Case law

Buhman v. Nickels & Brown Bros.

1 Cal. App. 266 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 5, 1905

Proc., sec. 940; San Francisco Law and Collection Co. v. State, 141 Cal. 358 , [ 74 Pac. 1047 ]; Hoyt v. Stark, 134 Cal. 179 , [ 86 Am. St. Rep. 246 , 66 Pac. 223 ]; Robinson v. … Proc., sec. 1161; Harloe v. Lambie, 132 Cal. 135 , [ 64 Pac. 88 ]; Earl Fruit Co. v. Fava, 138 Cal. 76 , [ 70 Pac. 1073 ]; Kelly v. Teague, 63 Cal. 68 .)

Merchants Credit Ass'n v. Brown

83 Cal. App. 2d 296 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1948

Brown, Public Administrator, was appointed to administer the estate. Thereafter the public administrator corresponded with Attorney Leonard concerning ° the foreclosure actions handled by the latter for Mr. White. … It was the responsibility of Ben Brown (Public Administrator) to take care of the County’s business, to care of the George White.”

Thayer v. Kabateck Brown Kellner LLP

207 Cal. App. 4th 141 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2012

Defendants-appellants are Kabateck Brown Kellner LLP, a Los Angeles law firm, and Richard Kellner, a member of the firm (for convenience, usually referred to collectively as Kabateck). … Jespersen v.

Brown v. Nicholas

171 Cal. App. 3d 1064 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 1985

Eleanor Brown appeals from the judgment that admitted to probate the two documents we attach hereto as an appendix, thereby pre *1066 cluding her from inheriting her adoptive mother’s estate which consisted of only the family

Brown v. Friesleben Estate Co.

139 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 1956

In Pignaz v. … And in McClintock v. Powley, 210 Cal. 333 [ 291 P. 833 ], it was held that neither a trial court nor an appellate court could require additional security. Again in Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield etc.

Brown v. Department of Corrections

33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 754 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2005

In support of these arguments, Brown cites this court’s decision in Shoemaker v. Myers (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 1407 [ 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 203 ] (Shoemaker). … Hagberg noted with approval the conclusion in Braun v.

Brown v. Community Redevelopment Agency

168 Cal. App. 3d 1014 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1985

Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 245 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 239 , 583 P.2d 1281 ].) … This is elementary.’ ” (San Francisco v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1920) 183 Cal. 273, 279 [ 191 P. 26 ], quoted in Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. Saylor (1971) 5 Cal.3d 685, 692 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 488 P.2d 161 ].)

Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

168 Cal. App. 4th 938 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 2008

(Armendariz v. … (Richelle L. v.

Brooks v. Pension Board

30 Cal. App. 2d 118 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1938

(Klench v. Board of Pension Fund Commrs., 79 Cal. App. 171, 182 [ 249 Pac. 46 ].) … (Casserly v. Oakland, 6 Cal. (2d) 64 [ 56 Pac. (2d) 237 ].)” (See, also, Klench v. Board of Pension Fund Commrs., supra; Aitken v. Roche, 48 Cal. App. 753 [ 192 Pac. 464 ] ; Rumetsch v. Davie, 47 Cal.

People v. Superior Court (Brown)

111 Cal. App. 3d 948 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1980

(Murgia v. Municipal Court, at p. 298.) … (People v.

Pompilio v. Kosmo, Cho & Brown

39 Cal. App. 4th 1324 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1995

Rptr.2d 409 MICHAEL POMPILIO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. KOSMO, CHO & BROWN et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B091868. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. … Kosmo, Cho & Brown and Malcolm Tator for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION GILBERT, J. During arbitration proceedings, plaintiffs and defendants settle their lawsuit. Plaintiffs then renege.

Tropical Investment Co. v. Brown

45 Cal. App. 205 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1919

Brown and one Howard entered into an agreement, in writing, by which Howard purported to lease to the defendant Brown a certain hotel building to be erected on a lot described in the complaint, and situated in the city of … On October 27, 1915, Miss Brown, together with Howard and Paden, applied to the Fidelity Savings and Loan Association for a loan of $1,818, with which to pay a note secured by a chattel mortgage on Miss Brown’s furniture

Brown v. City of Oakland

51 Cal. App. 2d 150 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1942

(Goodman v. Board of Education, 48 Cal. … App. (2d) 731 [ 120 P. (2d) 665 ]), and school boards are liable as such in the name of the district for judgments against the district based upon injury to persons or property (School Code, sec. 2.801; Goodman v.

Board of Education v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

160 Cal. App. 3d 674 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1984

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) … Board of Education (1941) 17 Cal.2d 753 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 229 ]; Kacsur v. Board of Trustees (1941) 18 Cal.2d 586 [ 116 P.2d 593 ]; and Aebli v. Board of Education (1944) 62 Cal.App.2d 706 [ 145 P.2d 601 ].

Douglas v. Pension Board

75 Cal. App. 335 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1925

Section 167 of said charter creates a Pension Board, consisting of the city manager and the members of the civil service board of said city. … (Whitehead v. Davie, 189 Cal. 715, 717 [ 209 Pac. 1008 ]; Hammitt v. Gaynor, 144 N. Y. Supp. 123 ; People v. Abbott, 274 Ill. 380 [Ann. Cas. 1918D, 450, 113 N. E. 606 ]; State v. Lave, 89 Neb. 149 [Ann.

Brown v. USA Taekwondo

California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 2019

USAT’s board of directors approved the temporary suspension of Gitelman pending the hearing. … But USAT board president Devin Johnson allegedly refused to present the ethics committee finding to the full board of directors.

Brown v. USA Taekwondo

California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 2019

USAT’s board of directors approved the temporary suspension of Gitelman pending the hearing. … But USAT board president Devin Johnson allegedly refused to present the ethics committee finding to the full board of directors.

Brown v. USA Taekwondo

California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 2019

USAT’s board of directors approved the temporary suspension of Gitelman pending the hearing. … But USAT board president Devin Johnson allegedly refused to present the ethics committee finding to the full board of directors.

Brown v. USA Taekwondo

California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 2019

USAT’s board of directors approved the temporary suspension of Gitelman pending the hearing. … But USAT board president Devin Johnson allegedly refused to present the ethics committee finding to the full board of directors.

Governing Board v. Metcalf

36 Cal. App. 3d 546 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1974

(See Board of Education v. Swan, 41 Cal.2d 546, 552 [ 261 P.2d 261 ], overruled on a different point in Bekiaris v. Board of Education, 6 Cal.3d 575, 588 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 16 , 493 P.2d 480 ]; Pettit v. … (See Pettit v. State Board of Education, supra, 10 Cal.3d 29, 35-36 .)