Case law

Winston Square Homeowner's Ass'n v. Centex West, Inc.

213 Cal. App. 3d 282 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1989

Similarly, William Catlin, who purchased his unit in 1977 and was on the board from 1978 to 1982, testified the board had received complaints about ponding problems. … (Brown v. Nolan (1979) 98 Cal.App.3d 445, 451 [ 159 Cal.Rptr. 469 ]; see also Stiles v. Estate of Ryan (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 1057, 1066 [ 219 Cal.Rptr. 647 ].)

California School Employees Ass'n v. Sunnyvale Elementary School District

36 Cal. App. 3d 46 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1973

In Cobb v. … J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred.

Griffiths v. Superior Court

117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 445 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2002

(Ke nneally v. Medical Board, supra, 27 Cal.App.4th at p. 499 .) … (Homestead Savings v. Darmiento (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 424, 435 [ 281 Cal.Rptr. 367 ]; County of San Diego v. Brown (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 297, 306 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 483 ].)

Prudential Insurance of America v. City & County of San Francisco

191 Cal. App. 3d 1142 · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1987

The Board, pursuant to this authorization, has enacted administrative rules governing both local boards of equalization and assessors. (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 18, rules 1-60; see Midstate Theatres, Inc. v. … (Silver v. Brown (1966) *1157 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ].) We can avoid this result by simply reading the statute in accordance with its plain meaning.

In re Butler

231 Cal. App. 4th 1521 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 2014

V, § 8), and “shall review materials provided by” the Board. (§ 3041.2, subd. (a).) … He cites no authority for this proposition but instead “incorporates into his argument” the findings of fact and evidence from Gilman v. Brown, an unpublished 2014 decision of the United States District Court.

Lippman v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 2018

(Baum Electric Co. v. … In Morgado v.

People v. Watters

246 Cal. App. 2d 154 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1966

(People v. Jones, 244 Cal.App.2d 378 [ 52 Cal.Rptr. 924 ]; People v. Webb, 243 Cal.App.2d 179,184-185 [ 52 Cal.Rptr. 85 ]; People v. Stafford, 240 Cal.App.2d 422, 426 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 598 ].) … (Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 , 734 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 882, 893 , 86 S.Ct. 1772, 1781]; People v. Jones, supra, 244 Cal.App.2d 378, 382 .) The judgment is affirmed. Brown, P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred.

People v. Aguilar

181 Cal. App. 4th 966 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 2010

The front door of the victim's apartment unit had been boarded up, so a maintenance employee removed the boarding so the victim could access the apartment. … A maintenance employee helped the victim access the apartment by removing some boarding.

Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.

32 Cal. App. 4th 555 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1995

He had daily or weekly supervision from Brown. … Swoap (1976) 17 Cal.3d 671, 681 [ 131 Cal.Rptr. 789 , 552 P.2d 749 ] [welfare benefits]; Austin v. Board of Retirement (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1528,1532-1534 [258 CaLRptr. 106] [disability retirement benefits]; Aguilar v.

Robison v. City of Manteca

78 Cal. App. 4th 452 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 2000

Fund v. … (Keithley v. Civil Service Board, supra, 11 Cal.App.3d at p. 447 .)

Smith v. H. E. Anning Co.

156 Cal. App. 2d 842 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1958

Sonotherm is a fibreboard made of shredded wood and cement compressed into a board one-inch thick. … One witness testified that it was “light green—gray-green”; another, “gray-brown; it was quite a brown coloring.” The company manufacturing the product described it as having a “neutral gray finish.”

People ex rel. Desert Hot Springs County Water District v. Coachella Valley County Water District

232 Cal. App. 2d 685 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1965

BROWN (R. M.), J. … Judicial powers conferred on the State Water Rights Board may not be borrowed by a county water district. In Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v.

Heywood v. Municipal Court

198 Cal. App. 3d 1438 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1988

Heywood cross-complained for payment of board and feed bills and for attorney’s fees under the contract. … (Wood v. Brown (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 232, 237 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 63 ]; Satterfield v.

Dumas v. L.A. County Bd. of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 2020

BC618191) v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gregory Keosian, Judge. Affirmed. … (See Perez v. Grajales (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 580, 591- 592 (Perez); Browne v. County of Tehama (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 704, 726 [failure to raise argument in opening brief constitutes forfeiture].)

Walker v. Dorn

240 Cal. App. 2d 118 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1966

(See Meyer v. State Board of Equalization, 42 Cal.2d 376, 384 [ 267 P.2d 257 ].) … J., and Brown (R.M.), J., concurred.

People v. Howard CA2/5

California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 2026

Filed 4/29/26 P. v. … Brown and defendant drove around in Brown’s PT Cruiser, stopping at various places. At some point, an argument broke out between defendant and Brown.

Phillips v. Cooper Laboratories, Inc.

215 Cal. App. 3d 1648 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1989

Co. v. Franchise Tax Board (1964) 228 Cal.App.2d 290, 302 [ 39 Cal.Rptr. 453 ].) The merged corporation ceases to exist, and the merging corporation alone survives. (Ibid.) … We see no grounds upon which liability could attach to Cooper based upon traditional principles of corporate successor liability. 3 We note that Brown v.

Swyak v. Cal. Horse Racing Board CA3

California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 2013

Filed 12/19/13 Swyak v. Cal. … (Oliver v. Board of Trustees (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 824, 832.)

Los Angeles Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers and Bartenders v. Stan's Drive-Ins, Inc.

136 Cal. App. 2d 916 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1955

This is a companion case to In the Matter of Arbitration between Los Angeles Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers and Bartenders, A. … On the authority of In the Matter of Arbitration between Los Angeles Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers and Bartenders, A. F. of L., and Stan’s Drive-Ins, Inc., No. 20746, the order is affirmed. Shinn, P.

In Re Miller

52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 2006

O’Connell (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 1062, 1066 [ 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 665 ], citations omitted, quoting People v. Brown (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 452, 454-455 [ 263 Cal.Rptr. 391 ].) … Pope v.