Case law

Harper v. Ultimo

7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 418 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 2003

(See Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 114 [ 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 745 , 6 P.3d 669 ] [quoting Stirlen v. … (See McManus v.

Brown v. Watt

256 Cal. App. 2d 44 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 1967

(Cannon v. Selmser, 85 Cal.App. 783 [ 260 P. 332 ].) … (Bewick v. Mecham, 26 Cal.2d 92, 99 [ 156 P.2d 757 , 157 A.L.R. 1277 ] ; Lynch v. Keystone Consol. Min. Co., 163 Cal. 690, 700 [ 126 P. 968 ].)

Brown v. Francisco

123 Cal. App. 2d 413 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1954

Co. v. McColgan, 68 Cal.App.2d 48, 54 [ 156 P.2d 81 ]; McCarthy v. … In Gibson v.

People v. Brown

109 Cal. App. 99 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1930

Brown v. Guarantee Insurance

155 Cal. App. 2d 679 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1957

Co. v. … Co. v. Menin, 115 F.2d 975, 977 ; In re Mittlemann, 43 F.Supp. 146, 148 , aff’d, 123 F.2d 703 ; Cobleigh v. State Land Office Board, 305 Mich. 434 [ 9 N.W.2d 665, 666 ].)

People v. Brown

52 Cal. App. 2d 428 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1942

Another inspector testified that at the time of his arrest “Brown said ‘Don’t bring in any more of those fellows. I clipped them all. ’ I said ‘Brown, this is serious. … (People v. Carter, 131 Cal. App. 177 [ 21 P. (2d) 129 ] ; People v. Plum, 88 Cal. App. 575 [ 263 Pac. 862, 265 , Pac. 322] ; People v. Myers, supra; People v. Breyer, 139 Cal. App. 547 [ 34 P. (2d) 1065, 1067 ].)

Brown v. Patella

24 Cal. App. 2d 362 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 1938

(Dyer v. Sebrell, 135 Cal. 597 [ 67 Pac. 1036 ].) Nor was it necessary to its legality that its execution should have been authorized by resolution of the board of directors previously adopted. (Leitch v. Marx, 21 Cal. … In Smith v.

Brown v. Martin

23 Cal. App. 736 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1914

(Williamson v. Cummings, 95 Cal. 652 , [ 30 Pac. 762 ]; Harbaugh v. Honey Lake etc. Co., 109 Cal. 70 , [ 41 Pac. 792 ]; Ingrim v. Epperson, 137 Cal. 370 , [ 70 Pac. 165 ]; Staley v. O’Day, 22 Cal. … (Mitchell v. California etc. S. S. Co., 156 Cal. 576 , [ 105 Pac. 590 ]; Jergins v. Schenck, 162 Cal. 747 , [ 124 Pac. 426 ]; Broderick v. Cochran, 18 Cal. App. 202 , [ 122 Pac. 972 ]; Davidson v. All Persons, 18 Cal.

Riley v. Brown

72 Cal. App. 468 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1925

(Wheatley v. Wheeler, 34 Md. 62 ; Adams v. Funk, 53 Ill. 219 .) … A., p. 846, note to Chick v. Robinson.)

People v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 2021

(People v. Brown (Super. Ct. Santa Clara County, 2020, No. 17AP002184) at p. 2 5 (Brown).) … H048462 People v. Brown

Brown v. Harper

116 Cal. App. 2d 48 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1953

As was said in Witaschek v. … As was said in Cox v.

Timm v. Brown

78 Cal. App. 2d 609 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1947

(Kreling v. Kreling, 118 Cal. 413, 420 [ 50 P. 546 ]; 21 Cal.Jur. 277, § 194.) … (Samuels v. Ottinger, 169 Cal. 209 [ 146 P. 638 , Ann.Cas. 1916E 830]; Treff v. Gulko, 214 Cal. 591, 599 [ 7 P.2d 697 ]; Ellingson v.

Brown v. Superior Court

101 Cal. App. 4th 313 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 2002

Thus, the imposition of periodic polygraph examinations in connection with Brown’s stalking therapy program is reasonably related to the crime of which Brown was convicted and to possible future criminality. (People v. … Brown has misconstrued the nature of the privilege against self-incrimination; it is not self-executing; rather, it must be claimed. (Minnesota v.

People v. Brown

98 Cal. Rptr. 2d 519 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 2000

In People v. … In People v.

Amjadi v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2021

No. 30-2018-00976542) JERROD WEST BROWN, OPINION Defendant and Respondent. … (Eddy v. Temkin (1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 1115, 1120.)

Phillips v. Brown

199 Cal. App. 2d 262 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1962

Brown and Amy L. … (Guardianship of Walsh, 100 Cal.App.2d 194, 196 [ 223 P.2d 322 , 22 A.L.R.2d 689 ]; Darwin v. Ganger, 174 Cal.App.2d 63, 74 [ 344 P.2d 353 ].)

Brown v. Holzwasser, Inc.

108 Cal. App. 483 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 24, 1930

In Williamson v. Hardy, 47 Cal. … In the case of Sharpless v.

Brown v. Hatch

156 Cal. App. 2d 684 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1958

(Estate of Hinckley, 58 Cal. 457, 513 ; Collier v. Lindley, 203 Cal. 641, 654 [ 266 P. 526 ]; Estate of Bunn, 33 Cal.2d 897 , 903 [ 206 P.2d 635 ]; see 14 C.J.S. § 6a, p. 427.)” … Justice Holmes disposed of that problem cogently and convincingly in Minot v. Baker (1888), 147 Mass. 348 [ 17 N.E. 839 at 846 and 847, 9 Am.St.Rep. 713 ].

Cochran v. Brown

84 Cal. App. 743 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1927

Brown, and in which the plaintiff was riding as Brown’s guest at the time of the collision. … Finkle v. Tait, 55 Cal.

Pflug v. Brown

57 Cal. App. 312 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 11, 1922

Pauline Pflug v. Julius B. Brown.