Case law

People v. Ellis

207 Cal. App. 4th 1546 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 2012

(People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 318 [ 142 Cal.Rptr.3d 824 , 278 P.3d 1182 ] (Brown).) … Based on dicta in People v.

Rimokh v. California Franchise Tax Board CA2/4

California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 2024

v. 21STCV33765 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent. … (Miller v.

Michael Leslie Productions, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

207 Cal. App. 4th 1011 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 2012

(Brown v. City of Berkeley (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 231 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 1 ].) 3. … (Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 445 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 777 P.2d 610 ] (Common Cause).)

Continental Water Conditioning Co. of the Bay Area, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

207 Cal. App. 3d 783 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1989

(Continental), a California corporation, sought the refund of a sales tax which it paid under protest to respondent State Board of Equalization (Board). … Culligan Water Conditioning v. State Bd. of Equalization (1976) 17 Cal.3d 86 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 321 , 550 P.2d 593 ], supports the Board’s position.

Fernandez v. Cal. Victim Compensation Board CA6

California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 2021

No. 18CV03321) v. CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION BOARD, Defendant and Respondent. … Fernandez v. California Victim Compensation Board H048063

In Re Marriage of Nizenkoff

65 Cal. App. 3d 136 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1976

A pension right becomes a property interest when the employer cannot unilaterally repudiate the right (Brown, supra, p. 842 ). *139 In 1960, in Flemming v. … Social Security Board (3d Cir. 1946) 153 F.2d 704, 707 ).

City of Vallejo v. Burrill

64 Cal. App. 399 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1923

M., and there were present President O’Grady, Vice-President McCauley, Trustees McCudden, Fry, Browne, Deininger and Bergwall. Full Board present. … Ordinarily, as said by the supreme court of this state in the case of Board of Education v. Martin, 92 Cal. 209 [ 28 Pac. 799 ], “the public is not to lose its rights through the negligence of its agents.”

De La Questa v. Armstrong Holdings Co.

48 Cal. App. 487 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 12, 1920

(Brown v. Mason, 155 Cal. 155, 159 , [21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 328, 99 Pac. 867 ].) The purchaser was found, and negotiations were begun within the time limit. … (Ropes v.

Wilson v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank

14 Cal. App. 4th 1315 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1993

In Osborn v. … Brown v.

City of San Jose v. International Assn. of Firefighters, Local 230

178 Cal. App. 4th 408 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 14, 2009

(Ibid., discussing Governing Board v. Mann.) HI. … (Governing Board v. Mann, supra, 18 Cal.3d at p. 830 .) For these reasons, the amendment to section 3509 applies to the case before us. B.

Sandarg v. Dental Bd. of California

184 Cal. App. 4th 1434 · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 2010

[Citations.]” ’ ” (Green v. … (Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 135 Cal.App.3d 853, 856 [ 185 Cal.Rptr. 601 ].) The administrative law judge and the trial court applied that standard with respect to the board’s accusation.

Norlund v. Thorpe

34 Cal. App. 3d 672 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1973

(See Newsom v. Board of Supervisors, 205 Cal. 262, 271 [ 270 P. 676 ].) *676 Respondents argue that the annexation was complete when the Secretary of State filed a certified copy of Resolution 6076. … Brown (H. C.), J., concurred.

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. Superior Court

97 Cal. App. 3d 153 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1979

Mandate will not lie to control discretion lawfully entrusted to the board (State of California v. Superior Court (1974) 12 Cal.3d 237, 247 [ 115 Cal.Rptr. 497 , 524 P.2d 1281 ]; City & County of S. F. v. … In support of this argument, the Union cites Labor Board v. Katz (1962) 369 U.S. 736 [ 8 L.Ed.2d 230 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 ], but see Lipow v.

Haase v. San Diego Community College District

113 Cal. App. 3d 913 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1980

(Kamin v. Governing Board (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 1014, 1018 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 853 ]; see also American Federation of Teachers v. … Brown (Gerald), J., and Staniforth, J., concurred. 1 All statutory references are to the Education Code of 1959 as it read before its recodification effective April 30, 1977.

Harmer v. Superior Court

275 Cal. App. 2d 345 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1969

(See Thurmond v. Superior Court, 66 Cal.2d 836, 839-840 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 273 , 427 P.2d 985 ] ; Granai v. Witters, Longmoore, Akley & Brown (1963) 123 Vt, 468 [ 194 A.2d 391 ].) … (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 314-315 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].)

Dunlap v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

12 Cal. App. 2d 473 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1936

In the case of Mabray v. Union Pac. R. Co., 5 Fed. … Jur., p. 189, and Brown v. Southern Ry. Co. (Pennington v. Southern Ry. Co.), 61 Fed. (2d) 399.

Hooker v. East Riverside Irrigation District

38 Cal. App. 615 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1918

(Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U. S. 487, 503 , [ 27 L. Ed. 238 , 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 442]; Goldman v. Murray, 164 Cal. 419, 422, *622 [ 129 Pac. 462 ].) … (Griffith v. Grogan, 12 Cal. 317, 322 ; Crawford v. Roberts, 50 Cal. 235 ; Crary v. Bowers, 20 Cal. 85, 89 ; Gnarini v. Swiss-American Bank, 162 Cal. 181, 184 , [ 121 Pac. 726 ].)

People v. Keith Railway Equipment Co.

70 Cal. App. 2d 339 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1945

Bank v. Board of County Commrs., 264 U.S. 450 [ 44 S.Ct. 385 , 68 L.Ed. 784 ]; Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41 [ 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 ].) In Gorham Mfg. Co. v. State Tax Com. and in First Nat. … Bank v.

Beatie v. Davila

132 Cal. App. 3d 424 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1982

In Scott v. … Brown (G. A.), P.

Gisler v. County of Madera

38 Cal. App. 3d 303 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1974

OPINION BROWN (G.A.), P.J. … (See also Hill v. City of Manhattan Beach, supra, 6 Cal.3d 279, 285-286 ; Roney v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 138 Cal.