Bowman, supra, 171 Cal.App.3d at p. 152 .) … (See, e.g., Bowman v.

Sweetwater Fruit Co. v. City Council

126 Cal. App. 2d 655 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 1954

................ 80.00 33-1B-4 & 5 Anne Chincoll Kelly........ 90.00 33-1B-6 Sweetwater Fruit Co......... 620.00 33-1B-7 Harlan & Gladys Dwiere...... 1,270.00 33-1B-8 V. … There is no merit in this contention for, as was held in Rogers v.

Bernd v. Eu

100 Cal. App. 3d 511 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1979

(Bold v. *516 Board of Medical Examiners (1933) 133 Cal.App. 23, 25 [ 23 P.2d 826 ]; Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic, etc. (1937) 20 Cal.App.2d 76, 78 [ 66 P.2d 705 ]; see also Cartwright v. … Her reliance on Brown v. Title Ins. etc.

Common Cause v. Stirling

147 Cal. App. 3d 518 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1983

For example, in Aho v. … In Marini v.

People v. Statler

174 Cal. App. 3d 46 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1985

The trial court further noted that if People v. … (People v. Castro, supra, 38 Cal.3d at p. 319 ; People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 836 [ 299 P.2d 243 ].)

Maxwell v. Maxwell

66 Cal. App. 2d 549 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1944

The leading ease relied on b)r respondent is Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 8 [ 147 P. 1171 .] … In the first case of Brown v.

Trudgeon v. Fantasy Springs Casino

84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 65 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1999

In Long v. … tribal business council; a majority of the board had to be tribal members; and board members could be removed by a vote of the tribe. ( 555 N.W.2d 284, 295 ; see also White Mountain Apache Indian Tribe v.

Pacific States Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Coachella

13 Cal. App. 4th 1414 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1993

A. v. Continental Corp. … (Nichols v.

People v. Scott

224 Cal. App. 2d 146 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1964

The People, in addition to establishing the conspiracy between him and Brown, also established overt act number 3. Only one of the alleged overt acts need be established. (People v. … Brown, however, contends that because he was formerly convicted of the substantive offense involved in overt act number 1, his present conviction cannot be upheld. He bases his contention on People v.

Newman v. Fox West Coast Theatres

86 Cal. App. 2d 428 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1948

Raymond, 197 Cal. 126 [ 239 P. 1069 ]; Giannini v. Campodonico, 176 Cal. 548 [ 169 P. 80 ]; Means v. Southern California Ry. Co., 144 Cal. 473 [ 77 P. 1001 , 1 Ann.Cas. 206] ; Hall v. … That rule has been approved in a number of subsequent decision: Yamauchi v. O’Neill, 38 Cal.App.2d 703, 707 [ 102 P.2d 365 ] ; *432 Gay v. Cadwallader-Gibson Co., 34 Cal.App.2d 566, 570 [ 93 P.2d 1051 ] ; Smith v.