Case law

California Teachers Assn. v. Hayes

5 Cal. App. 4th 1513 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1992

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ], citing Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 180 .)

Japan Food Corp. v. County of Sacramento

58 Cal. App. 3d 891 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1976

“The necessity of recourse to the board is properly determined by the nature of the issues in dispute, and not by whether an assessment is attacked in part or in toto.” (Original italics. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. … (See Brown v. Maryland (1827) 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 419 [ 6 L.Ed. 678 ].)

RAMANATHAN v. Bank of America

66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2007

(See Wells Fargo Bank v. … Indeed, in Peatros v.

Daniels v. Tergeson

211 Cal. App. 3d 1204 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1989

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), J. * Respondent Norman A. Tergeson was a candidate for fourth district supervisor in the County of Tuolumne at the June 7, 1988, primary election. … Kenworthy v. Mast (1903) 141 Cal. 268, 271 [ 74 P. 841 ].) Section 25041 by its language is mandatory. It prescribes a specific qualification requirement for members of the board of supervisors.

Dabis v. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency

50 Cal. App. 3d 704 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1975

The agency did not board up the windows and secure its building in response to Dabis’ repeated requests, until after the third burglary. … (Id. at p. 275 [ 21 L.Ed.2d at p. 480 ].) 2 The acronym stands for the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. 3 More recently, the Thorpe rule has been reiterated in: Brown v.

Willingham v. San Diego Unified School District

154 Cal. App. 2d 11 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1957

(Dribin v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.2d 345, 351-352 [ 231 P.2d 809 , 24 A.L.R.2d 864 ].) … As is said in Sutter Basin Corp. v. Brown, 40 Cal.2d 235, 247 [ 253 P.2d 649 ], quoting from Watson v.

People v. Curry

97 Cal. App. 2d 537 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1950

In Stroud v. … Brown does, and I think thus far Mr. Brown has conducted himself properly. Proceed, Mr. Brown. Mb.

Gallant v. City of Carson

27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 318 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 2005

I have also learned that Sybil Brown, a community member of Carson, told other persons at a Boards and Commissions training on September 20, 2003, that she was told by Groomes that I was terminated because I was incompetent … In Slauson Partnership v.

Hardy v. Stumpf

37 Cal. App. 3d 958 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1974

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. … Rts. v.

County of San Bernardino v. La Mar

271 Cal. App. 2d 718 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1969

The Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County adopted a resolution approving the method of administering the state act and the county ordinance set forth in the letter of the area director. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred. 1 The action was commenced in 1965. The Mobilehome Parks Act then in force was repealed in 1967 and a new act adopted.

People v. Farlow

52 Cal. App. 3d 414 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1975

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. The People appeal a judgment of dismissal (Pen. … He relies upon Thomas v.

Los Angeles County Federation of Labor v. County of Los Angeles

160 Cal. App. 3d 905 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1984

A similar limitation was considered by the Supreme Court in International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. City of Gridley (1983) 34 Cal.3d 191 [ 193 Cal.Rptr. 518 , 666 P.2d 960 ]. … That case held that the “meet and confer” provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 3500 et seq.) preempted any limitation on meeting and conferring with a recognized employee union, strike or no strike.

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City & County of S.F.

California Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 2021

We adopt the reasoning of City and County of San Francisco v. … Howard Jarvis primarily relies on Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board (2018) 5 Cal.5th 898 (Boling).

In Re Marriage of Johnston

85 Cal. App. 3d 900 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1978

Board of Administration (1970) 3 Cal.3d 32 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ]; In re Marriage of Sommers (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 509, 515 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 220 ]; *906 In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d at p. 848 ; Verner … v.

People v. Albrexstondare

71 Cal. App. 339 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1925

In the case of People v. … Curry, 103 Cal. 548 [ 37 P. 503 ]; People v. Lang, 104 Cal. 368 [ 37 P. 1031 ]; People v. Anderson, 105 Cal. 35 [ 38 P. 513 ]; People v. Hertz, 105 Cal. 663 [ 39 P. 32 ]; People v.

Santiago County Water District v. County of Orange

118 Cal. App. 3d 818 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 1981

In Brown v. … (See Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 260-261 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].)

Winston Square Homeowner's Ass'n v. Centex West, Inc.

213 Cal. App. 3d 282 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1989

Similarly, William Catlin, who purchased his unit in 1977 and was on the board from 1978 to 1982, testified the board had received complaints about ponding problems. … (Brown v. Nolan (1979) 98 Cal.App.3d 445, 451 [ 159 Cal.Rptr. 469 ]; see also Stiles v. Estate of Ryan (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 1057, 1066 [ 219 Cal.Rptr. 647 ].)

Lewis v. Seventeenth District Agricultural Ass'n

165 Cal. App. 3d 823 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1985

March 18, 1985. *825 COUNSEL Shine & Browne, Shine, Brown & Diamond, P. Scott Browne and Raymond E. Shine for Defendant and Appellant. Robert Eli for Real Party in Interest and Appellant. Richard F. … (See International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union v. Board of Supervisors (1981) 116 Cal. App.3d 265, 274 [ 171 Cal. Rptr. 875 ].)

Kalashian v. County of Fresno

35 Cal. App. 3d 43 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1973

(Savelli v. Board of Medical Examiners, 229 Cal.App.2d 124, 131 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 171 ].) … (See Jenner v. City Council, 164 Cal.App.2d 490, 501 [ 331 P.2d 176 ].) The judgments are affirmed. Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Thompson, J., * concurred.

Griffiths v. Superior Court

117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 445 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 2002

(Ke nneally v. Medical Board, supra, 27 Cal.App.4th at p. 499 .) … (Homestead Savings v. Darmiento (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 424, 435 [ 281 Cal.Rptr. 367 ]; County of San Diego v. Brown (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 297, 306 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 483 ].)