Case law

Sarac v. State Bd. of Education

249 Cal. App. 2d 58 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1967

(Tringham v. State Board of Education, 50 Cal.2d 507, 508 [ 326 P.2d 850 ].) … (Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners, 57 Cal.2d 74, 87 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 488 , 366 P.2d 816 ].)

Hart v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., Cty. of Orange

82 Cal. App. 3d 619 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1978

In its opinion and decision after reconsideration, the board, on the authority of Permanente Medical Group v. Workers’ Comp. … Since the board found on the basis of Dr.

Sarten v. Pomatto

192 Cal. App. 2d 288 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1961

(Ernst v. Searle, 218 Cal. 233, 239 [ 22 P.2d 715 ] ; Hicks v. Wilson, 197 Cal. 269, 274 [ 240 P. 289 ]; Smeade v. Rosen, 121 Cal.App. 79, 84 [ 8 P.2d 507 ]; Coover v. Cox, 95 Cal.App. 1, 5 [ 272 P. 343 ] ; Schnier v. … In Darlington v.

Rojas v. Cal. State Personnel Board CA4/3

California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 2015

Filed 1/29/15 Rojas v. Cal. … (Cate v. State Personnel Bd. (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 270, 285; see Barber v.

San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Carlos R.

205 Cal. App. 4th 111 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 2012

{People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 530 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 ] {Brown); see People v. … (See Kelly, supra, 17 Cal.3d at p. 38; Brown , at p. 533; People v. Pizarro (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 57, 79-80 [ 12 Cal.Rptr.2d 436 ].)

Bynum v. Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors CA3

California Court of Appeal · May 1, 2023

Filed 5/1/23 Bynum v. … Arnaiz, Ltd. v.

Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton

210 Cal. App. 4th 1484 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 2012

(Wise v. … Brown v. Tehama County Bd. of Supervisors (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 422 [ 56 Cal.Rptr.3d 558 ], cited by plaintiffs, does not dictate a contrary result.

Ashford v. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District CA6

California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 2025

Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. … Brown Act (Brown Act) (§ 54950 et seq.) because a board member discussed Ashford’s proposal at a public meeting with off- agenda items. 4  B.

Sweetwater Fruit Co. v. City Council

126 Cal. App. 2d 655 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 1954

................ 80.00 33-1B-4 & 5 Anne Chincoll Kelly........ 90.00 33-1B-6 Sweetwater Fruit Co......... 620.00 33-1B-7 Harlan & Gladys Dwiere...... 1,270.00 33-1B-8 V. … There is no merit in this contention for, as was held in Rogers v.

Garner v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

202 Cal. App. 2d 720 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1962

SP 506032, which belonged to the defendant, carrying a piece of dunnage gypsum board weighing about 65 pounds, which board was to be used in preparing the car in part to receive a load of Kaiser’s gypsum boards. … (Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. (1928) 95 Cal.App. 781 [ 273 P. 630 ] ; Vitrano v. Westgate Sea Products Co. (1939) 34 Cal.App.2d 462 [ 93 P.2d 832 ]; Brown v.

MAGINN v. City of Glendale

85 Cal. Rptr. 2d 639 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1999

Rules of Court, rule 57 (review of Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board decisions) does not authorize the clerk to refuse to file a petition on such grounds]; Rojas v. … (Citations and italics omitted.)]; Weil & Brown, Cal.

Hall v. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co.

66 Cal. App. 615 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1924

that application has been made to such board of directors to provide rooms therein for the board of education. … Among these are, Protestant Foster Home of Newark v. Mayor, etc., 52 N. J. L. 138 [ 18 Atl. 572 ]; Brown v. City of Silverton, 97 Or. 441 [ 190 Pac. 971 ]; Conde v. Schenectady, 164 N. Y. 258 [ 58 N.

Vergara v. State

California Court of Appeal · May 3, 2016

(Serrano II, supra, 18 Cal.3d 728, 776; Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1127-1130.) … (See Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280, 297; Hardy, supra, 21 Cal.3d 1, 7-8.) 31 Legal Foundation v.

People v. National Association of Realtors

155 Cal. App. 3d 578 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1984

*581 Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. The People appeal a judgment entered after remand from an earlier appeal (People v. … The New Jersey court interpreted footnote 13 as saying Palsson required nonmembers access to a board’s MLS only when the limitation on access was found to exist in combination with other restrictions, such as the board not

City of Oakland v. Hogan

41 Cal. App. 2d 333 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1940

(Newsom v. Board of Supervisors, 205 Cal. 262 [ 270 Pac. 676 ].) Respondents contend that the Board of Port Commissioners is not a legislative body of the City of Oakland; that it is primarily an administrative body. … (Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 Pac. 82 ].) The owner of abutting land may not build upon the highway without some form of governmental approval.

Edwards v. Fresno Community Hospital

38 Cal. App. 3d 702 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1974

In Suckow, a doctor brought an action against a board of medical examiners after his license was suspended. … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

Schindler v. Young

13 Cal. App. 18 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1910

The court, no doubt, had in view the principle applied in Brown v. Jenks, 98 Cal. 10 , [ 32 Pac. 701 ], Blochman v. Spreckels, 135 Cal. 662 , [ 67 Pac. 1061 ], and like cases. … The specifications in Blochmcm v.

Department of Health Services of Los Angeles Cty. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n

17 Cal. App. 4th 487 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1993

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 724 ; Orange County Employees Assn. v. County of Orange, supra, 234 Cal.App.3d at p. 841 .) … (Ontario Community Foundations, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1984) 35 Cal.3d 811, 816 [ 201 Cal.Rptr. 165 , 678 P.2d 378 ]; Board of Supervisors v.

People v. Sheasbey

82 Cal. App. 459 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1927

(People v. Nelson, 56 Cal. 77 ; People v. Jones, 53 Cal. 59 .) … (People v. Ammerman, 118 Cal. 23 [ 50 Pac. 15 ]; People v. Vice, 21 Cal. 345 ; People v. Hale, 64 Cal. App. 523, 530 [ 222 Pac. 148 ].)

County of Orange v. Quinn

118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 833 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 2002

Brown (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322, 335 [ 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 862 P.2d 710 ] [noting “the maxim that a statute must be construed, if possible, to avoid constitutional issues”]; Association for Retarded Citizens v. … [noting duty of court “to construe statutes so as to avoid constitutional questions”]; Guardianship of Stephen G. (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 1418, 1425 [ 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 409 ] [quoting People v. Brown].)