Case law

California Chamber of Commerce v. Brown

196 Cal. App. 4th 233 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 2011

(See Henning v. … (See DiPirro v.

Gillis v. Dental Board

206 Cal. App. 4th 311 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 2012

(Village Trailer Park, Inc. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., at p. 1140; see Board of Dental Examiners v. Superior Court, at p. 1430; Green v. … .] with Medical Board v.

Jordan v. Retirement Board

35 Cal. App. 2d 653 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1939

Board of Pension Fund Commrs., 79 Cal. App. 171 [ 249 Pac. 46 ]; O’Dea v. … (Douglas v. Pension Board, etc., 75 Cal. App. 335 [ 242 Pac. 756 ].) Eligibility thereto is regulated by statute (Klench v.

Brown v. City of Inglewood

California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2023

The case on which Brown primarily relies in arguing to the contrary, Whitehall v. … (See Malais v.

Foster v. Pension Board

23 Cal. App. 2d 550 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1937

A pension fund was thereby created together with a pension board to administer the same. … In either event, the respondent board was entitled to recover the amount of said overpayments from petitioner. (People v. Hanson, 330 Ill. 79 [ 161 N. E. 145 ]; 20 Cal. Jur. 972; 48 C. J. 738, sec. 286; 48 C.

Beckley v. Reclamation Board

205 Cal. App. 2d 734 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 1962

(Clement v. State Reclamation Board, 35 Cal.2d 628 [ 226 P.2d 897 ]; Archer v. City of Los Angeles, 19 Cal.2d 19 [ 119 P.2d 1 ]; O’Hara v. … (Archer v. City of Los Angeles, supra, p. 24; Clement v. State Reclamation Board, supra, p. 636.)

Hogan v. Retirement Board

13 Cal. App. 2d 676 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 1936

(Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal. App. 270 [ 279 Pac. 1080 ]; Sevina v. Hickock, 113 Cal. App. 301 [ 298 Pac. 116 ] ; Mc-Colgan v. Board of Police Commrs., 130 Cal. App. 66 [ 19 Pac. (2d) 815 ].) … It is the duty of the board to deny as well. The petition here pleads none of the essentials herein referred to, but merely seeks to substitute the court for the board as the fact-finding body.

Brown v. Continental Grain Co.

190 Cal. App. 2d 804 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 1961

Brown received the sum of $46,212.60 on account. … (Peebler v. Seawell, 122 Cal.App.2d 503 [ 265 P.2d 109 ].) In the absence of a showing of prejudice, failure to comply with the section will be disregarded on appeal. (Chamberlain v.

Khan v. Medical Board

12 Cal. App. 4th 1834 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1993

(James v. Board of Dental Examiners (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 1096, 1106 [ 218 Cal.Rptr. 710 ].) … To the extent that appellant relies on Barrett v. Board of Osteopathic Exmrs., supra, 4 Cal.App.2d 135, to support this contention, his reliance is misplaced.

Barber v. Retirement Board

18 Cal. App. 3d 273 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1971

Barber next contends that the finding of fact of the civil service commission with respect to his medical condition is res judicata and cannot be contradicted by the Board. He relies on French v. … Flaherty v. Board of Retirement, 198 Cal.App.2d 397, 402 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 256 ]).

Ware v. Retirement Board

65 Cal. App. 2d 781 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1944

(See, also, Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola, etc., 191 Cal. 187 [ 215 P. 673 , 27 A.L.R. 1508 ]; Brown v. Board of Police Commrs., 58 Cal.App.2d 473 [ 136 P.2d 617 ]; Dufton v. Daniels, 190 Cal. 577 [ 213 P. 949 ].) … State Board of Funeral Directors, 13 Cal.2d 75 [ 87 P.2d 848 ] (see, also, Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal. 2d 790 [ 136 P.2d 304 ]; Russell v.

Board of Library Trustees v. Board of Trustees

2 Cal. App. 760 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1906

It appears that the donation was to the city, not to the board of library trustees, to which it might have been legally made by the donor, as the act gives this board power to take property by gift. … It was said of the act of 1880, in People v. Howard, 94 Cal. 73 , [ 29 Pac. 485 ]: “The act of 1880 does not apply to all libraries, but only to such as may be established under its provisions.

Reclamation Board. v. Chambers

46 Cal. App. 476 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1920

As said by this court in Argyle Dredging Co. v. Chambers, 40 Cal. … a lien upon the lands so assessed ...” [5] In Argyle Dredging Co. v.

Kentfield v. Reclamation Board

137 Cal. App. 675 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1934

In Fawkes v. … (Citing Brooke v. Widdicombe, 39 Md. 386 ; 19 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 751, and other cases.) To the same effect is the case of Crow v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Stanislaus, 135 Cal.

Brown v. FSR Brokerage, Inc.

62 Cal. App. 4th 766 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1998

(See Baird v. Madsen (1943) 57 Cal.App.2d 465, 475 [ 134 P.2d 885 ]; Sierra Pacific Industries v. Carter (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 579, 582 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 764 ].) … Finally, respondents argue that appellant Brown has waived his claims because he did not seek to rescind the real estate transaction. They cite two cases. Neither supports them. The first, Vice v.

Dessert Seed Co. v. Brown

96 Cal. App. 3d 69 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 16, 1979

*71 Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. Dessert Seed Company, Inc. (Dessert) an agricultural employer subject to the Agricultural Labor Relations Act (ALRA), petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate (Code Civ. … A board order dismissing without a hearing objections to an election where no declarations were filed in support of the objection is nonreviewable (Radovich v.

Buhman v. Nickels & Brown Bros.

7 Cal. App. 592 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 21, 1908

(Hollen bach v. Schnabel, 101 Cal. 312 , [ 40 Am. St. Rep. 57 , 35 Pac. 872 ] ; Southern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Painter, 113 Cal. 247 , [ 45 Pac. 320 ].) … Soc. v. Harris, 111 Cal. 137 , [ 43 Pac. 526 ].) As we have seen, at the time the answer setting up the plea was filed the other suit was not pending but had been long since finally determined.

Brown v. Superior Court

8 Cal. App. 2d 420 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 1935

Brown, John Doe and John Doe Co., Defendants”. … In a somewhat similar situation in Comstock v.

Board of Osteopathic Examiners v. Board of Medical Examiners

53 Cal. App. 3d 78 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 18, 1975

On remand (D'Amico v. … (Robert v. Police Court, supra; Hale v. McGettigan, supra.)

Horstmyer v. Trial Board

21 Cal. App. 2d 533 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1937

(Donovan v. Board of Police Commrs., 32 Cal. App. 392, 403 [ 163 Pac. 69, 74 ].) … (Loche Paddon v. Superior Court, etc., 65 Cal. App. 34, 38 [ 223 Pac. 91 ]; Smith v. Superior Court, 89 Cal. App. 177 [ 264 Pac. 573 ]; Shepherd v. Board of Supervisors, etc., 137 Cal.