Case law

Kim v. State Personnel Board CA2/1

California Court of Appeal · Feb 2, 2021

Filed 2/2/21 Kim v. … v.

Scalf v. D. B. Log Homes, Inc.

27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 826 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 2005

In D’Amico v. … (See Hagen v.

Bauer v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

94 Cal. App. 3d 250 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1979

Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp. … We note that the Board based its award upon a theory different from the view we have taken. We believe the Board was in error in its reasoning. (See Ramsey v. Workmen’s Comp.

People v. Day

2 Cal. App. 4th 405 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 1992

(Com. v. Stonehouse (1989) 521 Pa. 41 [ 555 A.2d 772, 784, fn. 10 ].) … State v. Hodges (1986) 293 Kan. 63 [ 716 P.2d 563, 567 ], disapproved on other grounds in State v. Stewart (1988) 243 Kan. 639 [ 763 P.2d 572, 579 ].)

People v. Wattie

253 Cal. App. 2d 403 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1967

They covered him with boards, added the bedsprings and more boards over them and then "dumped the barrel of fire onto the pile of boards” and “he started burning up.” … A nine inch dark brown human head hair, approaching black, was found “draped over” both the interior and exterior side of his shoe.

Borba v. Thomas

70 Cal. App. 3d 144 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1977

For example, in Holder v. … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

Yribarne v. County of San Bernardino

218 Cal. App. 2d 369 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 17, 1963

.)” ■ Wilson v. Board of Supervisors, 154 Cal.App.2d 101, 110 [ 315 P.2d 748 ], expressly declared the constitutionality of the Municipal Utility District Act. The Wilson ease relied on People v. … J., and Brown (Gerald), J., concurred.

Raymond Plastering v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd.

252 Cal. App. 2d 748 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1967

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … The referee or appeals board may not leave undeveloped matters which its acquired specialized knowledge should identify as requiring further evidence. (West v. Industrial Acc.

Jane Doe No. 1 v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 2022

(Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 216 (Brown).) Thus, “as a general matter, there is no duty to act to protect others from the conduct of third parties.” (Delgado v. … (Brown, supra, 11 Cal.5th at p. 214, italics added, quoting Williams v. State of California (1983) 34 Cal.3d 18, 23.)

People v. Elwell

206 Cal. App. 3d 171 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 1988

In People v. … In People v.

People v. Dupree

156 Cal. App. 2d 60 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1957

In People v. … McCann v. Thompson, 144 F.2d 604, 605-606 , Goodman v.

Thompson v. Board of Administration for PERS CA1/1

California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 2025

Relying on the rule that a judgment by default is conclusive as to all issues tendered by the complaint (Brown v. … (See Brown v. Brown, supra, 170 Cal. at pp. 5, 6 [a defendant who defaults “is presumed to admit all the facts which are well pleaded in the complaint,” italics added]; Falahati v.

Twain Harte Associates, Ltd. v. County of Tuolumne

217 Cal. App. 3d 71 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1990

Bank v. Associated Motor Sales (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 171, 179 [ 165 Cal.Rptr. 38 ]; Weil & Brown, supra, § 10:133 rev. #1, 1989.) B. … (c); Weil & Brown, supra, § 10:136 rev. #1, 1989.)

California Ass'n of Retail Tobacconists v. State

135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 224 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 2003

(See Board of Directors v. Nye, supra, 8 Cal.App. at pp. 532-533; People v. San Joaquin etc. Assoc. (1907) 151 Cal. 797, 802-805 [ 91 P. 740 ].) … Code, §§ 53890-53891), the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 3501), the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code, § 82003), the Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54951), the Public Records Act (Gov.

Marino v. Valenti

118 Cal. App. 2d 830 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1953

(Stockwell v. Board of Trustees, 64 Cal.App.2d 197, 200-201 [ 148 P.2d 405 ], and cases there cited.) … (Stockwell v. Board of Trustees, supra, 64 Cal.App.2d 197, 203 .)

Grier v. Rita P.

12 Cal. App. 3d 1057 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1970

Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ault, J., concurred. 1 There had been a hearing in December 1969 when the referee read the report. … The order made thereafter was vacated and a new hearing ordered. 2 The juvenile court judge gave sympathetic consideration to the minor’s desire to be placed with relatives, rather than in a privately operated boarding school

City of Los Angeles v. Dawson

139 Cal. App. 480 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1934

and Eunice Eilene Brown, owners of said parcel of land, $4,000.00. … “Total compensation proper to be paid to the defendants, Henry West Brown and Eunice Eilene Brown, as the owners of said parcel of land, none.”

Pruett v. Dental Board of California CA3

California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2021

(c); Rand v. Board of Psychology (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 565, 574.) … (Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance, supra, 189 Cal.App.3d at p. 1052.)

Greenleaf v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

43 Cal. App. 691 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1919

It is alleged that the rear wall of the structure, which was of boards standing up and down, was ignited by the hot and burning coals. … The above quotation from Greenleaf on Evidence is cited and approved in Norwood v. Kenfield, 30 Cal. 394 . Commenting upon this precise point, the supreme court of Maine, in Brown v.

Bauer v. Bauer

46 Cal. App. 4th 1106 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1996

Superior Court (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 233, 241 [ 235 Cal.Rptr. 356 ]; Brown v. Newby (1940) 39 Cal.App.2d 615, 618 [ 103 P.2d 1018 ]; 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Appeal, § 275, p. 286.) … (Buss v. J.O.