Case law

Jackson v. Brown

34 Cal. App. 65 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1917

Early in January, 1916, the plaintiff wrote to the defendant a letter *66 claiming that there was a certain balance due him on account of his fee in a suit conducted by him for the defendant, entitled Brown v. Lee.

Pflug v. Brown

57 Cal. App. 312 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1922

Pauline Pflug v. Julius B. Brown.

Brown v. Jerome

146 Cal. App. 2d 698 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 1956

I want to see you get that building up,” and “Jack, (Brown) don’t worry about the time if it takes you a little longer, I know that you will be happy with your building and so will I.” … Brown or Mr. Brownstein that if they didn’t get their work done on time, that you would declare the agreement at an end,” and that “if they didn’t complete on that date that they would forfeit their $10,000.”

Bastajian v. Brown

44 Cal. App. 2d 278 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 1941

Brown v. MacDougall

44 Cal. App. 2d 491 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1941

Brown v. Peetz

132 Cal. App. 2d 753 · California Court of Appeal · May 5, 1955

and Peetz and at another time found it was entered into between Brown and the defendants. … entered into an agreement on December 9,1950, whereby Brown agreed to do this work for $4,350; that by reason of this contract Peetz was not obligated to pay Brown until after the intercommunication system had been completely

Whitted v. Brown

48 Cal. App. 2d 856 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1941

Rankin v. Brown

131 Cal. App. 137 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 8, 1933

Brown is ready for it and then we will pay the interest on it until then and he will pay it from then on”. … Brown, while you intended that note and mortgage to go to the bank, yet you delivered them to Fitzgerald as a representative of the bank—that was your understanding and your purpose? A.

Brown v. Superior Court

9 Cal. Rptr. 3d 912 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 2004

All four of the other cases on which Brown relies—Nicoletti v. Lizzoli (1981) 124 Cal.App.3d 361 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 685 ], Cappa v. … Bell v. Shine, Browne & Diamond (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1011, 1022 [ 43 Cal.Rptr.2d 717 ].)

People v. Brown

164 Cal. App. 2d 790 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1958

Moody Lorenzo Brown was indicted for and in a court trial convicted of an offense of selling heroin and was sentenced to state prison. Brown appeals from the judgment and the denial of his motion for new trial. … (People v. Sutton, 73 Cal. 243 [ 15 P. 86 ]; People v. McGarry, 42 Cal.2d 429, 433 [ 267 P.2d 254 ].) The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial.

Brown v. Lelande

20 Cal. App. 71 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1912

Brown v. Lee

38 Cal. App. 242 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1918

Coverrubias v. Brown

2 Cal. App. 2d 658 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 1934

A Chevrolet automobile owned by 'Juan Gonzales and driven by his brother Basilio Gonzales *659 collided with an Oldsmobile automobile driven by the appellant Brown on April 23', 1932, at the intersection of Placentia, Avenue

Brown v. Superior Court

10 Cal. App. 2d 365 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1935

Petitioners herein seek by mandate to compel respondent to enter judgment in an action pending in the Superior Court of Sierra County, entitled Brown et al. v. … A. 715].) ” In Pacific Paving Co. v. Vizelich, 2 Cal.

Brown v. Superior Court

218 Cal. App. 2d 430 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1963

Justice Peters, referring to City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court, supra, in Suezaki v. … Dept. of Public Works v. Donovan, supra; Oceanside, supra; Mowry v.

Menge v. Brown

173 Cal. App. 2d 6 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 12, 1959

Brown is to have the right to remove the main house located upon said real property and to retain title to said house as her separate property. ’ ’ (Emphasis added.) (Brown v. … Brown v. Louis A.

Brown v. Voight

112 Cal. App. 2d 569 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1952

He installed three concrete pillars marking a fan-shaped entrance from Highway 395 to the motel road, and installed a large sign on Brown’s land at the south side of this entrance, and another sign on Lacey’s land some half … license being expressly made revocable at the will of the licensor; that Saner erected the three pillars on Lacey’s property under an assumed and implied license from Lacey; that Saner erected a line of poles, two being on Brown

Bittick v. Brown

130 Cal. App. 2d 47 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1954

People v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 2024

(See People v. Pacheco (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 207, 214 [facts surrounding conviction for arson raised inference of risk that defendant could commit murder by arson in the future].) Brown relies on People v. … In response, Brown asserts that any such request would have been untimely under People v.

Brown v. Jackson

89 Cal. App. 2d 664 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 1949

Subsequently, Isabelle McKenzie died, and Otie Brown was duly appointed administratrix of her estate. … Keely v. Moore, 196 U.S. 38 , 49 L.Ed. 376 , 25 S.Ct. 169 ; Adams v. Norris, 23 How. 353 , 16 L.Ed. 539 ; Murray v. Murphy, 39 Miss. 214 ; Re Hull, 117 Iowa 738 , 89 N.W. 979 ; Bolton v.