Case law

Sav-On Drugs, Inc. v. County of Orange

190 Cal. App. 3d 1611 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1987

State Board of Optometry (1965) 235 Cal.App.2d 591, 607 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 512 ], italics added; see also Madrid v. … (Heckendorn v. City of San Marino (1986) 42 Cal.3d 481, 488 [ 229 Cal.Rptr. 324 , 723 P.2d 64 ].) We answered a similar contention in a like vein in Brown v.

Duran v. Cassidy

28 Cal. App. 3d 574 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1972

Brown, 221 Cal.App.2d 319, 325 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 474 ]; Hughes v. Lincoln, 232 Cal.App.2d 741 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 306 ].) … J., and Brown (G. A.), J., concurred.

Belth v. Garamendi

232 Cal. App. 3d 896 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 1991

Such, however, is not always the case in the use of the word ‘shall.’ ” (Governing Board v. Felt (1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 156,161 [ 127 Cal.Rptr. 381 ].) … (Governing Board v. Felt, supra, 55 Cal.App.3d at p. 163 , citation omitted.) There is no such indication in this case.

Department of Health Services of Los Angeles Cty. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n

17 Cal. App. 4th 487 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1993

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 724 ; Orange County Employees Assn. v. County of Orange, supra, 234 Cal.App.3d at p. 841 .) … (Ontario Community Foundations, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1984) 35 Cal.3d 811, 816 [ 201 Cal.Rptr. 165 , 678 P.2d 378 ]; Board of Supervisors v.

Salyer v. County of Los Angeles

42 Cal. App. 3d 866 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1974

(E.g., Walker v. State Personnel Board, 16 Cal.App.3d 550, 556 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 132 ].) We need not decide whether the analogy applies as a general rule. … (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308-309 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Rigsby v. Civil Service Com., supra, 39 Cal.App.3d 696, 701 .) 3 Petitioner did not testify.

Sarten v. Pomatto

192 Cal. App. 2d 288 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1961

(Ernst v. Searle, 218 Cal. 233, 239 [ 22 P.2d 715 ] ; Hicks v. Wilson, 197 Cal. 269, 274 [ 240 P. 289 ]; Smeade v. Rosen, 121 Cal.App. 79, 84 [ 8 P.2d 507 ]; Coover v. Cox, 95 Cal.App. 1, 5 [ 272 P. 343 ] ; Schnier v. … In Darlington v.

People v. Marquez

11 Cal. App. 5th 816 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2017

(People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 319 [ 142 Cal.Rptr.3d 824 , 278 P.3d 1182 ] {Brown).) Defendant concedes Proposition 57 is silent on the question of whether it applies retroactively to proceedings under the act. … In Kent v.

Bynum v. Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors CA3

California Court of Appeal · May 1, 2023

Filed 5/1/23 Bynum v. … Arnaiz, Ltd. v.

Love v. State Dept. of Education

California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 2018

(Brown v. Smith (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 1135 [rejecting claims Sen. … (Brown v.

Leake v. Wu

64 Cal. App. 3d 668 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1976

(Tammen v. County of San Diego, 66 Cal.2d 468, 478 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 249 , 426 P.2d 753 ]; Shaddox v. Melcher, 270 Cal.App.2d 598, 601 [ 76 Cal.Rptr. 80 ]; Black v. … (See Vesely v.

Borba v. Thomas

70 Cal. App. 3d 144 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1977

For example, in Holder v. … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

County of Kern v. Galatas

200 Cal. App. 2d 353 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 1962

In City of Los Angeles v. Agardy, 1 Cal.2d 76, 79 [ 33 P.2d 834 ]; City of Los Angeles v. Abbott, 217 Cal. 184, 197-198 [ 17 P.2d 993 ]; and City of Los Angeles v. … J., and Brown, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied April 11, 1962.

Hall v. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co.

66 Cal. App. 615 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1924

that application has been made to such board of directors to provide rooms therein for the board of education. … Among these are, Protestant Foster Home of Newark v. Mayor, etc., 52 N. J. L. 138 [ 18 Atl. 572 ]; Brown v. City of Silverton, 97 Or. 441 [ 190 Pac. 971 ]; Conde v. Schenectady, 164 N. Y. 258 [ 58 N.

Kersten v. Dental Board of Cal. CA3

California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 2021

Filed 4/20/21 Kersten v. Dental Board of Cal. … Fund. v.

In Re Van Houten

10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 406 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2004

In Biggs v. … (People v.

Maas v. Standard Oil Co.

220 Cal. App. 2d 913 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1963

(Hoppin v. Munsey, 185 Cal. 678, 684 [ 198 P. 398 ]; C. A. Hooper & Co. v. Freeman, Smith & Camp Co., 1 Cal.App.2d 122, 124 [ 36 P.2d 146 ].) Thus we look to the relevant circumstances of the case. … The following observation concerning timely notice, expressed by the court in Clovis Fruit Co. v.

City of Los Angeles v. Dawson

139 Cal. App. 480 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1934

and Eunice Eilene Brown, owners of said parcel of land, $4,000.00. … “Total compensation proper to be paid to the defendants, Henry West Brown and Eunice Eilene Brown, as the owners of said parcel of land, none.”

Liebman v. Richmond

103 Cal. App. 354 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1930

The defendants reply that the power to build and maintain a courthouse has been vested in the defendant board by the express provisions of the statutes and the building may not be abated as a nuisance. … (Whittaker v. County of Tuolumne, 96 Cal. 100 [ 30 Pac. 1016 ]; Mayrhofer v. Board of Education, 89 Cal. 110 [ 23 Am. St. Rep. 451 , 26 Pac. 646 ].) It may not be sued except it gives its consent. (23 Cal. Jur. 578.)

Martinac v. County of San Diego

255 Cal. App. 2d 175 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1967

*172 BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … Board of Supervisors, 8 Cal.2d 286 [ 65 P.2d 791 , 110 A.L.R. 700 ]) ; 3) San Diego is plaintiffs’ vessels’ permanent location.

People v. Sheasbey

82 Cal. App. 459 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1927

(People v. Nelson, 56 Cal. 77 ; People v. Jones, 53 Cal. 59 .) … (People v. Ammerman, 118 Cal. 23 [ 50 Pac. 15 ]; People v. Vice, 21 Cal. 345 ; People v. Hale, 64 Cal. App. 523, 530 [ 222 Pac. 148 ].)