Case law

Brown v. De Carlo

97 Cal. App. 426 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1929

Brown v. Superior Court

180 Cal. App. 3d 701 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1986

(Deyo v. Kilbourne, supra, 84 Cal.App.3d at p. 785 ; Coy v. Superior Court (1962) 58 Cal.2d 210, 216-217 [ 23 Cal.Rptr. 393 , 373 P.2d 457 ]; Leach v. … Stevens v.

Brown v. City of Fremont

75 Cal. App. 3d 141 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1977

Brown, in his complaint and declaration, has made conflicting statements of a material fact. As stated in Manti v. … Brown has admitted in his complaint a valuable economic use of the property and cannot by his own declaration deny it. The court in Joslin v. Marin Mun.

Eternity Investments, Inc. v. Brown

60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 134 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 2007

(d) [when issue of licensure is controverted, contractor has burden of producing verified certificate of licensure from Contractors’ State License Board].) … . *747 The Browns’ reliance on National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Stites Prof. Law Corp., supra, 235 Cal.App.3d 1718 , is misplaced.

County of Riverside v. Brown

30 Cal. App. 2d 747 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1939

(Freese v. Pennie, 110 Cal. 467 [ 42 Pac. 978 ] ; People v. Thompson, 5 Cal. App. (2d) 668 [ 43 Pac. (2d) 606 ]; City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co., 134 Cal. App. 268 [ 25 Pac. (2d) 224 ].) … When the court is informed of the extent and nature of such services, its own experience furnishes it with every element necessary to fix their value. ’ ’ (See, also, People v. Thompson, supra; Los Angeles v.

Brown v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 2013

Plaintiffs urge us to adopt the position taken by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in D.R. … Plaintiffs urge us to follow Brown v.

Monroe-Irwin v. Brown

46 Cal. App. 2d 67 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1941

Brown; that the realty company thereupon took immediate possession of the property and wrongfully ousted the tenants, terminating all income therefrom, and proceeded to so extravagantly and negligently expend or appropriate … Brown, subject to the first trust deed, he being the only bidder therefor. This suit was then filed on June 30, 1938. The findings and judgment are adequately supported by the evidence.

Brown v. Smith

California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 2018

(See McAllister v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (1968) 69 Cal.2d 408, 414 [“Matters of scientific certainty are subject to judicial notice.”]; Gould v. … (Workman v. Mingo County Board of Education (4th Cir. 2011) 419 Fed.Appx. 348, 353 [West Virginia’s mandatory immunization program withstands strict scrutiny].)

Farmers Ins. Exch. v. Brown

252 Cal. App. 2d 120 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1967

Brown was injured while riding in an automobile owned by her and her husband, Ernest C. Brown, and driven by him. The injury caused her death. … Brown (H. C.), J., concurred.

Eng v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 2018

Fish, adopted bylaws, elected corporate officers and a board of directors (all positions being filled by Brown and Levy), and approved the issuance of 100 shares of stock. The directors approved a proposal for B.L.E. … (People v.

People v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · May 23, 2018

Brown contends the trial court erred in denying the defense motions. We review the trial court’s rulings de novo. (See Aryeh v. … A144372, People v. Brown 16

High v. Brown University

250 Cal. App. 2d 561 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1967

(See Loock v. Pioneer Title Ins. etc. Co., 4 Cal.App.2d 245, 249 [ 40 *568 P.2d 526 ] ; Code Civ. Proc., §§ 372, 373; see Mabry v. … (See Loock v. Pioneer Title Ins. etc. Co., supra.)

Sierra National Bank v. Brown

18 Cal. App. 3d 98 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 1971

After this meeting, Pearson submitted a report on the matter to Luehring and the bank’s board of directors. Mrs. Brown next met with Luehring. … Shuler Corp. v.

Stirling v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 2018

Brown, Jr. (the Governor) to act on Stirling’s whistleblower allegation in accordance with Section 56, subdivisions (d) and (f)(1). … (d)), we cannot take judicial notice of the matters asserted in it or accept them as true (Board of Pilot Commissioners v. Superior Court (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 577, 597).

McMillan Process Co. v. Brown

33 Cal. App. 2d 279 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 8, 1939

(Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co., 129 Cal. 367, at p. 375 [ 62 Pac. 39, 41 ]; Rose v. Foord, 96 Cal. 152 [ 30 Pac. 1114 ]; Taback v. Greenberg, 108 Cal. App. 759, 760 [ 292 Pac. 279 ].) … (Wood v. McDonald, 66 Cal. 456 [ 6 Pac. 452 ] ; San Diego Const. Co. v. Mannix, 175 Cal. 548, 558 [ 166 Pac. 325 ].)

Brown v. City of Berkeley

57 Cal. App. 3d 223 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 1976

(Ex parte Roach, 104 Cal. 272 [ 37 Pac. 1044 ]; Weisman v. Board of Building & Safety Commrs., 85 Cal.App. 493 [ 259 Pac. 768 ].) To be valid, an ordinance must harmonize with the charter. (South Pasadena v. … Employees Assn. v.

Brown v. Garcia

California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 2017

This action is between two groups of the Elem Indian Colony Pomo Tribe (the Tribe), the “Brown faction” (plaintiffs) and the “Garcia Council” (defendants). … (See Dill v. Berquist Construction Co. (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 1426; R.E. Sanders & Co. v. Lincoln-Richardson Enterprises, Inc. (1980) 108 Cal.App.3d 71; Borsuk v.

Brown v. West Covina Toyota

26 Cal. App. 4th 555 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 1994

Co. v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Superior Court

24 Cal. App. 2d 479 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1938

Davis “Herbert Cutler Brown “Attorneys for Defendant and Appellant “Ingle Carpenter & Harold A. Fendler “By Harold A. … Fendler ‘1 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Respondent. ’ ’ The plaintiff was one Zoe Lowe Brown and the only defendant, Herbert Cutler Brown, was also the only appellant in the proceeding in which the “transcript” was prepared

Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank

204 Cal. App. 4th 1353 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 2012

Jane Brown was/is in default on a home mortgage. Foreclosure proceedings were commenced and she filed suit to prevent the sale of her home. … (Critzer v. Enos (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 1242, 1250 [ 115 Cal.Rptr.3d 203 ]; Viejo Bancorp, Inc. v. Wood (1989) 217 Cal.App.3d 200, 205 [ 265 Cal.Rptr. 620 ].)