Case law

Merkley v. Williams

3 Cal. App. 268 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1906

In Bledsoe v. … II, secs. 5, 6; Wilson v. Fisher, 140 Cal. 188 , [ 73 Pac. 850 ] ; Anderson v. Browning. 140 Cal. 222 , [ 73 Pac. 986 ].) For the reasons above stated, and other reasons given in the case of Tout v.

Brown v. Automobile Club of So. Cal. CA2/1

California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 2013

Filed 7/31/13 Brown v. Automobile Club of So. Cal. … Complaint On January 10, 2012, plaintiff, Peggy Brown, filed this action. The complaint alleged as follows.

Paramount Citrus Assn. v. Jacobsen

162 Cal. App. 2d 147 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1958

(Sacre v. Chalupnik (1922), 188 Cal. 386, 390 [ 205 P. 449 ]; Weaver v. Fickett (1927), 82 Cal.App. 116, 122 [ 255 P. 257 ].) … (McKelvey v. Wagy (1910), 157 Cal. 406, 409 [ 108 P. 268 ].)

California School Employees Ass'n v. Sunnyvale Elementary School District

36 Cal. App. 3d 46 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1973

In Cobb v. … J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred.

Phillips v. Cooper Laboratories, Inc.

215 Cal. App. 3d 1648 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1989

Co. v. Franchise Tax Board (1964) 228 Cal.App.2d 290, 302 [ 39 Cal.Rptr. 453 ].) The merged corporation ceases to exist, and the merging corporation alone survives. (Ibid.) … We see no grounds upon which liability could attach to Cooper based upon traditional principles of corporate successor liability. 3 We note that Brown v.

Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 2021

(See Brown v. … (See Brown v.

Adoption of Easley

240 Cal. App. 2d 821 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1966

Following the child’s birth he was placed with the father who in turn placed him with respondents under a boarding home arrangement. … (Miller v. Johnson, 2. 14 Cal.App.2d 123,125 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 251 ].) The order is affirmed. Brown (Gerald), P. J., concurred.

People v. Freeny

37 Cal. App. 3d 20 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1974

(See Horack v. Franchise Tax Board, 18 Cal.App.3d 363, 367 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].) … Those arguments were *32 resolved adversely to appellant’s position in Horack v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 18 Cal.App.3d 363 . Horack is controlling here.

Smith v. H. E. Anning Co.

156 Cal. App. 2d 842 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1958

Sonotherm is a fibreboard made of shredded wood and cement compressed into a board one-inch thick. … One witness testified that it was “light green—gray-green”; another, “gray-brown; it was quite a brown coloring.” The company manufacturing the product described it as having a “neutral gray finish.”

In re Monzo

33 Cal. App. 3d 144 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1973

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … . 761 , 486 P.2d 657 ], and Pope v.

Wright v. Co. of San Mateo

California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 2019

Nonetheless, the board relied on Grotenhuis v. … WE CONCUR: _________________________ STREETER, J. _________________________ BROWN, J.

People v. Hogan

11 Cal. App. 599 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1909

(Bostwick v. Mahoney, 73 Cal. 238 , [ 14 Pac. 832 ].)

Scientific Cages, Inc. v. Banks

81 Cal. App. 3d 885 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1978

(Davis Co. v. Superior Court, 1 Cal.App.3d 156, 158 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 453 ]; Rushing v. Powell, 61 Cal.App.3d 597, 604-605 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 110 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred.

City of Galt v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 2017

Dist. v. … (See, e.g., Sutter Basin Corp. v. Brown (1953) 40 Cal.2d 235, 241 [government cannot impair fulfillment of bond obligations under laws in existence at time of bond issuance].)

Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.

125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 804 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 2002

It claims this matter is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act and that the National Labor Relations Board has exclusive jurisdiction over this case, the Union has no standing to sue because its standing is limited … -V. * VI.

Kinner v. Governing Bd. Orange County School Dist. CA4/3

California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2015

(Rosenblit v. Superior Court (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1434, 1443.) Brown’s Alleged Bias Kinner contends Brown had a history of animus toward her. … Co. v.

Mote v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD., KIMSTOCK, INC.

56 Cal. App. 4th 902 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1997

The WCJ denied the entire petition for penalties, and the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB or the board) denied the petition for reconsideration. … The board also denied penalties on the ground that Mote’s testimony included hearsay. In light of the evidence, this finding was illogical, improbable, and inequitable. (Western Growers Ins. Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

National Assn. of Wine Bottlers v. Paul

268 Cal. App. 2d 741 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 1969

BROWN (H.C.), J. This is an appeal from an adjudication declaring certain marketing orders of the appellant, *743 Director of Agriculture, void and permanently enjoining appellant from enforcing any of those orders. … (Terry v. Civil Service Com., 108 Cal.App.2d 861 [ 240 P.2d 691 ] ; Board of Education v. Watson, 63 Cal.2d 829 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 481 , 409 P.2d 481 ]; County of Madera v.

California School Employees Ass'n v. Bonita Unified School District

163 Cal. App. 4th 387 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 2008

Validity of the CBA’s Arbitration Provisions The board relies on Board of Education v. … Proc., § 1286; Eternity Investments, Inc. v. Brown (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 739, 745, 746 [ 60 Cal.Rptr.3d 134 ].)

Charleville v. Metropolitan Trust Co. of California

136 Cal. App. 349 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1934

In Mairo v. … (Meyer v. Haas, 126 Cal. 562 [ 58 Pac. 1042 ]; St. Louis etc. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 73 Ark. 42 [3 Ann. Cas. 573, 83 S. W. 332 ]; Mullen v. Old Colony Ry. Co., 127 Mass. 86 [ 34 Am. Rep. 349 ].)