Case law

Brown v. Pacific Coast Agency

53 Cal. App. 788 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 1921

(Rowley v. Stoddard, 7 Johns. (N. Y.) 206; Bank of Catskill v. Messenger, 9 Cow. (N. Y.) 37; Irvine v. Millbank, 56 N. Y. 635 ; Murray v. Fox, 104 N. Y. 382, 390 , [ 10 N. E. 864 ]; Hood v. Hayward, 124 N. … Co. v.

California Medical Ass'n v. Brown

193 Cal. App. 4th 1449 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2011

(People v. Benson (1998) 18 Cal.4th 24, 30 [ 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 294 , 954 P.2d 557 ] [no need to construe unambiguous statutory language]; Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. … (La Fe, Inc. v.

Brown v. Travelers Insurance Co.

31 Cal. App. 2d 122 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1939

(Hudak v. Union Indemnity Co., 108 Conn. 598 [ 143 Atl. 885 ]; Witzko v. Koenig, 224 Wis. 674 [ 272 N. W. 864, 866 ]; Morrison v. Royal Indemnity Co., 180 App. Div. 709 [167 N. V. Supp. 732, 733].) … For a case holding to the contrary see Bitzer v. Southern Surety Co., 245 Ill. App. 295 .

City Lumber Co. v. Brown

46 Cal. App. 603 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1920

In support of their view they cite MacLeod v. … In Koch v. Briggs, 14 Cal. 257 , [ 73 Am.

People v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 2017

SF128800A) v. CHESTER LLEWELL BROWN, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, Richard Mallet, Judge. Affirmed. … (See People v.

People v. Superior Court (Brown)

49 Cal. App. 3d 160 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1975

About 45 minutes thereafter Officer Wheeler then observed Gaiy Thomas Thompson and David Michael Brown together in the brown jeep. “(d) That William Wheeler is a reliable informant. … (United States v.

Brown v. Southern Pacific Co.

92 Cal. App. 2d 639 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1949

Brown had testified to her marriage to decedent, as to his age, and other matters unrelated to the physical facts. … (Snowball v. Snowball, 164 Cal. 476, 480 [ 129 P. 784 ] ; County of Sonoma v. Hall, 129 Cal. 659, 662 [ 62 P. 213 ]; Marshall v. Hancock, 80 Cal. 82, 83 [ 22 P. 61 ].)

Ennis-Brown Co. v. Long

7 Cal. App. 313 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1908

(Cook v. Pendergast, 61 Cal. 72, 77 .) In Grant v. … It appears from Brown’s affidavit that Coggshall resides at Grand Island, Sacramento county.

DISTRICT v. Board

89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 215 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1999

Dist. v. … Counties—which have an interest in preserving their property tax bases—can sue assessment appeals boards to ensure those boards have followed the law in determining assessed valuations. (See County of San Diego v.

Brown v. Douglas Aircraft Co.

166 Cal. App. 2d 232 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1958

In Judson v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Birchfield Boiler, Inc.

226 Cal. App. 2d 487 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1964

Fisher Governor Co. v. … State of Washington, supra, and Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co., supra. Other eases to the same effect are: West Publishing Co. v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.2d 720 [ 128 P.2d 777 ]; Boote’s Hatcheries etc. Co. v.

Brown v. American Bicycle Group, LLC

224 Cal. App. 4th 665 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 11, 2014

Haas v. … (People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 547.) In People v.

People v. Brown

25 Cal. App. 2d 360 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1938

25 Cal.App.2d 360 (1938) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. SHELDON W. BROWN, Appellant. Crim. No. 360. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Appellate District. March 15, 1938. Charles M. Astle for Appellant. U.S.

Brown v. De Waard & Sons

99 Cal. App. 222 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1929

(Patterson v. Keeney, 165 Cal. 465 [Ann. Cas. 1914D, 232, 132 Pac. 1043 ].) We find nothing in the decisions cited by appellants which is in conflict with this well-recognized principle. … The only ease in which the language employed might seem at all inharmonious with the general rule that the decision of the trial court on disputed matters of fact is conclusive, is Savings Bank of Santa Rosa v.

Palmer v. Brown

127 Cal. App. 2d 44 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 4, 1954

127 Cal.App.2d 44 (1954) DAN SAXON PALMER et al., Respondents, v. MAX BROWN, Appellant. Civ. No. 20263. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two. Aug. 4, 1954. Adelman, Schwartz & Ferguson and Isaac E. … [fn. 4] In Joseph v.

Brown Co. v. Appellate Department

148 Cal. App. 3d 891 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1983

Brown Company, doing business as Livingston-Graham (Livingston), sued in the municipal court to enforce a mechanic’s lien. … Bryan v. Abbott, supra, 131 Cal. 222, 224 ; Corbett v. Chambers, supra, 109 Cal. 178 , 184-185; Frank Pisano & Associates v. Taggart, supra, 29 Cal.App.3d 1, 19 ; Ingersoll v.

Brown v. Waldo

12 Cal. App. 2d 185 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1936

BROWN, Appellant, v. ROLLIN F. WALDO, Respondent. Civ. No. 9783. California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division One. February 28, 1936. … In the case of Brown v. Ferdon, 5 Cal.2d 226 [54 PaCal.2d 712], it was held that the code section mentioned cannot apply retroactively to instruments executed before its effective date.

Brown v. Chowchilla Land Co.

59 Cal. App. 164 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1922

In Stevinson v. … However, it is the claim of respondent that if notice was required, it was furnished by the service of the so-called notice of cancellation, and Pearson v. Brown, 27 Cal.

Brown v. Mayor of Redlands

174 Cal. App. 2d 763 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1959

(Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 149 Cal.App.2d 296 [ 308 P.2d 405 ]; Madsen *764 v. Turlock Irr. Dist., 56 Cal.App.2d 742 [ 133 P.2d 416 ]; Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 [ 252 P.2d 1 ].) Appeal dismissed.

Edward Brown & Sons v. McColgan

53 Cal. App. 2d 504 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1942

It follows that unless the fran- " chise tax on Edward Brown & Sons is a direct tax on the insurance companies it represents, appellant must pay the franchise tax. … It is apparent that any effect that the payment of a fran *508 chise tax by Edward Brown & Sons may have on the insurance companies it represents is at most indirect.