Case law

Constantine v. City of Sunnyvale

91 Cal. App. 2d 278 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1949

(Rose v. State of California, 19 Cal.2d 713, 730 [ 123 P.2d 505 ].) In Beals v. … (Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274 [ 57 P. 82 ]; Beals v. City of Los Angeles, supra; 4 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (2d ed. 1943) § 1527, p. 360-361.)

People v. Vela

11 Cal. App. 5th 68 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 2017

Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314 (Brown), for the proposition that the reasoning of Estrada, supra, 63 Cal.2d 740, cannot be extended to any situation other than the reduction of a defendant’s sentence for a particular offense … In Brown, the court held that a statutory change that temporarily increased conduct credits for prisoners did not apply retroactively. (Brown, supra, 54 Cal.4th at pp. 323-324.)

Garretson v. Post

68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 230 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 2007

Brown Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. … Guarantee Assn. (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 464, 468-469, 474 [ 39 Cal.Rptr.3d 43 ] [lien claims before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board]; Mann v.

Estate of Carson

234 Cal. App. 2d 516 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1965

Armstrong & Brown and Leon B. Brown for Objector and Respondent. FORD, J. … [fn. 5] The conclusion just stated finds support in the reasoning of the court in Calvert v. Fort Worth National Bank, 163 Tex. 405 [ 356 S.W.2d 918 ].

People v. Goulding

60 Cal. App. 542 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1923

(See State v. De Witt, 186 Mo. 61 [ 84 S. W. 956 ]; Lamb v. State, 69 Neb. 212 [ 95 N. W. 1050 ].) … , respectively, jumped on to the running-board of the automobile in which Mr.

Zisk v. City of Roseville

56 Cal. App. 3d 41 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1976

(Bastajian v. Brown, supra, 19 Cal.2d at p. 216 ; see also Martin v. Ray (1946) 74 Cal.App.2d 922, 928 [ 170 P.2d 75 ].) … (See Brown v. Western R. of Alabama (1949) 338 U.S. 294, 296 [ 94 L.Ed. 100, 102-103 , 70 S.Ct. 105 ]; but see King v. Schumacher (1939) 32 Cal.App.2d 172, 182-183 [ 89 P.2d 466 ].)

Falbo v. Board of Administration CA4/2

California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 2014

Filed 8/4/14 Falbo v. … On June 2, 2009, a clarification questionnaire sent by the Board to Bailey was completed and signed by Kathie Browne, an attorney representing Bailey.

Denton v. Vann

8 Cal. App. 677 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1908

This doctrine was affirmed in Davis v. Board of Supervisors of Merced Co., 7 Cal. App. 571 , [ 95 Pac. 170 ], In In re Kidd, 5 Cal. … The court in the case of Davis v. Board of Supervisors of Merced Co., 7 Cal.

Jackson v. Cal. State Personnel Board CA4/1

California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 2024

Filed 10/30/24 Jackson v. Cal. … (Fout v. State Personnel Bd. (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 817, 821.) On the other hand, we give no deference to the trial court’s determination of whether the Board abused its discretion. (Pollak v.

Yabsley v. Cingular Wireless, LLC

176 Cal. App. 4th 1156 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 2009

Brown, Jr., Attorney General, James Humes, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Frances T. … "The purpose of requiring a taxpayer to file a claim with the Board before commencing a tax refund lawsuit is to give the Board an opportunity to correct any mistakes." ( Loeffler v.

Divino Plastic Surgery v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · May 19, 2022

(Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners (1961) 57 Cal.2d 74, 81 (Magit); accord, PM & R Associates v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 357, 369.) … (a); see Brown v. Superior Court (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 989, 993 (Brown) [nine-month period is calculated from initial trial date, not from date of trial setting conference].)

Lipow v. Regents of the University of California

54 Cal. App. 3d 215 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 8, 1975

In Labor Board v. … (Labor Board v.

Claypool v. Wilson

4 Cal. App. 4th 646 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1992

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180-181 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ], original italics.) … {Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d atp. 180 .)

Cota v. County of Los Angeles

105 Cal. App. 3d 282 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1980

(Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind (1967) 67 Cal.2d 536, 542 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 21 , 432 P.2d 717 ]; County of Madera v. Glendron (1963) 59 Cal.2d 798, 804 [ 31 Cal. … (Ukhtomski v. Tioga Mutual Water Co., supra, 12 Cal.App.2d, p. 729; see Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. Hatton (1964) 61 Cal.2d 855, 859 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 848 , 395 P.2d 896 ]; Keith v.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY EMPLOYEES v. City of Stockton

161 Cal. App. 3d 813 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1984

to pay a $19 per employee premium increase and was justified in unilaterally deducting that amount from employee paychecks because in so doing it was merely maintaining the "status quo" as required by the Meyers-Milias-Brown … Section 3505 provides in pertinent part that "The governing body of a public agency, or such boards, commissions, administrative officers or other representatives as may be properly designated by law or by such governing

Anchor Pacifica Management Co. v. Green

205 Cal. App. 4th 232 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 2012

(Board of Regents v. … City of Los Angeles (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 155, 169 [ 125 Cal.Rptr.2d 474 ] {Brown), quoting Perry v. Sindermann (1972) 408 U.S. 593, 601 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 570 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 ].)

Alameda County Land Use Assn. v. City of Hayward

38 Cal. App. 4th 1716 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 12, 1995

Soc. (1944) 23 Cal.2d 719, 728, 737 [ 146 P.2d 673 , 151 A.L.R. 1062 ]; Browning v. Aymard (1964) 224 Cal.App.2d 277, 281 [ 36 Cal.Rptr. 604 ].) … We also appreciate, as Pleasanton’s counsel explained during oral argument, why respondents did not seek the formation of a regional planning board (Gov.

L.A. County Employees Retirement Assn. v. County of L.A.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 2024

(Verceles v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 776, 783; see Brown v. … (See Board of Retirement v.

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 2019

Cohen (3d Cir. 1984) 733 F.2d 1059, 1070; Matter of Continental Illinois Securities Litigation (7th Cir. 1984) 732 F.2d 1302, 1308; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C (6th Cir. 1983) 710 F.2d 1165; Newman v. … Meyers-Milias Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov.

Harvey v. City of Holtville

252 Cal. App. 2d 595 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1967

However, section 912 provided the petition to the superior court “shall be filed within 20 days after the application to the board [city council] is denied or deemed denied.” … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred.